Acer Predator XB271HK vs Acer XB321HK

(3)
(16)
Acer Predator XB271HK
Acer XB321HK

Top Prices

Ebuyer
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 6 left!
eBay
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
Overclockers UK
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 5 left!
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
Overclockers UK
Out of stock

Reasons For

13 Reasons For
Vastly bigger viewable height Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK is a 336mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 336mm bigger than the Acer XB321HK (unknownmm).
597mm bigger viewable width Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK has a viewable width of 597mm, whereas the Acer XB321HK is only a unknownmm viewable width PC monitor (597mm smaller).
1,070M more display colour count Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK is a 1,070M display colours PC monitor. That's 1,070M more than the Acer XB321HK (unknownM).
Vastly wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 178° wider than the Acer XB321HK (unknown°).
Vastly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, however the Acer XB321HK is only a unknown° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (178° narrower).
Vastly bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK has a display diagonal of 68.6cm, however the Acer XB321HK is only a unknowncm display diagonal PC monitor (68.6cm smaller).
2W higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK has an RMS rated audio power of 2W, whereas the Acer XB321HK is only a unknownW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 30.2mm higher than the Acer XB321HK (119.8mm).
Lower power consumption when off Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK has a power consumption when off of 0.39W, but the Acer XB321HK is a 0.47W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.08W higher).
15% lighter Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK is a 7kg weight PC monitor. That's 1kg lighter than the Acer XB321HK (8kg).
33.3mm shorter Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK is a 401mm tall PC monitor, whereas the Acer XB321HK is a 434.3mm tall PC monitor (33.3mm taller).
125.14mm narrower Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK is a 614mm wide PC monitor, whereas the Acer XB321HK is a 739.14mm wide PC monitor (125.14mm wider).
£140 cheaper
The Acer Predator XB271HK costs £140.01 less than the Acer XB321HK.
6 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Acer XB321HK is a 32" PC monitor. That's 5" bigger than the Acer Predator XB271HK (32"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Four times shallower Edit
Acer XB321HK is 61mm deep, but the Acer Predator XB271HK is a 268mm deep PC monitor (207mm deeper).
3 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
£24.42 cheaper to run
Over five years the Acer XB321HK only costs £92.71 to run whereas the Acer Predator XB271HK costs £117.13 to run (26% more). Read more
Better selling
The Acer XB321HK ranks No. 5678 by number of sales, but the Acer Predator XB271HK ranks No. 12261.
Hugely better user reviews
Based on 15 reviews, the average user review score of the Acer XB321HK is 93%, but the average rating of the Acer Predator XB271HK is 70% (based on 2 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
19% smaller screen size Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK has a screen size of 27", however the Acer XB321HK is a 32" PC monitor (5" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

78% deeper Edit
The Acer Predator XB271HK has a depth of 268mm. That's 207mm deeper than the Acer XB321HK (61mm).
Less retailers
Only 15 sellers sells the Acer Predator XB271HK, whereas 18 retailers sell the Acer XB321HK. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Five months older
The Acer Predator XB271HK is older than the Acer XB321HK by five months.
More expensive to run over five years by 26%
Over five years the running costs of the Acer Predator XB271HK are £117.13 which is £24.42 more than the Acer XB321HK. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Acer Predator XB271HK ranks No. 12261 by sales volume, however the Acer XB321HK ranks No. 5678.
Vastly Lower user review Score
The Acer Predator XB271HK's average user rating is only 70%, however the Acer XB321HK's is 93% (based on 15 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
30.2mm lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer XB321HK has a maximum height adjustment of 119.8mm, whereas the Acer Predator XB271HK is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (30.2mm higher).
0.08W higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer XB321HK is a 0.47W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.08W higher than the Acer Predator XB271HK (0.47W).
Heavier Edit
The Acer XB321HK has a weight of 8kg, but the Acer Predator XB271HK is a 7kg weight PC monitor (1kg lighter).
Taller Edit
The Acer XB321HK has a height of 434.3mm. That's 33.3mm taller than the Acer Predator XB271HK (434.3mm).
17% wider Edit
The Acer XB321HK has a width of 739.14mm. That's 125.14mm wider than the Acer Predator XB271HK (739.14mm).
More expensive by £140
The Acer XB321HK is £140.01 more expensive than the Acer Predator XB271HK.

Awards

1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

17 months Ago 11 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 114.57
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 117.13
Purchase price £ 639.98
Total cost of ownership £ 757.11
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 89.73
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.98
Total running cost £ 92.71
Purchase price £ 779.99
Total cost of ownership £ 872.70
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.58T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.58 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.46T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.46 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 32"
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
Viewable Height
336mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.233 x 0.233 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
1,070M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 4ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 1
USB 3.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC Power in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC power in port

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
RMS Rated Audio Power
2W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
 NVIDIA G-SYNC

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
119.8mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
-30 - 30 Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Consumption When Off
0.39W
BEST
0.47W
Typical Power Consumption
71.5W 56W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.42W
BEST
0.49W
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 11.3kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 581.9mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 309.9mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 737.8mm
Weight
7kg
BEST
8kg
Height
401mm
BEST
434.3mm
Depth
268mm 61mm
BEST
Width
614mm
BEST
739.14mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
Feedback