Samsung RB29FWRND vs Siemens KG39NAI32

(20)
Samsung RB29FWRND
Siemens KG39NAI32

Top Prices

Currys
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (10 available)
Appliances Direct
Standard delivery: £4.95
In stock
Electrical Discount
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
11% quieter noise level Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 39dB noise level fridge freezer. That's 4dB quieter than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (43dB).
Four fridge shelves baskets Edit
The number of fridge shelves baskets on the Samsung RB29FWRND is four, but the Siemens KG39NAI32 only has three fridge shelves baskets.
4L larger net freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a net freezer capacity of 98L, whereas the Siemens KG39NAI32 is only a 94L net freezer capacity fridge freezer (4L smaller).
Longer storage time during power failure Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 20h storage time during power failure fridge freezer. That's 2h longer than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (18h).
8 Reasons For
25L larger total net capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a total net capacity of 313L, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 288L total net capacity fridge freezer (25L smaller).
Larger total gross capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a total gross capacity of 358L, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 309L total gross capacity fridge freezer (49L smaller).
14% larger net fridge capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a net fridge capacity of 219L, however the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 190L net fridge capacity fridge freezer (29L smaller).
Larger fridge gross capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a fridge gross capacity of 230L, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 191L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer (39L smaller).
15% bigger freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 14kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer. That's 2kg/24h bigger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (14kg/24h).
Moderately bigger gross freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a gross freezer capacity of 128L, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 118L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer (10L smaller).
Cheaper to run by £70.50
The Siemens KG39NAI32 only costs £611.00 to run over five years however the Samsung RB29FWRND costs £681.50 to run (12% more). Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Siemens KG39NAI32 is "A++", whereas the rating of the Samsung RB29FWRND is "A+".

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
A little smaller total net capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a total net capacity of 288L, but the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 313L total net capacity fridge freezer (25L larger).
Smaller total gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a total gross capacity of 309L, but the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 358L total gross capacity fridge freezer (49L larger).
16% smaller net fridge capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a net fridge capacity of 190L, however the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 219L net fridge capacity fridge freezer (29L larger).
Smaller fridge gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a fridge gross capacity of 191L, but the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 230L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer (39L larger).
17% smaller freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 12kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer. That's 2kg/24h smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (14kg/24h).
10L smaller gross freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a gross freezer capacity of 118L, but the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 128L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer (10L bigger).
12% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Samsung RB29FWRND are £681.50 which is £70.50 more than the Siemens KG39NAI32 over five years. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is worse
The Samsung RB29FWRND has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the Siemens KG39NAI32 has a rating of "A++".
6 Reasons Against
10% louder noise level Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 43dB noise level fridge freezer. That's 4dB louder than the Samsung RB29FWRND (43dB).
Only three fridge shelves baskets Edit
The number of fridge shelves baskets on the Siemens KG39NAI32 is three, but the Samsung RB29FWRND only has four fridge shelves baskets.
Marginally smaller net freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a net freezer capacity of 94L, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 98L net freezer capacity fridge freezer (4L larger).
2h shorter storage time during power failure Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is an 18h storage time during power failure fridge freezer. That's 2h shorter than the Samsung RB29FWRND (18h).
Not currently available
This fridge freezer does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over three years older
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is older than the Samsung RB29FWRND by four years.

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

17 months Ago 58 months Ago

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 681.50
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 681.50
Purchase price £ 379.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,060.50
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 611.00
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 611.00

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

3.4T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 3.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
87
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
3.0T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 3.0 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
78
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Design

Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Colour
 Graphite
 Metallic
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
 Graphite
 Metallic
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
Door Hinge
 Right
 Right
Compressor
1 1
Shelve Material
 Glass
 Glass
Refrigerating Medium
R-600a Unknown - Click to provide data
Display
 LED
 LED
Built-In Display
 Built-in display
 Built-in display
Reversible Door
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Reversible door

Performance

Total Net Capacity
288L 313L
BEST
Noise Level
39dB
BEST
43dB
Air Filter
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Air filter
Water Dispenser
 Water dispenser
Unknown - Click to provide data
Climate Class
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
Total Gross Capacity
309L 358L
BEST

Fridge

Net Fridge Capacity
190L 219L
BEST
Bottle Rack
 Bottle rack
 Bottle rack
Egg Balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
Door Balcony
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
Vegetable Drawer
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge Shelve Basket
4
BEST
3
Fridge Multi-Airflow System
 Fridge multi-airflow system
Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge No Frost
 Fridge no frost
 Fridge no frost
Lamp
 LED
BEST
 LED
Fridge Interior Light
 Fridge interior light
 Fridge interior light
Fridge Gross Capacity
191L 230L
BEST

Freezer

Net Freezer Capacity
98L
BEST
94L
Storage Time During Power Failure
20h
BEST
18h
Ice Cube Tray
 Ice cube tray
 Ice cube tray
Freezer Shelve/basket
3 3
Freezer No Frost
 Freezer no frost
Unknown - Click to provide data
Star Rating
4 4
Freezer Capacity
12kg/24h 14kg/24h
BEST
Gross Freezer Capacity
118L 128L
BEST
Freezer Position
 Bottom-placed
 Bottom-placed

Ergonomics

Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data 2.4m
Temperature Alarm
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Temperature alarm
Door Open Alarm
 Door open alarm
 Door open alarm

Power

AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
AC Input Voltage
 240
 240
Annual Energy Consumption
290kWh 260kWh
BEST
Connected Load
Unknown - Click to provide data 160W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+++
 A+++

Weight & Dimensions

Width
595mm 600mm
Height
1,780mm 2,000mm
Depth
668mm 600mm
Weight
63kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Weight
66kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (without Handle)
668mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Door
 Double
 Double
Multi-Airflow System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Multi-airflow system
No Frost System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No frost system
Net Weight
63 Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
66 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback