Some customers who purchased the product reckoned that it was good value for money. Expert website Whatdigitalcamera.com mentioned five years ago “Where once you'd struggle to purchase anything respectable around that price, there are now a host of models vying for pole position” in their review of the Nikon Coolpix S2500. Expert website Ephotozine.com wrote in their review “The Coolpix S2500 represents good value for money although for just £111 you can get the Coolpix S3100 which has more megapixels, longer optical zoom”. Five years ago Digicambuyer.co.uk scored the product 4 stars and wrote in their review “A good-looking camera that’s refreshingly slim, light and good value for money”.
A number of Nikon Coolpix S2500 reviewers who reviewed the product concluded that it was cheap. Photographyblog.com said on expert review site PhotographyBlog.com “The Nikon Coolpix S2500 is a budget digicam with a sense of style thanks to its all-metal body”. Cnet.co.uk said five years ago “Nowadays, many big-name manufacturers are coming up with low-cost cameras that don't skimp on performance or features” in their review. Expert review site Pocket-Lint.com wrote “The Nikon Coolpix S2500 is a 12.1-megapixel budget compact with a slender 20mm body” in their review of the Nikon Coolpix S2500.
A number of Nikon Coolpix S2500 owners said in their reviews that it was a bargain for the price. Ephotozine said “Cheap, in-camera Colour Options” in their Nikon Coolpix S2500 review and gave the product a rating of 4 stars. Cnet.com.au mentioned in their review of this digital camera on expert review site CNET.com.au “Amidst the influx of cheap compact cameras here at CNET of late - see the”. Cnet.com.au also wrote “The S2500 is a respectable cheap compact that loses marks for its basic feature set”.