Beko CFD 6914 AP vs Samsung RB29FWRND vs Siemens KG39NAI32

(9)
(20)
Beko CFD 6914 AP
Samsung RB29FWRND
Siemens KG39NAI32

Top Prices

Electrical Discount
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
CS Suppliers
Delivery unknown
In stock
Very
Out of stock
Currys
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (10 available)
Appliances Direct
Standard delivery: £4.95
In stock
Electrical Discount
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
One more fridge shelve basket Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP has four fridge shelves baskets (as does the Samsung RB29FWRND), however the Siemens KG39NAI32 only has three fridge shelves baskets.
One more freezer shelve/basket Edit
The number of freezer shelves/baskets on the Beko CFD 6914 AP is four, but the Siemens KG39NAI32 only has three freezer shelves/baskets.
9% bigger gross freezer capacity Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 129L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer. That's 11L bigger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (128L) and 1L bigger than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (128L).
Cheaper by £69
The Beko CFD 6914 AP costs £309.99, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND is £379.00.
9 Reasons For
Built-in display Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a built-in display (as does the Siemens KG39NAI32), whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP does not have a built-in display.
Quieter noise level Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 39dB noise level fridge freezer. That's 3dB quieter than the Beko CFD 6914 AP (43dB) and 4dB quieter than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (43dB).
Four fridge shelves baskets Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a four fridge shelve basket fridge freezer, and so does the Beko CFD 6914 AP, whereas the Siemens KG39NAI32 only has three fridge shelves baskets.
A bit larger net freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a net freezer capacity of 98L, however the Beko CFD 6914 AP and the Siemens KG39NAI32 are both only 94L net freezer capacity fridge freezers (4L smaller).
10% longer storage time during power failure Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 20h storage time during power failure fridge freezer. That's 2h longer than the Beko CFD 6914 AP and the Siemens KG39NAI32 (18h).
4% lighter Edit
Samsung RB29FWRND is 63kg heavy. That's 2kg lighter than the Beko CFD 6914 AP ().
Available from 19 shops
A greater number of stores increases the chances of this fridge freezer remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
More popular
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 1169 by sales volume in our fridge freezers, however the Beko CFD 6914 AP ranks No. 3645.
User reviews are vastly better
The Samsung RB29FWRND has an average user review score of 92% based on 20 reviews, however the Beko CFD 6914 AP has an average rating of 64% (based on 9 reviews).
8 Reasons For
Built-in display Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a built-in display (as does the Samsung RB29FWRND), whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP does not have a built-in display.
53L larger total net capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a total net capacity of 313L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is only a 260L total net capacity fridge freezer (53L smaller) and the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 288L total net capacity fridge freezer (25L smaller).
49L larger total gross capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a total gross capacity of 358L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is only a 310L total gross capacity fridge freezer (48L smaller) and the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 309L total gross capacity fridge freezer (49L smaller).
Larger net fridge capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a net fridge capacity of 219L, but the Beko CFD 6914 AP is only a 166L net fridge capacity fridge freezer (53L smaller) and the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 190L net fridge capacity fridge freezer (29L smaller).
49L larger fridge gross capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a fridge gross capacity of 230L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is only a 181L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer (49L smaller) and the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 191L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer (39L smaller).
58% bigger freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 14kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer. That's 8kg/24h bigger than the Beko CFD 6914 AP (14kg/24h) and 2kg/24h bigger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (14kg/24h).
12% cheaper to run
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is £82.25 cheaper to run than the Beko CFD 6914 AP and £70.50 cheaper to run than the Samsung RB29FWRND over five years. Read more
Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Siemens KG39NAI32 is "A++", however the rating of the Beko CFD 6914 AP is "A+" and the rating of the Samsung RB29FWRND is "A+".

Reasons Against

16 Reasons Against
Does not have a built-in display Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP does not have a built-in display, but the Samsung RB29FWRND and the Siemens KG39NAI32 have a built-in display.
21% smaller total net capacity Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 260L total net capacity fridge freezer. That's 28L smaller than the Samsung RB29FWRND (313L) and 53L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (313L).
3dB louder noise level Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP has a noise level of 42dB, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 39dB noise level fridge freezer (3dB quieter) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 43dB noise level fridge freezer (1dB louder).
16% smaller total gross capacity Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 310L total gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 1L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (358L) and 48L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (358L).
Smaller net fridge capacity Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 166L net fridge capacity fridge freezer. That's 24L smaller than the Samsung RB29FWRND (219L) and 53L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (219L).
Smaller fridge gross capacity Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 181L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 10L smaller than the Samsung RB29FWRND (230L) and 49L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (230L).
5% smaller net freezer capacity Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 94L net freezer capacity fridge freezer, and so does the Siemens KG39NAI32. That's 4L smaller than the Samsung RB29FWRND (94L).
Shorter storage time during power failure Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP has a storage time during power failure of 18h (as does the Siemens KG39NAI32), but the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 20h storage time during power failure fridge freezer (2h longer).
Smaller freezer capacity Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP has a freezer capacity of 6kg/24h, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 12kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (6kg/24h bigger) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 14kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (8kg/24h bigger).
2kg heavier Edit
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 65kg heavy fridge freezer, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 63kg heavy fridge freezer (2kg lighter).
Not as many stockists
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is only stocked by 5 shops, however the Samsung RB29FWRND is stocked by 24 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this fridge freezer.
Older by five months
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is five months older than the Samsung RB29FWRND.
£82.25 more expensive to run over five years
The Beko CFD 6914 AP costs £693.25 to run which is £11.75 more to run than the Samsung RB29FWRND and £82.25 more to run than the Siemens KG39NAI32 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Beko CFD 6914 AP is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 3645 by number of sales in our fridge freezers, but the Samsung RB29FWRND ranks No. 1169.
Inferior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Beko CFD 6914 AP is "A+", but the rating of the Samsung RB29FWRND is "A+" and the rating of the Siemens KG39NAI32 is "A++".
User review Rating is hugely Worse
The Beko CFD 6914 AP only has an average user score of 64%, but the Samsung RB29FWRND has an average user rating of 92% (based on 20 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
25L smaller total net capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a total net capacity of 288L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 260L total net capacity fridge freezer (28L smaller) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 313L total net capacity fridge freezer (25L larger).
49L smaller total gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a total gross capacity of 309L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 310L total gross capacity fridge freezer (1L larger) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 358L total gross capacity fridge freezer (49L larger).
Smaller net fridge capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a net fridge capacity of 190L, but the Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 166L net fridge capacity fridge freezer (24L smaller) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 219L net fridge capacity fridge freezer (29L larger).
39L smaller fridge gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a fridge gross capacity of 191L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 181L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer (10L smaller) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 230L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer (39L larger).
Only three freezer shelves/baskets Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has three freezer shelves/baskets, and so does the Siemens KG39NAI32, however the Beko CFD 6914 AP only has four freezer shelves/baskets.
Smaller freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 12kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer. That's 6kg/24h bigger than the Beko CFD 6914 AP (14kg/24h) and 2kg/24h smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (14kg/24h).
A little smaller gross freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a gross freezer capacity of 118L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 129L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer (11L bigger) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 128L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer (10L bigger).
£69 more expensive
The Samsung RB29FWRND is more expensive than the Beko CFD 6914 AP by £69.01.
More expensive to run over five years by 12%
The running costs over five years of the Samsung RB29FWRND are £681.50 which is £70.50 more than the Siemens KG39NAI32. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is lower
The Samsung RB29FWRND has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", however the Beko CFD 6914 AP has a rating of "A+" and the Siemens KG39NAI32 has a rating of "A++".
8 Reasons Against
Louder noise level Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 43dB noise level fridge freezer. That's 1dB louder than the Beko CFD 6914 AP (43dB) and 4dB louder than the Samsung RB29FWRND (43dB).
Only three fridge shelves baskets Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a three fridge shelve basket fridge freezer, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND only has four fridge shelves baskets.
4L smaller net freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a net freezer capacity of 94L (as does the Beko CFD 6914 AP), however the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 98L net freezer capacity fridge freezer (4L larger).
12% shorter storage time during power failure Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is an 18h storage time during power failure fridge freezer, and so does the Beko CFD 6914 AP. That's 2h shorter than the Samsung RB29FWRND (18h).
Only three freezer shelves/baskets Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has three freezer shelves/baskets, and so does the Samsung RB29FWRND, however the Beko CFD 6914 AP only has four freezer shelves/baskets.
1L smaller gross freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a gross freezer capacity of 128L, whereas the Beko CFD 6914 AP is a 129L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer (1L bigger) and the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 118L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer (10L smaller).
Not currently available
This fridge freezer does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over three years older
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is older than the Beko CFD 6914 AP by three years and older than the Samsung RB29FWRND by four years.

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 17 months Ago 58 months Ago

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 693.25
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 693.25
Purchase price £ 309.99
Total cost of ownership £ 1,003.24
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 681.50
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 681.50
Purchase price £ 379.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,060.50
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 611.00
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 611.00

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

3.4T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 3.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
88
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
3.4T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 3.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
87
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
3.0T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 3.0 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
78
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Design

Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Colour
 Black
 Graphite
 Metallic
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
 Black
 Graphite
 Metallic
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
 Black
 Graphite
 Metallic
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
Door Hinge
 Right
 Right
 Right
Compressor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Shelve Material
 Glass
 Glass
 Glass
Refrigerating Medium
Unknown - Click to provide data R-600a Unknown - Click to provide data
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
Built-In Display
 Built-in display
 Built-in display
BEST
 Built-in display
BEST
Reversible Door
 Reversible door
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Reversible door

Performance

Total Net Capacity
260L 288L 313L
BEST
Noise Level
42dB 39dB
BEST
43dB
Air Filter
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Air filter
Water Dispenser
 Water dispenser
 Water dispenser
Unknown - Click to provide data
Climate Class
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
Total Gross Capacity
310L 309L 358L
BEST

Fridge

Net Fridge Capacity
166L 190L 219L
BEST
Bottle Rack
 Bottle rack
 Bottle rack
 Bottle rack
Egg Balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
Door Balcony
Unknown - Click to provide data 3 Unknown - Click to provide data
Vegetable Drawer
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge Shelve Basket
4
BEST
4
BEST
3
Fridge Multi-Airflow System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Fridge multi-airflow system
Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge Automatic Defrost Function
 Fridge automatic defrost function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge No Frost
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Fridge no frost
 Fridge no frost
Lamp
 LED
 LED
BEST
 LED
Fridge Interior Light
 Fridge interior light
 Fridge interior light
 Fridge interior light
Fridge Gross Capacity
181L 191L 230L
BEST

Freezer

Net Freezer Capacity
94L 98L
BEST
94L
Storage Time During Power Failure
18h 20h
BEST
18h
Ice Cube Tray
 Ice cube tray
 Ice cube tray
 Ice cube tray
Freezer Shelve/basket
4
BEST
3 3
Freezer No Frost
 Freezer no frost
 Freezer no frost
Unknown - Click to provide data
Star Rating
4 4 4
Freezer Capacity
6kg/24h 12kg/24h 14kg/24h
BEST
Gross Freezer Capacity
129L
BEST
118L 128L
Freezer Position
 Bottom-placed
 Bottom-placed
 Bottom-placed

Fresh Zone

Fresh Zone Compartment
 Fresh zone compartment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2.4m
Adjustable Foot
 Adjustable foot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Temperature Alarm
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Temperature alarm
Door Open Alarm
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Door open alarm
 Door open alarm

Power

AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
AC Input Voltage
 240
 240
 240
Annual Energy Consumption
295kWh 290kWh 260kWh
BEST
Connected Load
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 160W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+++
 A+++
 A+++

Weight & Dimensions

Width
595mm 595mm 600mm
Height
1,900mm 1,780mm 2,000mm
Depth
600mm 668mm 600mm
Weight
65kg 63kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Weight
70kg 66kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
1,980mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
680mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
665mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (without Handle)
Unknown - Click to provide data 668mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Door
 Double
 Double
 Double
Multi-Airflow System
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Multi-airflow system
No Frost System
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 No frost system
Net Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 63 Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 66 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback