DELL U2515H vs DELL U2713H vs DELL UltraSharp 25

(207)
(283)
(207)
DELL U2515H
DELL U2713H
DELL UltraSharp 25

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (32 available)
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
Novatech
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Overclockers UK
Out of stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £9.25
In stock
nrg_it
Delivery unknown
In stock
CompAdvance
Out of stock
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
Debenhams Plus
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (29 available)
Overclockers UK
Out of stock

Reasons For

14 Reasons For
One more DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the DELL U2515H is two (as does the DELL U2713H), but the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has one DisplayPort.
Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2515H is two, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 25, but the DELL U2713H only has one HDMI port.
Six USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U2515H has six USB Type-A downstream ports, however the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports.
43W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2515H has a maximum power consumption of 87W (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), but the DELL U2713H is a 130W maximum power consumption PC monitor (43W higher).
Lighter Edit
The DELL U2515H is a 4.4kg weight PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 25. That's 1.9kg lighter than the DELL U2713H (4.4kg).
12% shorter Edit
The DELL U2515H has a height of 338.7mm (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), however the DELL U2713H is a 378.2mm tall PC monitor (39.5mm taller).
Hugely shallower Edit
DELL U2515H is 46.4mm deep, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 25. That's 154.1mm shallower than the DELL U2713H (46.4mm).
13% narrower Edit
The DELL U2515H has a width of 569mm (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), however the DELL U2713H is a 639.3mm wide PC monitor (70.3mm wider).
£24 cheaper
The DELL U2515H costs £250.42, whereas the DELL U2713H is £349.00 and the DELL UltraSharp 25 is £274.00.
Available from 19 shops
The more retailers stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
£40.06 cheaper to run
The DELL U2515H is £40.06 cheaper to run than the DELL U2713H over five years. Read more
More popular
The DELL U2515H is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 1364 by sales volume in our PC monitors, but the DELL U2713H ranks No. 54512 and the DELL UltraSharp 25 ranks No. 4638.
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 4 reviews, the DELL U2515H has an average expert review score of 100%, but the DELL U2713H has an average rating of 82% (based on 36 reviews).
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 203 reviews, the DELL U2515H has an average user review score of 94%, but the DELL U2713H has an average rating of 80% (based on 247 reviews).
7 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 27" PC monitor. That's 2" bigger than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (25"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slightly bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U2713H has a viewable height of 335.7mm, however the DELL U2515H is only a 311.04mm viewable height PC monitor (24.66mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 596.7mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 43.74mm bigger than the DELL U2515H ().
8% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 68.47cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 5.03cm bigger than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (63.44cm).
2ms faster response time Edit
The DELL U2713H has a response time of 6ms, but the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both 8ms response time PC monitors (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two DisplayPorts Edit
The DELL U2713H has two DisplayPorts, and so does the DELL U2515H, however the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has one DisplayPort.
Thirteen more awards
The DELL U2713H has 15 awards from expert review sites, whereas the DELL U2515H has 2 awards and the DELL UltraSharp 25 has 2 awards.
9 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the DELL U2515H), whereas the DELL U2713H only has one HDMI port.
Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is an 87W maximum power consumption PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2515H. That's 43W lower than the DELL U2713H (87W).
A lot lighter Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a weight of 4.4kg (as does the DELL U2515H), whereas the DELL U2713H is a 6.3kg weight PC monitor (1.9kg heavier).
Shorter Edit
DELL UltraSharp 25 is 338.7mm tall, and so does the DELL U2515H. That's 39.5mm shorter than the DELL U2713H (338.7mm).
Four times shallower Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 46.4mm deep PC monitor (as does the DELL U2515H), whereas the DELL U2713H is a 200.5mm deep PC monitor (154.1mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
DELL UltraSharp 25 is 569mm wide, and so does the DELL U2515H. That's 70.3mm narrower than the DELL U2713H (569mm).
Cheaper to run by £40.06
Over five years the DELL UltraSharp 25 is £40.06 cheaper to run than the DELL U2713H. Read more
Considerably better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the DELL UltraSharp 25 is 100% based on 4 reviews, whereas the average rating of the DELL U2713H is 82% (based on 36 reviews).
Considerably better user reviews
The average user review score of the DELL UltraSharp 25 is 94% based on 203 reviews, whereas the average rating of the DELL U2713H is 80% (based on 247 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Moderately smaller screen size Edit
The DELL U2515H has a screen size of 25" (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), but the DELL U2713H is a 27" PC monitor (2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

8% smaller viewable height Edit
The DELL U2515H is a 311.04mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 24.66mm smaller than the DELL U2713H ().
A little smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL U2515H has a viewable width of 552.96mm, however the DELL U2713H is a 596.7mm viewable width PC monitor (43.74mm bigger).
5.03cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2515H has a display diagonal of 63.44cm (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), but the DELL U2713H is a 68.47cm display diagonal PC monitor (5.03cm bigger).
2ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2515H is an 8ms response time PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 25. That's 2ms slower than the DELL U2713H (8ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One month older
The DELL U2515H is older than the DELL UltraSharp 25 by one month.
Fewer awards
Whilst the DELL U2515H has received 2 awards, the DELL U2713H has received 15 awards.
14 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL U2713H has one HDMI port, however the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has two HDMI ports.
One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL U2713H is a five USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), whereas the DELL U2515H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports.
34% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 130W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 43W higher than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (87W).
1.9kg heavier Edit
The DELL U2713H has a weight of 6.3kg, however the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both 4.4kg weight PC monitors (1.9kg lighter).
39.5mm taller Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 378.2mm tall PC monitor. That's 39.5mm taller than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (338.7mm).
154.1mm deeper Edit
The DELL U2713H has a depth of 200.5mm, however the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both 46.4mm deep PC monitors (154.1mm shallower).
70.3mm wider Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 639.3mm wide PC monitor. That's 70.3mm wider than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (569mm).
More expensive by £99
The DELL U2713H is £98.58 more expensive than the DELL U2515H and £75 more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 25.
Less retailers
The DELL U2713H is only stocked by 14 shops, whereas the DELL U2515H is stocked by 32 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over two years
The DELL U2713H is two years older than the DELL U2515H and two years older than the DELL UltraSharp 25.
£40.06 more expensive to run over five years
The DELL U2713H costs £99.18 to run which is £40.06 more to run than the DELL U2515H and £40.06 more to run than the DELL UltraSharp 25 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The DELL U2713H is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 54512 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the DELL U2515H ranks No. 1364 and the DELL UltraSharp 25 ranks No. 4638.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The DELL U2713H's average expert score is 82%, however the DELL U2515H's is 100% (based on 4 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 25's is 100% (based on 4 reviews).
User review Rating is much Worse
The DELL U2713H's average user score is 80%, however the DELL U2515H's is 94% (based on 203 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 25's is 94% (based on 203 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
8% smaller screen size Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 25" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2515H. That's 2" smaller than the DELL U2713H (25"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 63.44cm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2515H. That's 5.03cm smaller than the DELL U2713H (63.44cm).
25% slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a response time of 8ms (as does the DELL U2515H), however the DELL U2713H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one DisplayPort Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2713H only has two DisplayPorts.
One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL UltraSharp 25 is five (as does the DELL U2713H), but the DELL U2515H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports.
More expensive by £24
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is £23.58 more expensive than the DELL U2515H.
Fewer sellers
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is only stocked by 13 stores, but the DELL U2515H is stocked by 32 shops and the DELL U2713H is stocked by 14 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Less popular
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 4638 by number of sales in our PC monitors, whereas the DELL U2515H ranks No. 1364.
Thirteen less awards
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has only received 2 awards, but the DELL U2713H has received 15 awards.

Awards

2 Awards
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
SweClockers.com: Good Product
15 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
Expert Reviews: Ultimate
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good
hwt.dk: Gold Product of the Year
itproportal.com: Best Buy
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
prad.de: Very Good
SweClockers.com: Good Product
ua.gecid.com: Gamer's Choice
vido.com.ua: Recommended
2 Awards
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
SweClockers.com: Good Product

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

24 months Ago 48 months Ago 23 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 56.08
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 59.12
Purchase price £ 250.42
Total cost of ownership £ 309.54
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 96.14
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 99.18
Purchase price £ 349.00
Total cost of ownership £ 448.18
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 56.08
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 59.12
Purchase price £ 274.00
Total cost of ownership £ 333.12
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.49T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.49 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
25" 27"
BEST
25"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1440p
BEST
 1440p
 1440p
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Viewable Height
311.04mm 335.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
552.96mm 596.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.216 x 0.216 0.231 x 0.231 0.216 x 0.216
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
63.44cm 68.47cm
BEST
63.44cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 6ms
BEST
8ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Output Port
 Audio output port
 Audio output port
 Audio output port
DisplayPort
2
BEST
2
BEST
1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
6
BEST
5 5
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC Power in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC power in port
 AC power in port

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Linux Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Linux operating system
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -21 - 5
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
 Pivoting base
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display
Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Typical Power Consumption
35W
BEST
60W 35W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
87W
BEST
130W 87W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
9.8kg
BEST
11kg 9.8kg
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6.8kg
Height With Stand
398mm
BEST
538.4mm 512.5mm
Depth With Stand
205mm Unknown - Click to provide data 205mm
Width With Stand
569mm Unknown - Click to provide data 569mm
Weight
4.4kg
BEST
6.3kg 4.4kg
BEST
Height
338.7mm
BEST
378.2mm 338.7mm
BEST
Depth
46.4mm
BEST
200.5mm 46.4mm
BEST
Width
569mm
BEST
639.3mm 569mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 DVI
Manual Included
 Manual included
 Manual included
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included

Technical Details

Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 311.04 x 552.96
Feedback