DELL E2416H vs DELL SE2416H vs HP EliteDisplay E232e vs HP Pavilion 23xw

(4)
DELL E2416H
DELL SE2416H
HP EliteDisplay E232e
HP Pavilion 23xw

Top Prices

BT Business Direct
Standard delivery: £7.40
In stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
CompAdvance
Out of stock
eBay
Standard delivery: £18.09
BT Shop
Standard delivery: £3.49
In stock
BT Business Direct
Standard delivery: £7.04
In stock
365Games
Delivery unknown
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
eBay
Techdna
Delivery unknown
eBay
Standard delivery: £31.46
Techno Cart
Out of stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor. That's 0.2" bigger than the DELL SE2416H (23") and 1" bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (23"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2ms faster response time Edit
The DELL E2416H has a response time of 5ms, whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both 7ms response time PC monitors (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lighter Edit
The DELL E2416H has a weight of 2.9kg, but the DELL SE2416H is a 3.2kg weight PC monitor (290g heavier), the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor (720g heavier) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor (340g heavier).
Better selling
The DELL E2416H ranks No. 59433 by number of sales, but the DELL SE2416H ranks No. 189098.
10 Reasons For
4% bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 296.46mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 10.04mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (286.42mm).
Moderately bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a viewable width of 527.04mm, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both only 509.18mm viewable width PC monitors (17.86mm smaller).
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
A little wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a horizontal viewing angle of 178° (as do the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw), however the DELL E2416H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
2.1cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a display diagonal of 60.5cm, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both only 58.4cm display diagonal PC monitors (2.1cm smaller).
Moderately brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw), however the DELL E2416H is only a 240 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (10 cd/m² dimmer).
15% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL SE2416H is an 84% color gamut PC monitor. That's 12% larger than the HP Pavilion 23xw (72%).
10W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a maximum power consumption of 25W, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 35W maximum power consumption PC monitor (10W higher) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor (2W higher).
£64 cheaper
The DELL SE2416H costs £63.95 less than the DELL E2416H, costs £135.45 less than the HP EliteDisplay E232e and costs £107.35 less than the HP Pavilion 23xw.
Available from 21 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
6 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL SE2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a horizontal viewing angle of 178° (as do the DELL SE2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw), whereas the DELL E2416H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
10 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the DELL SE2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw), whereas the DELL E2416H is only a 240 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (10 cd/m² dimmer).
Adjustable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has an adjustable height, however the DELL E2416H does not have an adjustable height.
15% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has an annual energy consumption of 28kWh, however the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 32kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh higher).
Cheaper to run by £9.61
The HP EliteDisplay E232e only costs £33.49 to run over five years however the DELL E2416H costs £37.08 to run (11% more), the DELL SE2416H costs £33.88 to run (1% more) and the HP Pavilion 23xw costs £43.10 to run (29% more). Read more
6 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL SE2416H and the HP EliteDisplay E232e. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a horizontal viewing angle of 178° (as do the DELL SE2416H and the HP EliteDisplay E232e), whereas the DELL E2416H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
10 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the DELL SE2416H and the HP EliteDisplay E232e), whereas the DELL E2416H is only a 240 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (10 cd/m² dimmer).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232e only has one HDMI port. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

0.08W lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a power consumption when off of 0.22W, however the DELL SE2416H is a 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.08W higher).
User reviews are better
The HP Pavilion 23xw has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the DELL E2416H has an average rating of 95% (based on 4 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL E2416H has a vertical viewing angle of 160°, but the DELL SE2416H, the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are all 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL E2416H is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the DELL SE2416H, the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (178°).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL E2416H is a 240 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 10 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL SE2416H, the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (250 cd/m²).
Does not have an adjustable height Edit
The DELL E2416H does not have an adjustable height, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e has an adjustable height.
More expensive by £64
The DELL E2416H is £63.95 more expensive than the DELL SE2416H.
Not as many stockists
The DELL E2416H is only stocked by 12 shops, however the DELL SE2416H is stocked by 23 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by two months
The DELL E2416H is two months older than the DELL SE2416H and one month older than the HP EliteDisplay E232e.
£3.59 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the DELL E2416H costs £37.08 to run which is £3.20 more to run than the DELL SE2416H and £3.59 more to run than the HP EliteDisplay E232e. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL E2416H has an average user score of 95%, but the HP Pavilion 23xw has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
7 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller screen size Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a screen size of 23.8", however the DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor (0.2" bigger) and the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both 23" PC monitors (0.8" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slower response time Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the DELL E2416H (7ms) and 1ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The DELL SE2416H has one HDMI port, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E232e, however the HP Pavilion 23xw only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

A lot higher power consumption when off Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a power consumption when off of 0.3W, but the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 0.22W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.08W lower).
Heavier Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 3.2kg weight PC monitor. That's 290g heavier than the DELL E2416H (3.3kg), 430g lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E232e (3.3kg) and 50g lighter than the HP Pavilion 23xw (3.3kg).
1% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the DELL SE2416H costs £33.88 to run which is £0.39 more to run than the HP EliteDisplay E232e. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The DELL SE2416H ranks No. 189098 by sales volume, however the DELL E2416H ranks No. 59433.
11 Reasons Against
1" smaller screen size Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a screen size of 23" (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), whereas the DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor (1" bigger) and the DELL SE2416H is a 23.8" PC monitor (0.8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 10.04mm smaller than the DELL SE2416H (286.42mm).
17.86mm smaller viewable width Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a viewable width of 509.18mm (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), but the DELL SE2416H is a 527.04mm viewable width PC monitor (17.86mm bigger).
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a display diagonal of 58.4cm (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.1cm bigger).
29% slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 7ms response time PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 2ms slower than the DELL E2416H (7ms) and 1ms slower than the DELL SE2416H (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the DELL SE2416H, whereas the HP Pavilion 23xw only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

A lot higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a maximum power consumption of 35W, whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 25W maximum power consumption PC monitor (10W lower) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor (8W lower).
720g heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 720g heavier than the DELL E2416H (3.3kg), 430g heavier than the DELL SE2416H (3.3kg) and 380g heavier than the HP Pavilion 23xw (3.3kg).
£135 more expensive
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is more expensive than the DELL E2416H by £71.50, more expensive than the DELL SE2416H by £135.45 and more expensive than the HP Pavilion 23xw by £28.10.
Fewer sellers
Only 12 retailers sells the HP EliteDisplay E232e, but 23 sellers sell the DELL SE2416H. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
One month older
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is older than the DELL SE2416H by one month.
13 Reasons Against
1" smaller screen size Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a screen size of 23" (as does the HP EliteDisplay E232e), whereas the DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor (1" bigger) and the DELL SE2416H is a 23.8" PC monitor (0.8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E232e. That's 10.04mm smaller than the DELL SE2416H (286.42mm).
17.86mm smaller viewable width Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a viewable width of 509.18mm (as does the HP EliteDisplay E232e), but the DELL SE2416H is a 527.04mm viewable width PC monitor (17.86mm bigger).
A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a display diagonal of 58.4cm (as does the HP EliteDisplay E232e), whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.1cm bigger).
29% slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E232e. That's 2ms slower than the DELL E2416H (7ms) and 1ms slower than the DELL SE2416H (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

12% smaller color gamut Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 72% color gamut PC monitor. That's 12% smaller than the DELL SE2416H (72%).
13% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has an annual energy consumption of 32kWh, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 28kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh lower).
Marginally higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a maximum power consumption of 27W, whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 25W maximum power consumption PC monitor (2W lower) and the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 35W maximum power consumption PC monitor (8W higher).
340g heavier Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 340g heavier than the DELL E2416H (3.3kg), 50g heavier than the DELL SE2416H (3.3kg) and 380g lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E232e (3.3kg).
£107 more expensive
The HP Pavilion 23xw is more expensive than the DELL E2416H by £43.40 and more expensive than the DELL SE2416H by £107.35.
Fewer sellers
Only 2 sellers sells the HP Pavilion 23xw, but 12 sellers sell the DELL E2416H, 23 retailers sell the DELL SE2416H and 12 sellers sell the HP EliteDisplay E232e. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Six months older
The HP Pavilion 23xw is older than the DELL E2416H by four months, older than the DELL SE2416H by six months and older than the HP EliteDisplay E232e by five months.
More expensive to run over five years by 29%
Over five years the running costs of the HP Pavilion 23xw are £43.10 which is £6.02 more than the DELL E2416H, £9.22 more than the DELL SE2416H and £9.61 more than the HP EliteDisplay E232e. Show assumptions.

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

13 months Ago 11 months Ago 13 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 35.25
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 37.08
Purchase price £ 113.94
Total cost of ownership £ 151.02
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 32.05
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 33.88
Purchase price £ 49.99
Total cost of ownership £ 83.87
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 30.45
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 33.49
Purchase price £ 185.44
Total cost of ownership £ 218.93
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 40.06
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 43.10
Purchase price £ 157.34
Total cost of ownership £ 200.44
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.18T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.18 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24"
BEST
23.8" 23" 23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
 HDCP
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 296.46mm
BEST
286.42mm 286.42mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 527.04mm
BEST
509.18mm 509.18mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.27675 x 0.27675 0.2745 x 0.2745 0.265 x 0.265 0.265 x 0.265
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 60.5cm 58.4cm 58.4cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
240 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms 7ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 84% Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 96

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 2
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Adjustable height
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 22 -5 - 25 -2 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling base
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivoting base
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
16.3W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.22W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
22W 20W 19W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 28kWh
BEST
32kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 25W
BEST
35W 27W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 95 20 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 20 - 80 20 - 70
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.2kg
BEST
6.2kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data 4kg
BEST
Height With Stand
427.58mm 423.1mm 512.4mm 403.2mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
180mm 179.9mm 189mm 150.8mm
BEST
Width With Stand
566.96mm 556.6mm 549.3mm 531.8mm
BEST
Weight
2.9kg
BEST
3.2kg 3.6kg 3.3kg
Height
334.58mm 330.1mm 336.9mm 322.2mm
Depth
50.5mm 55mm 49.6mm 50.6mm
Width
566.96mm 556.6mm 549.3mm 531.8mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cable Included
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
BEST
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
BEST
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
BEST
Manual Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included
Stand Included
 Stand included
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
User Guide On CD-ROM
 User guide on CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback