Acer S276HL vs HP ENVY 34

(5)
(5)
Acer S276HL
HP ENVY 34

Top Prices

No prices found
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Debenhams Plus
FREE Standard delivery
John Lewis
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (65 available)
Microsoft Store UK
Out of stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Hugely faster response time Edit
The Acer S276HL has a response time of 6ms, but the HP ENVY 34 is a 14ms response time PC monitor (8ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two times lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer S276HL is a 38kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 53kWh lower than the HP ENVY 34 (91kWh).
41% cheaper to run
Over five years the Acer S276HL is £41.60 cheaper to run than the HP ENVY 34. Read more
7 Reasons For
7" bigger screen size Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 34" PC monitor. That's 7" bigger than the Acer S276HL (34"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

17.76cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is an 86.36cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 17.76cm bigger than the Acer S276HL (86.36cm).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 100 cd/m² brighter than the Acer S276HL (350 cd/m²).
Swivelling base Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a swivelling base, however the Acer S276HL does not have a swivelling base.
VESA mounting Edit
The HP ENVY 34 supports VESA mounting, but the Acer S276HL does not support VESA mounting.
Lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 0.43W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.02W lower than the Acer S276HL (0.43W).
Significantly better expert reviews
Based on 3 expert reviews, the average review score of the HP ENVY 34 is 90%, whereas the average rating of the Acer S276HL is 70% (based on 5 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
26% smaller screen size Edit
The Acer S276HL is a 27" PC monitor. That's 7" smaller than the HP ENVY 34 (34"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer S276HL is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 17.76cm smaller than the HP ENVY 34 (86.36cm).
40% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer S276HL is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the HP ENVY 34 (350 cd/m²).
Does not have a swivelling base Edit
The Acer S276HL does not have a swivelling base, whereas the HP ENVY 34 has a swivelling base.
Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The Acer S276HL does not support VESA mounting, however the HP ENVY 34 supports VESA mounting.
5% higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer S276HL is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.02W higher than the HP ENVY 34 (0.43W).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by four months
The Acer S276HL is four months older than the HP ENVY 34.
Expert review Rating is vastly Worse
The Acer S276HL's average expert score is only 70%, however the HP ENVY 34's is 90% (based on 3 reviews).
3 Reasons Against
8ms slower response time Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a response time of 14ms, however the Acer S276HL is a 6ms response time PC monitor (8ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

59% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 91kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 53kWh higher than the Acer S276HL (91kWh).
£41.60 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the HP ENVY 34 costs £102.27 to run which is £41.60 more to run than the Acer S276HL. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

27 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 57.69
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.98
Total running cost £ 60.67
Electricity cost - switched on £ 99.35
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.92
Total running cost £ 102.27
Purchase price £ 699.97
Total cost of ownership £ 802.24
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.51T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.51 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 34"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D compatible
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3440 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3440 x 1440
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.232 x 0.232
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
68.6cm 86.36cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms
BEST
14ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Integrated TV Tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated TV tuner

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
 Ethernet LAN port
Unknown - Click to provide data
WiFi
 WiFi
Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
BEST
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -180 - 180
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicator
 LED indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.45W 0.43W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
36W
BEST
62W
Standby Power Consumption
0.49W 0.48W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
38kWh
BEST
91kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 150W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
6.8kg
BEST
9.8kg
Height With Stand
450mm
BEST
477.1mm
Depth With Stand
142mm
BEST
197.2mm
Width With Stand
622mm
BEST
950.8mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 374.1mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 93.9mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 950.8mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 MHL
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 MHL
Manual Included
 Manual included
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback