Benq RL2755 vs LG 34UM95C

(123)
(26)
Benq RL2755
LG 34UM95C

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Novatech
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £3.99
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
4ms faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms faster than the LG 34UM95C (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

0.7W lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 0.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 0.7W lower than the LG 34UM95C (1.2W).
22% lighter Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg lighter than the LG 34UM95C (6.7kg).
A lot narrower Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 639mm wide PC monitor, whereas the LG 34UM95C is an 829.9mm wide PC monitor (190.9mm wider).
70% cheaper to run
The Benq RL2755 only costs £38.79 to run over five years but the LG 34UM95C costs £128.19 to run (230% more). Read more
User reviews are a lot better
The Benq RL2755 has an average user review score of 94%, however the LG 34UM95C has an average rating of 84% (based on 26 reviews).
8 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The LG 34UM95C has a screen size of 34", but the Benq RL2755 is only a 27" PC monitor (7" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The LG 34UM95C is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (178°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The LG 34UM95C has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, but the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
20 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 34UM95C has a display brightness of 320 cd/m², but the Benq RL2755 is only a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² dimmer).
Larger color gamut Edit
The LG 34UM95C is a 99% color gamut PC monitor. That's 27% larger than the Benq RL2755 (99%).
Vastly higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The LG 34UM95C has an RMS rated audio power of 14W, however the Benq RL2755 is only a 4W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (10W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

98.2mm shorter Edit
The LG 34UM95C has a height of 379.8mm, however the Benq RL2755 is a 478mm tall PC monitor (98.2mm taller).
Hugely shallower Edit
LG 34UM95C is 82.9mm deep. That's 130.1mm shallower than the Benq RL2755 (82.9mm).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
7" smaller screen size Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a screen size of 27", however the LG 34UM95C is a 34" PC monitor (7" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the LG 34UM95C (178°).
8° narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°, however the LG 34UM95C is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
20 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², however the LG 34UM95C is a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter).
Smaller color gamut Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 72% color gamut PC monitor. That's 27% smaller than the LG 34UM95C (99%).
Significantly lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Benq RL2755 has an RMS rated audio power of 4W, whereas the LG 34UM95C is a 14W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (10W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

98.2mm taller Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 478mm tall PC monitor, whereas the LG 34UM95C is a 379.8mm tall PC monitor (98.2mm shorter).
62% deeper Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a depth of 213mm. That's 130.1mm deeper than the LG 34UM95C (82.9mm).
Four months older
The Benq RL2755 is older than the LG 34UM95C by four months.
7 Reasons Against
80% slower response time Edit
The LG 34UM95C is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

59% higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The LG 34UM95C is a 1.2W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 0.7W higher than the Benq RL2755 (1.2W).
Heavier Edit
The LG 34UM95C is a 6.7kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg heavier than the Benq RL2755 (6.7kg).
24% wider Edit
The LG 34UM95C has a width of 829.9mm, however the Benq RL2755 is a 639mm wide PC monitor (190.9mm narrower).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
More expensive to run over five years by 230%
The LG 34UM95C costs £128.19 to run which is £89.40 more to run than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
A lot Lower user review Score
The LG 34UM95C has an average user rating of 84%, but the Benq RL2755 has an average user rating of 94% (based on 107 reviews).

Awards

2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

24 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 38.79
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 38.79
Purchase price £ 199.98
Total cost of ownership £ 238.77
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 128.19
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 128.19

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.64T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.64 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
16
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 34"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3440 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3440 x 1440
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
SRGB Display Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 SRGB display feature
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
336.15mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.2325 x 0.2325
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 87cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 320 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
72% 99%
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
 Headphone out port
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Input Port
 Audio input port
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
HDMI Port
2 2
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
AC Power in Port
 AC power in port
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
4W 14W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicator
 LED indicator
 LED indicator

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W
BEST
1.2W
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Typical Power Consumption
24.21W
BEST
80W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 77kWh
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
BEST
 90 - 264
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 10.1kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 513mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 177mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 904mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.7kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 468.9mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 172.9mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 829.9mm
Weight
5.5kg
BEST
6.7kg
Height
478mm 379.8mm
BEST
Depth
213mm 82.9mm
BEST
Width
639mm
BEST
829.9mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Manual Included
 Manual included
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback