Exquisit EKS 201 vs Neff KL 415A

Exquisit EKS 201
Neff KL 415A

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £5.90
In stock
ComWales
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Shorter Edit
The Exquisit EKS 201 is a 1,220mm high fridge. That's 1mm shorter than the Neff KL 415A (1,221mm).
1% narrower Edit
Exquisit EKS 201 is 540mm wide. That's 1mm narrower than the Neff KL 415A (541mm).
Lighter Edit
The Exquisit EKS 201 is a 41kg weight fridge. That's 1kg lighter than the Neff KL 415A (42kg).
7 Reasons For
Six shelves/basketss Edit
The number of shelves/basketss on the Neff KL 415A is six, but the Exquisit EKS 201 only has four shelves/basketss.
6L bigger net capacity Edit
The Neff KL 415A has a net capacity of 221L, whereas the Exquisit EKS 201 is only a 215L net capacity fridge (6L smaller).
Lower connected load Edit
The Neff KL 415A is a 90W fridge. That's 50W lower than the Exquisit EKS 201 (90W).
Slightly shallower Edit
The Neff KL 415A is a 542mm deep fridge, whereas the Exquisit EKS 201 is a 545mm deep fridge (3mm deeper).
Cheaper by £103
The Neff KL 415A is £103.08 cheaper than the Exquisit EKS 201.
Cheaper to run by £49.58
Over five years the Neff KL 415A is £49.58 cheaper to run than the Exquisit EKS 201. Read more
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Neff KL 415A has an energy efficiency rating of "A++", whereas the Exquisit EKS 201 has a rating of "A+".

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Two less shelves/basketss Edit
The number of shelves/basketss on the Exquisit EKS 201 is four, but the Neff KL 415A only has six shelves/basketss.
Smaller net capacity Edit
The Exquisit EKS 201 is a 215L net capacity fridge. That's 6L smaller than the Neff KL 415A (221L).
A lot higher connected load Edit
The Exquisit EKS 201 has a connected load of 140W, whereas the Neff KL 415A is a 90W fridge (50W lower).
1% deeper Edit
The Exquisit EKS 201 is a 545mm deep fridge. That's 3mm deeper than the Neff KL 415A (542mm).
£103 more expensive
The Exquisit EKS 201 is more expensive than the Neff KL 415A by £103.08.
More expensive to run over five years by 20%
The running costs over five years of the Exquisit EKS 201 are £291.63 which is £49.58 more than the Neff KL 415A. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is worse
The Exquisit EKS 201 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the Neff KL 415A has a rating of "A++".
3 Reasons Against
1mm taller Edit
The Neff KL 415A is a 1,221mm high fridge, whereas the Exquisit EKS 201 is a 1,220mm high fridge (1mm shorter).
Marginally wider Edit
Neff KL 415A is 541mm wide, but the Exquisit EKS 201 is a 540mm wide fridge (1mm narrower).
1kg heavier Edit
The Neff KL 415A has a weight of 42kg, but the Exquisit EKS 201 is a 41kg weight fridge (1kg lighter).

Date Released

41 months Ago 41 months Ago

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 291.63
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 291.63
Purchase price £ 433.73
Total cost of ownership £ 725.36
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 242.05
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 242.05
Purchase price £ 330.65
Total cost of ownership £ 572.70
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

1.4T
Running this fridge over 10 years will generate 1.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
37
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.2T
Running this fridge over 10 years will generate 1.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
31
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Design

Case
 Built-in
 Built-in
Type
 Upright
 Upright
Water Dispenser
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Water dispenser
Shelve Material
 Glass
 Glass
Egg Balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
Number of Vegetable Drawer
1 1
Shelves/baskets
4 6
BEST
Control
 Rotary
 Rotary
Reversible Door
 Reversible door
 Reversible door
Door Hinge
 Right
 Right
Colour
 White
 White

Performance

Net Capacity
215L 221L
BEST
Noise Level
Unknown - Click to provide data 37dB
Automatic Defrost Function
 Automatic defrost function
 Automatic defrost function
Climate Class
 T
 ST
 N (Normal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 N (Normal) - ST (Subtropical)
 SN
 SN (Subnormal)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
 T
 ST
 N (Normal)
 ST (Subtropical)
 N (Normal) - ST (Subtropical)
 SN
 SN (Subnormal)
 SN (Subnormal) - ST (Subtropical)
Gross Capacity
Unknown - Click to provide data 227L

Ergonomics

Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data 2.3m
Interior Light
 Interior light
 Interior light

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A++
 A+
 A++
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
124.1kWh 103kWh
BEST
Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 10A
Energy Usage
0.34kWh/24h Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 20-24
 20-24
Connected Load
140W 90W
BEST

Weight & Dimensions

Height
1,220mm
BEST
1,221mm
Width
540mm
BEST
541mm
Depth
545mm 542mm
BEST
Weight
41kg
BEST
42kg
Package Weight
47kg 45kg
BEST
Package Height
1,270mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
600mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
580mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Installation Compartment Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,225mm
Installation Compartment Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 550mm
Installation Compartment Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 560mm
Depth With Door Open
1,080mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Compressor
1 1
Feedback