AOC Q3277PQU vs Philips BDM3270QP

(8)
(9)
AOC Q3277PQU
Philips BDM3270QP

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 2 left!
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Debenhams Plus
FREE Standard delivery
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (18 available)
Misco
Standard delivery: £14.39
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Marginally wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The AOC Q3277PQU has a vertical viewing angle of 178°, whereas the Philips BDM3270QP is only a 170° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The AOC Q3277PQU is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Philips BDM3270QP (170°).
Two times faster response time Edit
The AOC Q3277PQU has a response time of 4ms, however the Philips BDM3270QP is a 12ms response time PC monitor (8ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper by £59
The AOC Q3277PQU is £59.25 cheaper than the Philips BDM3270QP.
4 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Better selling
The AOC Q3277PQU ranks No. 18738 by number of sales, whereas the Philips BDM3270QP ranks No. 26145.
4 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP is an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm bigger than the AOC Q3277PQU (81.3cm).
Cheaper to run by £8.65
Over five years the Philips BDM3270QP is £8.65 cheaper to run than the AOC Q3277PQU. Read more
Four more awards
The Philips BDM3270QP has 5 awards from expert review sites, but the AOC Q3277PQU has 1 award.
A bit better user reviews
The average user review score of the Philips BDM3270QP is 100% based on 2 reviews, whereas the average rating of the AOC Q3277PQU is 97% (based on 7 reviews).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The AOC Q3277PQU is an 81.28cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm smaller than the Philips BDM3270QP (81.3cm).
£8.65 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the AOC Q3277PQU are £99.18 which is £8.65 more than the Philips BDM3270QP over five years. Show assumptions.
Four less awards
The AOC Q3277PQU has only received 1 award, but the Philips BDM3270QP has received 5 awards.
User review Rating is marginally Worse
The average user rating of the AOC Q3277PQU is 97%, whereas the average user rating of the Philips BDM3270QP is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
8° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP has a vertical viewing angle of 170°, whereas the AOC Q3277PQU is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the AOC Q3277PQU (170°).
Vastly slower response time Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP has a response time of 12ms, however the AOC Q3277PQU is a 4ms response time PC monitor (8ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

More expensive by £59
The Philips BDM3270QP is £59.25 more expensive than the AOC Q3277PQU.
Fewer sellers
The Philips BDM3270QP is only stocked by 16 stores, but the AOC Q3277PQU is stocked by 20 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by five months
The Philips BDM3270QP is five months older than the AOC Q3277PQU.
Less popular
The Philips BDM3270QP is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 26145 by number of sales in our PC monitors, whereas the AOC Q3277PQU ranks No. 18738.

Awards

1 Award
Les Numeriques.com: 5 Star
5 Awards
3dnews.ru: Recommended
benchmark.pl: Good Product
Digital Versus: 5 Star
hardware.info: Excellent
SweClockers.com: Good Product

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

19 months Ago 23 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 96.14
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 99.18
Purchase price £ 324.99
Total cost of ownership £ 424.17
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 87.49
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 90.53
Purchase price £ 384.24
Total cost of ownership £ 474.77
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.49T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.49 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.45T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.45 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
32" 32"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1440
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link
SRGB Display Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 SRGB display feature
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 398.52mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 708.48mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 23 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 15 - 99
Pixel Pitch
0.276 x 0.276 0.277 x 0.277
Display Colour Count
1,070M 1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
Display Diagonal
81.28cm 81.3cm
BEST
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
12ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data 4ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC audio in
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 65%
Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Mac Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating system
Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data 70,000h

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture mode
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
180mm 180mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 24 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling base
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -170 - 170
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
BEST
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
60W 54.6W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 82kWh
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 56W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 15kg
Packaging Height
858mm 526mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
248mm 224mm
BEST
Packaging Width
577mm
BEST
970mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 10.8kg
Height With Stand
659mm 657mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
171.2mm
BEST
270mm
Width With Stand
741.88mm
BEST
742mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.8kg
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 438mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 61mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 742mm

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 31W
Power Consumption When Active
Unknown - Click to provide data 54.6W
Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 970 x 526 x 224

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Feedback