Candy FXP 609 X vs Whirlpool AKZM 755

(4)
Candy FXP 609 X
Whirlpool AKZM 755

Top Prices

Power Direct
FREE Standard delivery
Appliances Direct
Standard delivery: £4.95
The Gas Superstore
Delivery unknown
In stock
The Wright Buy
Delivery unknown
In stock
The Gas Superstore
Delivery unknown
In stock
Gillmans
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
5L bigger interior capacity Edit
The Candy FXP 609 X has an interior capacity of 78L, however the Whirlpool AKZM 755 is only a 73L interior capacity oven (5L smaller). Read more

The interior capacity of an oven is the total space inside all of the oven compartments measured in litres.

A bigger oven capacity will allow more food to be cooked and will allow larger items such as turkeys to fit inside the oven.

0.01kWh lower conventional energy consumption Edit
The Candy FXP 609 X has a conventional energy consumption of 0.9kWh, but the Whirlpool AKZM 755 is a 0.91kWh conventional energy consumption oven (0.01kWh higher).
35% lighter Edit
The Candy FXP 609 X is a 30kg weight oven. That's 10.5kg lighter than the Whirlpool AKZM 755 (40.5kg).
Cheaper by £72
The Candy FXP 609 X is £72 cheaper than the Whirlpool AKZM 755.
3 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this oven remaining in stock.
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Candy FXP 609 X has an energy efficiency rating of "A++", whereas the Whirlpool AKZM 755 has a rating of "A+".
1 Reason For
15% lower forced convection energy consumption Edit
The Whirlpool AKZM 755 is a 0.7kWh forced convection energy consumption oven. That's 0.1kWh lower than the Candy FXP 609 X (0.7kWh).

Reasons Against

1 Reason Against
13% higher forced convection energy consumption Edit
The Candy FXP 609 X has a forced convection energy consumption of 0.8kWh, however the Whirlpool AKZM 755 is a 0.7kWh forced convection energy consumption oven (0.1kWh lower).
7 Reasons Against
7% smaller interior capacity Edit
The Whirlpool AKZM 755 is a 73L interior capacity oven. That's 5L smaller than the Candy FXP 609 X (73L). Read more

The interior capacity of an oven is the total space inside all of the oven compartments measured in litres.

A bigger oven capacity will allow more food to be cooked and will allow larger items such as turkeys to fit inside the oven.

2% higher conventional energy consumption Edit
The Whirlpool AKZM 755 is a 0.91kWh conventional energy consumption oven. That's 0.01kWh higher than the Candy FXP 609 X (0.91kWh).
A lot heavier Edit
The Whirlpool AKZM 755 has a weight of 40.5kg, but the Candy FXP 609 X is a 30kg weight oven (10.5kg lighter).
£72 more expensive
The Whirlpool AKZM 755 is more expensive than the Candy FXP 609 X by £72.
Fewer sellers
Only 3 sellers sells the Whirlpool AKZM 755, but 6 shops sell the Candy FXP 609 X. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this oven, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
One month older
The Whirlpool AKZM 755 is older than the Candy FXP 609 X by one month.
Energy efficiency rating is worse
The Whirlpool AKZM 755 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the Candy FXP 609 X has a rating of "A++".

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

37 months Ago 38 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Oven

Interior Capacity
78L
BEST
73L
Oven Type
 Electric
 Electric
Separate Oven
1 1
Interior Light
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Interior light
Primary Oven Capacity
Unknown - Click to provide data 73L
Oven Size
 Medium
 Medium
BEST

Design

Lamp
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
BEST
Built-In Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in display
Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3m
Integrated Clock
 Electronic
 Electronic
Control Position
 Top front
 Top front
Control Type
 Rotary
 Buttons
 Rotary
 Buttons
Oven Colour
 Black
 Grey
 Silver
 Stainless steel
 Black
 Grey
 Silver
 Stainless steel
Case Design
 Built-in
 Built-in

Ergonomics

Timer
 Electronic
 Electronic

Performance

Top and Bottom Heating
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Top and bottom heating

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+++
BEST
 A+++
Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 13A
Forced Convection Energy Consumption
0.8kWh 0.7kWh
BEST
Conventional Energy Consumption
0.9kWh
BEST
0.91kWh
Connected Load
Unknown - Click to provide data 2,600W

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
32kg
BEST
42.5kg
Height
595mm 595mm
Depth
568mm 564mm
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 690mm
Width
595mm 595mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 650mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 630mm
Weight
30kg
BEST
40.5kg
Installation Compartment Height
580mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Installation Compartment Depth
560mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Installation Compartment Width
560mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Cooking Functions & Programs

Defrost Function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Defrost function
Conventional Cooking
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Conventional cooking
Grill
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Grill
Convection Cooking
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Convection cooking

Bread Machine

Bread Making Capability
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bread making capability
Feedback