Samsung RB29FWRND vs Samsung RB31FERNB vs Siemens KG39NAI32

(20)
Samsung RB29FWRND
Samsung RB31FERNB
Siemens KG39NAI32

Top Prices

eBay
Power Direct
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Appliances Direct
Standard delivery: £4.95
In stock
Elekdirect
Delivery unknown
ComWales
Delivery unknown
In stock
John Lewis
FREE Standard delivery
In stock, only 1 left!

Reasons For

9 Reasons For
11% quieter noise level Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a noise level of 39dB, however the Samsung RB31FERNB is a 40dB noise level fridge freezer (1dB louder) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 43dB noise level fridge freezer (4dB louder).
Water dispenser Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a water dispenser, however the Samsung RB31FERNB does not have a water dispenser. Read more

A stand-alone or a built-in device thatdispenses water. Sometimes it may cool water.

One more fridge shelve basket Edit
The number of fridge shelves baskets on the Samsung RB29FWRND is four, but the Siemens KG39NAI32 only has three fridge shelves baskets. Read more

We do not know the number of fridge shelves baskets on the Samsung RB31FERNB. It is possible that it does not have any fridge shelves baskets.

5% larger net freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 98L net freezer capacity fridge freezer, and so does the Samsung RB31FERNB. That's 4L larger than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (94L).
Marginally narrower Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a width of 595mm (as does the Samsung RB31FERNB), however the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 600mm wide fridge freezer (5mm wider).
13% shorter Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a height of 1,780mm. That's 70mm shorter than the Samsung RB31FERNB (2,000mm) and 220mm shorter than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (2,000mm).
2kg lighter Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a weight of 63kg, however the Samsung RB31FERNB is a 65kg heavy fridge freezer (2kg heavier).
Cheaper by £249
The Samsung RB29FWRND is £249.32 cheaper than the Samsung RB31FERNB and £454 cheaper than the Siemens KG39NAI32.
28 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this fridge freezer remaining in stock.
6 Reasons For
One more vegetable drawer Edit
The number of vegetable drawers on the Samsung RB31FERNB is two, but the Samsung RB29FWRND only has one vegetable drawer. Read more

We do not know the number of vegetable drawers on the Siemens KG39NAI32. It is possible that it does not have any vegetable drawers.

Larger net freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB is a 98L net freezer capacity fridge freezer, and so does the Samsung RB29FWRND. That's 4L larger than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (94L).
25% longer storage time during power failure Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB has a storage time during power failure of 24h, however the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 20h storage time during power failure fridge freezer (4h shorter) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is only an 18h storage time during power failure fridge freezer (6h shorter).
5mm narrower Edit
Samsung RB31FERNB is 595mm wide (as does the Samsung RB29FWRND), but the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 600mm wide fridge freezer (5mm wider).
41% cheaper to run
Over five years the Samsung RB31FERNB is £277.30 cheaper to run than the Samsung RB29FWRND and £206.80 cheaper to run than the Siemens KG39NAI32. Read more
Energy efficiency rating is better
The Samsung RB31FERNB has an energy efficiency rating of "A+++", however the Samsung RB29FWRND has a rating of "A+" and the Siemens KG39NAI32 has a rating of "A++".
7 Reasons For
8% larger total net capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 313L total net capacity fridge freezer. That's 25L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (313L) and 9L larger than the Samsung RB31FERNB (313L).
Larger total gross capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 358L total gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 49L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (358L) and 33L larger than the Samsung RB31FERNB (358L).
14% larger net fridge capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 219L net fridge capacity fridge freezer. That's 29L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (219L) and 13L larger than the Samsung RB31FERNB (219L).
Larger fridge gross capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 230L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 39L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (230L) and 23L larger than the Samsung RB31FERNB (230L).
15% bigger freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a freezer capacity of 14kg/24h, however the Samsung RB29FWRND is only a 12kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (2kg/24h smaller) and the Samsung RB31FERNB is only a 13kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (1kg/24h smaller).
Bigger gross freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 128L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer. That's 10L bigger than the Samsung RB29FWRND and the Samsung RB31FERNB (128L).
Shallower Edit
Siemens KG39NAI32 is 600mm deep, but the Samsung RB29FWRND and the Samsung RB31FERNB are both 668mm deep fridge freezers (68mm deeper).

Reasons Against

11 Reasons Against
Smaller total net capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 288L total net capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L smaller than the Samsung RB31FERNB (313L) and 25L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (313L).
Smaller total gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 309L total gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L smaller than the Samsung RB31FERNB (358L) and 49L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (358L).
16% smaller net fridge capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 190L net fridge capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L smaller than the Samsung RB31FERNB (219L) and 29L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (219L).
One less vegetable drawer Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has one vegetable drawer, however the Samsung RB31FERNB only has two vegetable drawers. Read more

We do not know the number of vegetable drawers on the Siemens KG39NAI32. It is possible that it does not have any vegetable drawers.

Smaller fridge gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 191L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L smaller than the Samsung RB31FERNB (230L) and 39L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (230L).
4h shorter storage time during power failure Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a storage time during power failure of 20h, whereas the Samsung RB31FERNB is a 24h storage time during power failure fridge freezer (4h longer) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is an 18h storage time during power failure fridge freezer (2h shorter).
17% smaller freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND has a freezer capacity of 12kg/24h, however the Samsung RB31FERNB is a 13kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (1kg/24h bigger) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 14kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (2kg/24h bigger).
9% smaller gross freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB29FWRND is a 118L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer, and so does the Samsung RB31FERNB. That's 10L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (128L).
Deeper Edit
Samsung RB29FWRND is 668mm deep (as does the Samsung RB31FERNB), but the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 600mm deep fridge freezer (68mm shallower).
£277.30 more expensive to run over five years
The Samsung RB29FWRND costs £681.50 to run which is £277.30 more to run than the Samsung RB31FERNB and £70.50 more to run than the Siemens KG39NAI32 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Samsung RB29FWRND is "A+", whereas the rating of the Samsung RB31FERNB is "A+++" and the rating of the Siemens KG39NAI32 is "A++".
14 Reasons Against
3% smaller total net capacity Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB is a 304L total net capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (313L) and 9L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (313L).
Slightly louder noise level Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB has a noise level of 40dB, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 39dB noise level fridge freezer (1dB quieter) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 43dB noise level fridge freezer (3dB louder).
Does not have a water dispenser Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB does not have a water dispenser, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND does. Read more

A stand-alone or a built-in device thatdispenses water. Sometimes it may cool water.

33L smaller total gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB is a 325L total gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (358L) and 33L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (358L).
7% smaller net fridge capacity Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB is a 206L net fridge capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (219L) and 13L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (219L).
23L smaller fridge gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB is a 207L fridge gross capacity fridge freezer. That's 16L larger than the Samsung RB29FWRND (230L) and 23L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (230L).
1kg/24h smaller freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB has a freezer capacity of 13kg/24h, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 12kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (1kg/24h smaller) and the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 14kg/24h freezer capacity fridge freezer (1kg/24h bigger).
Smaller gross freezer capacity Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB is a 118L gross freezer capacity fridge freezer, and so does the Samsung RB29FWRND. That's 10L smaller than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (128L).
4% taller Edit
Samsung RB31FERNB is 1,850mm tall. That's 70mm taller than the Samsung RB29FWRND (2,000mm) and 150mm shorter than the Siemens KG39NAI32 (2,000mm).
68mm deeper Edit
The Samsung RB31FERNB is a 668mm deep fridge freezer (as does the Samsung RB29FWRND), whereas the Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 600mm deep fridge freezer (68mm shallower).
Slightly heavier Edit
Samsung RB31FERNB is 65kg heavy, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 63kg heavy fridge freezer (2kg lighter).
More expensive by £249
The Samsung RB31FERNB is £249.32 more expensive than the Samsung RB29FWRND.
Less retailers
The Samsung RB31FERNB is only stocked by 1 seller, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND is stocked by 29 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this fridge freezer remaining in stock.
Older by over two years
The Samsung RB31FERNB is three years older than the Samsung RB29FWRND.
11 Reasons Against
Moderately louder noise level Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a noise level of 43dB, however the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 39dB noise level fridge freezer (4dB quieter) and the Samsung RB31FERNB is a 40dB noise level fridge freezer (3dB quieter).
One less fridge shelve basket Edit
The number of fridge shelves baskets on the Siemens KG39NAI32 is three, but the Samsung RB29FWRND only has four fridge shelves baskets. Read more

We do not know the number of fridge shelves baskets on the Samsung RB31FERNB. It is possible that it does not have any fridge shelves baskets.

Smaller net freezer capacity Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is a 94L net freezer capacity fridge freezer. That's 4L smaller than the Samsung RB29FWRND and the Samsung RB31FERNB (94L).
A lot shorter storage time during power failure Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a storage time during power failure of 18h, whereas the Samsung RB29FWRND is a 20h storage time during power failure fridge freezer (2h longer) and the Samsung RB31FERNB is a 24h storage time during power failure fridge freezer (6h longer).
5mm wider Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a width of 600mm, however the Samsung RB29FWRND and the Samsung RB31FERNB are both 595mm wide fridge freezers (5mm narrower).
11% taller Edit
The Siemens KG39NAI32 has a height of 2,000mm. That's 220mm taller than the Samsung RB29FWRND (2,000mm) and 150mm taller than the Samsung RB31FERNB (2,000mm).
More expensive by £454
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is £454 more expensive than the Samsung RB29FWRND and £204.68 more expensive than the Samsung RB31FERNB.
Fewer sellers
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is only stocked by 1 retailer, but the Samsung RB29FWRND is stocked by 29 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by over three years
The Siemens KG39NAI32 is four years older than the Samsung RB29FWRND and ten months older than the Samsung RB31FERNB.
Higher running costs over five years by £206.80
The Siemens KG39NAI32 costs £611.00 to run which is £206.80 more to run than the Samsung RB31FERNB over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Siemens KG39NAI32 is "A++", whereas the rating of the Samsung RB29FWRND is "A+" and the rating of the Samsung RB31FERNB is "A+++".

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

16 months Ago 48 months Ago 58 months Ago

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 681.50
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 681.50
Purchase price £ 295.00
Total cost of ownership £ 976.50
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 404.20
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 404.20
Purchase price £ 544.32
Total cost of ownership £ 948.52
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 611.00
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 611.00
Purchase price £ 749.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,360.00
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

3.4T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 3.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
87
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
2.0T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 2.0 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
51
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
3.0T
Running this fridge freezer over 10 years will generate 3.0 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
78
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Design

Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Colour
 Graphite
 Metallic
 White
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
 Graphite
 Metallic
 White
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
 Graphite
 Metallic
 White
 Chrome
 Stainless steel
Door Hinge
 Right
 Right
 Right
Compressor
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Shelve Material
 Glass
 Glass
 Glass
Refrigerating Medium
R-600a R-600a Unknown - Click to provide data
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
Built-In Display
 Built-in display
 Built-in display
 Built-in display
Reversible Door
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Reversible door
 Reversible door

Performance

Total Net Capacity
288L 304L 313L
BEST
Noise Level
39dB
BEST
40dB 43dB
Air Filter
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Air filter
Water Dispenser
 Water dispenser
BEST
 Water dispenser
Unknown - Click to provide data
Climate Class
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
 T
 SN
 ST
 SN (Subnormal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T (Tropical)
 SN (Subnormal) - T (Tropical)
Total Gross Capacity
309L 325L 358L
BEST

Fridge

Net Fridge Capacity
190L 206L 219L
BEST
Interior Light
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Interior light
Bottle Rack
 Bottle rack
 Bottle rack
 Bottle rack
Egg Balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
Door Balcony
3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Vegetable Drawer
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge Shelve Basket
4
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
Fridge Multi-Airflow System
 Fridge multi-airflow system
 Fridge multi-airflow system
Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge No Frost
 Fridge no frost
 Fridge no frost
 Fridge no frost
Lamp
 LED
BEST
 LED
BEST
 LED
Fridge Interior Light
 Fridge interior light
 Fridge interior light
 Fridge interior light
Fridge Gross Capacity
191L 207L 230L
BEST

Freezer

Net Freezer Capacity
98L
BEST
98L
BEST
94L
Storage Time During Power Failure
20h 24h
BEST
18h
Autonomy Time
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 18h
Ice Cube Tray
 Ice cube tray
 Ice cube tray
 Ice cube tray
Freezer Shelve/basket
3 3 3
Freezer No Frost
 Freezer no frost
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Star Rating
4 4 4
Freezer Capacity
12kg/24h 13kg/24h 14kg/24h
BEST
Gross Freezer Capacity
118L 118L 128L
BEST
Freezer Position
 Bottom-placed
 Bottom-placed
 Bottom-placed

Ergonomics

Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2.4m
Temperature Alarm
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Temperature alarm
Door Open Alarm
 Door open alarm
 Door open alarm
 Door open alarm

Power

AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
AC Input Voltage
 240
 240
 240
Typical Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 160W
Annual Energy Consumption
290kWh 172kWh
BEST
260kWh
Connected Load
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 160W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+++
 A+++
 A+++

Weight & Dimensions

Width
595mm
BEST
595mm
BEST
600mm
Height
1,780mm
BEST
1,850mm 2,000mm
Depth
668mm 668mm 600mm
BEST
Weight
63kg
BEST
65kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Weight
66kg
BEST
68kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,916mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 758mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 637mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (without Handle)
668mm 668mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Door
 Double
 Double
 Double
Form Factor
 Upright
 Upright
 Upright
Multi-Airflow System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Multi-airflow system
 Multi-airflow system
No Frost System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No frost system
 No frost system
Net Weight
63 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
66 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback