HP ENVY 34 vs NEC 322UHD

HP ENVY 34
NEC 322UHD

Top Prices

Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Debenhams Plus
FREE Standard delivery
eBay
Standard delivery: £199.09
Microsoft Store UK
Out of stock
Wex Photographic
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
jigsaw24
Out of stock
Cherrywood AV
Out of stock

Reasons For

12 Reasons For
2.5" bigger screen size Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a screen size of 34", but the NEC 322UHD is only a 31.5" PC monitor (2.5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 2° wider than the NEC 322UHD (176°).
2° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, but the NEC 322UHD is only a 176° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (2° narrower).
Slightly bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a display diagonal of 86.36cm, but the NEC 322UHD is only an 80.01cm display diagonal PC monitor (6.35cm smaller).
Significantly lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has an annual energy consumption of 91kWh, whereas the NEC 322UHD is a 139kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (48kWh higher).
12.5kg lighter Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is an 8kg weight PC monitor. That's 12.5kg lighter than the NEC 322UHD (20.5kg).
94.9mm shorter Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a height of 374.1mm, however the NEC 322UHD is a 469mm tall PC monitor (94.9mm taller).
Shallower Edit
HP ENVY 34 is 93.9mm deep. That's 208.1mm shallower than the NEC 322UHD (302mm).
£2,342 cheaper
The HP ENVY 34 costs £699.97, whereas the NEC 322UHD is £3,042.00.
Available from 12 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
£80.41 cheaper to run
The HP ENVY 34 only costs £102.27 to run over five years whereas the NEC 322UHD costs £182.68 to run (79% more). Read more
Higher energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the HP ENVY 34 is "C", but the rating of the NEC 322UHD is "D".
9 Reasons For
More display colour count Edit
NEC 322UHD is 1,073.7M display colours, but the HP ENVY 34 is only a unknownM display colours PC monitor (1,073.7M less).
17% faster response time Edit
The NEC 322UHD has a response time of 12ms, however the HP ENVY 34 is a 14ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

101% larger color gamut Edit
The NEC 322UHD has a color gamut of 101%, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is only a unknown% color gamut PC monitor (101% smaller).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the HP ENVY 34 only has one DisplayPort.
Two more HDMI ports Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a four HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the HP ENVY 34 only has two HDMI ports.
Higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a 4W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 4W higher than the HP ENVY 34 (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Vastly higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The NEC 322UHD has a maximum height adjustment of 150mm, however the HP ENVY 34 is only a unknownmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (150mm lower).
58% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a 95W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 55W lower than the HP ENVY 34 (95W).
28% narrower Edit
NEC 322UHD is 745mm wide. That's 205.8mm narrower than the HP ENVY 34 (745mm).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 14ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms slower than the NEC 322UHD (12ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the HP ENVY 34 is one, but the NEC 322UHD only has two DisplayPorts.
Only two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP ENVY 34 is two, but the NEC 322UHD only has four HDMI ports.
A lot higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a maximum power consumption of 150W, but the NEC 322UHD is a 95W maximum power consumption PC monitor (55W lower).
22% wider Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a width of 950.8mm, however the NEC 322UHD is a 745mm wide PC monitor (205.8mm narrower).
13 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a 31.5" PC monitor. That's 2.5" smaller than the HP ENVY 34 (31.5"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slightly narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The NEC 322UHD has a vertical viewing angle of 176°, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (2° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a 176° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 2° narrower than the HP ENVY 34 (176°).
8% smaller display diagonal Edit
The NEC 322UHD is an 80.01cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 6.35cm smaller than the HP ENVY 34 (80.01cm).
35% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a 139kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 48kWh higher than the HP ENVY 34 (139kWh).
12.5kg heavier Edit
The NEC 322UHD has a weight of 20.5kg, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is an 8kg weight PC monitor (12.5kg lighter).
Taller Edit
NEC 322UHD is 469mm tall. That's 94.9mm taller than the HP ENVY 34 (469mm).
208.1mm deeper Edit
The NEC 322UHD is a 302mm deep PC monitor, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is a 93.9mm deep PC monitor (208.1mm shallower).
More expensive by £2,342
The NEC 322UHD is £2,342.03 more expensive than the HP ENVY 34.
Fewer sellers
The NEC 322UHD is only stocked by 3 stores, but the HP ENVY 34 is stocked by 15 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by one month
The NEC 322UHD is one month older than the HP ENVY 34.
£80.41 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the NEC 322UHD costs £182.68 to run which is £80.41 more to run than the HP ENVY 34. Show assumptions.
Worse energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the NEC 322UHD is "D", whereas the rating of the HP ENVY 34 is "C".

Awards

1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

24 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 99.35
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.92
Total running cost £ 102.27
Purchase price £ 699.97
Total cost of ownership £ 802.24
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 152.23
Electricity cost - standby £ 30.45
Total running cost £ 182.68
Purchase price £ 3,042.00
Total cost of ownership £ 3,224.68
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.51T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.51 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.91T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.91 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
23
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
34"
BEST
31.5"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Graphics Resolution
 3440 x 1440
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 3440 x 1440
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 24 - 120
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 134
Pixel Pitch
0.232 x 0.232 0.18 x 0.18
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,073.7M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
176°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
176°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
Display Diagonal
86.36cm
BEST
80.01cm
Display Technology
 VA
 VA
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
14ms 12ms
BEST
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 101%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
2 4
BEST
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
3 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture mode
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm
Adjustable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 30
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
Rotating
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Rotating
Swivel Angle Range
-180 - 180 -45 - 45
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
BEST
 C
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.43W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
62W
BEST
95W
Standby Power Consumption
0.48W
BEST
5W
Annual Energy Consumption
91kWh
BEST
139kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
150W 95W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 RoHS
BEST

Weight & Dimensions

Bezel Width At Bottom
Unknown - Click to provide data 22.5mm
Bezel Width At Top
Unknown - Click to provide data 22.5mm
Bezel Width On Side
Unknown - Click to provide data 21.9mm
Weight With Stand
9.8kg
BEST
20.5kg
Height With Stand
477.1mm 469mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
197.2mm
BEST
302mm
Width With Stand
950.8mm 745mm
BEST
Weight
8kg
BEST
20.5kg
Height
374.1mm
BEST
469mm
Depth
93.9mm
BEST
302mm
Width
950.8mm 745mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cable Included
 AC
 DisplayPort
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
Manual Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User guide on CD-ROM

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 48W

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback