DELL P2415Q vs Samsung U24E850R

(56)
(24)
DELL P2415Q
Samsung U24E850R

Top Prices

eBay
Standard delivery: £22.00
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (96 available)
INTECHGROUPLLC
Delivery unknown
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Ebuyer
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 5 left!
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Flubit Deals
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

13 Reasons For
Marginally bigger screen size Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a screen size of 23.8", whereas the Samsung U24E850R is only a 23.5" PC monitor (0.3" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2% bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 296.46mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 3.24mm bigger than the Samsung U24E850R (293.22mm).
A bit bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a viewable width of 527.04mm, but the Samsung U24E850R is only a 521.28mm viewable width PC monitor (5.76mm smaller).
1.47cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a display diagonal of 60.47cm, whereas the Samsung U24E850R is only a 59cm display diagonal PC monitor (1.47cm smaller).
One more DisplayPort Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Samsung U24E850R only has one DisplayPort.
Lighter Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 870g lighter than the Samsung U24E850R (4.2kg).
Moderately shorter Edit
DELL P2415Q is 336.06mm tall, but the Samsung U24E850R is a 336.1mm tall PC monitor (0.04000000000002mm taller).
Shallower Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 46.93mm deep PC monitor. That's 12.37mm shallower than the Samsung U24E850R (59.3mm).
£42 cheaper
The DELL P2415Q is £42.07 cheaper than the Samsung U24E850R.
Available from 16 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
More popular
The DELL P2415Q is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 9778 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the Samsung U24E850R ranks No. 19794.
Expert reviews are significantly better
Based on 1 expert review, the DELL P2415Q has an average review score of 84%, whereas the Samsung U24E850R has an average rating of 60% (based on 1 review).
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 55 user reviews, the DELL P2415Q has an average review score of 88%, whereas the Samsung U24E850R has an average rating of 77% (based on 23 reviews).
6 Reasons For
Vastly more display colour count Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a display colour count of 16.77M, however the DELL P2415Q is only a unknownM display colours PC monitor (16.77M less).
4ms faster response time Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a response time of 4ms, whereas the DELL P2415Q is an 8ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Larger color gamut Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a color gamut of 98%, but the DELL P2415Q is only a unknown% color gamut PC monitor (98% smaller).
130mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a maximum height adjustment of 130mm, whereas the DELL P2415Q is only a unknownmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (130mm lower).
Hugely lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung U24E850R is a 0.45W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 89.55W lower than the DELL P2415Q (0.45W).
2% narrower Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a width of 561mm. That's 5.64mm narrower than the DELL P2415Q (561mm).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL P2415Q is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Samsung U24E850R (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

89.55W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a maximum power consumption of 90W, whereas the Samsung U24E850R is a 0.45W maximum power consumption PC monitor (89.55W lower).
5.64mm wider Edit
DELL P2415Q is 566.64mm wide, but the Samsung U24E850R is a 561mm wide PC monitor (5.64mm narrower).
Three months older
The DELL P2415Q is older than the Samsung U24E850R by three months.
13 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung U24E850R is a 23.5" PC monitor. That's 0.3" smaller than the DELL P2415Q (23.5"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Moderately smaller viewable height Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a viewable height of 293.22mm, but the DELL P2415Q is a 296.46mm viewable height PC monitor (3.24mm bigger).
Smaller viewable width Edit
The Samsung U24E850R is a 521.28mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 5.76mm smaller than the DELL P2415Q (521.28mm).
3% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung U24E850R is a 59cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 1.47cm smaller than the DELL P2415Q (59cm).
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the Samsung U24E850R is one, but the DELL P2415Q only has two DisplayPorts.
Heavier Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a weight of 4.2kg, but the DELL P2415Q is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor (870g lighter).
Taller Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a height of 336.1mm. That's 0.04000000000002mm taller than the DELL P2415Q (336.1mm).
Deeper Edit
Samsung U24E850R is 59.3mm deep, but the DELL P2415Q is a 46.93mm deep PC monitor (12.37mm shallower).
More expensive by £42
The Samsung U24E850R is £42.07 more expensive than the DELL P2415Q.
Not as many stockists
The Samsung U24E850R is only stocked by 21 retailers, however the DELL P2415Q is stocked by 37 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Less popular
The Samsung U24E850R is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 19794 by number of sales in our PC monitors, but the DELL P2415Q ranks No. 9778.
Expert review Rating is hugely Worse
The Samsung U24E850R only has an average expert score of 60%, but the DELL P2415Q has an average expert rating of 84% (based on 1 review).
User review Rating is much Worse
The Samsung U24E850R only has an average user score of 77%, but the DELL P2415Q has an average user rating of 88% (based on 55 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

25 months Ago 21 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 72.11
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 75.15
Purchase price £ 289.19
Total cost of ownership £ 364.34
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.37T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.37 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
23.8"
BEST
23.5"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
SRGB Display Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 SRGB display feature
Viewable Height
296.46mm
BEST
293.22mm
Viewable Width
527.04mm
BEST
521.28mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.13725 x 0.13725 0.4525 x 0.13575
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
60.47cm
BEST
59cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 98%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 250
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Output Port
 Audio output port
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
2
BEST
1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
1 1
Mini DisplayPort
1 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating system
Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN port
WiFi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 WiFi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture mode
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1.5 - 91.5
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 22
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -25 - 25
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Current Rating
1.8A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
45W 41W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 59kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
90W 0.45W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 35 10 - 40

Certificates

Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 VCCI
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 VCCI
 C-Tick
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 9.6kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 497mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 320mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 634mm
Weight With Stand
8.7kg 6.7kg
BEST
Height With Stand
369.53mm
BEST
397.2mm
Depth With Stand
205mm
BEST
260.6mm
Width With Stand
566.64mm 561mm
BEST
Weight
3.3kg
BEST
4.2kg
Height
336.06mm
BEST
336.1mm
Depth
46.93mm
BEST
59.3mm
Width
566.64mm 561mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 USB
 AC
Manual Included
 Manual included
 Manual included
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicRotation Auto
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 521.28 x 293.22
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback