A few customers who reviewed the product thought it was able to produce good images. Photographyblog.com said on PhotographyBlog.com “A 21x optical zoom with a focal range equivalent to 23-483mm, built-in optical image stabilisation” and rated the product 4 stars. Expert website Laptopmag.com wrote “This Android-powered camera takes great pictures and lets you share them wirelessly.” yet only rated it 3 stars. Cnet.co.uk mentioned on expert website CNET.co.uk “Spot-on for anyone who wants an easy way to share their pictures without being restricted to smart phone resolutions” in their review of the Samsung GC100 and scored the product 80 out of 100.
Two Samsung GC100 owners wrote in their reviews that this digital cameras had a good image sensor. Four years ago expert review site Digitaltrends.com wrote “This isn't a perfect camera; it could have a bigger sensor and a better lens” and rated it 70 out of 100. Gadgetshow.channel5.com mentioned in their Samsung GC100 review three years ago “With a 16 megapixel sensor and a huge 21x optical zoom, this snapper would be impressive on paper even without its ace in the hold”.
One person concluded that this digital cameras was good in low light. expert review site Chip.com.my wrote “Low light performance could be better, though.(previously publishe”. One customer said that the Samsung GC100 had a good picture resolution. Photoanswers.co.uk wrote “£399 Effective resolution” in their review.
One Samsung GC100 reviewer wrote in their reviews that this digital cameras had a good ISO range. Theverge.com wrote “Good high ISO performance”.