AOC I2757F vs DELL S2715H vs HP 27xw

(562)
(20)
(13)
AOC I2757F
DELL S2715H
HP 27xw

Top Prices

Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Laptop Outlet
Out of stock
Box
Out of stock
No prices found
eBay
Standard delivery: £31.69
Argos
Standard delivery: £3.95
In stock
Currys
FREE Standard delivery
feeff
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 0.019999999999996cm bigger than the HP 27xw (68.58cm).
Faster response time Edit
The AOC I2757F has a response time of 5ms, but the DELL S2715H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the HP 27xw is a 14ms response time PC monitor (9ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A little better user reviews
Based on 524 user reviews, the average review score of the AOC I2757F is 92%, however the average rating of the DELL S2715H is 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the average rating of the HP 27xw is 89% (based on 13 reviews).
8 Reasons For
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the AOC I2757F. That's 0.019999999999996cm bigger than the HP 27xw (68.58cm).
One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL S2715H is a two USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the AOC I2757F only has one USB Type-A downstream port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP 27xw. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Cable lock slot Edit
The DELL S2715H has a cable lock slot (as does the HP 27xw), but the AOC I2757F does not have a cable lock slot.
VESA mounting Edit
The DELL S2715H supports VESA mounting, whereas the AOC I2757F does not support VESA mounting.
Shorter Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 361.5mm tall PC monitor. That's 87.5mm shorter than the AOC I2757F (454.6mm) and 93.1mm shorter than the HP 27xw (454.6mm).
117.9mm shallower Edit
The DELL S2715H has a depth of 46.1mm, however the AOC I2757F is a 130mm deep PC monitor (83.9mm deeper) and the HP 27xw is a 164mm deep PC monitor (117.9mm deeper).
2% narrower Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 611.2mm wide PC monitor. That's 10.8mm narrower than the AOC I2757F (622.6mm) and 11.4mm narrower than the HP 27xw (622.6mm).
33% cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL S2715H only costs £35.09 to run but the HP 27xw costs £52.71 to run (50% more). Read more
8 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The HP 27xw has an HDCP, whereas the AOC I2757F does not have an HDCP.
Two HDMI ports Edit
The HP 27xw is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Cable lock slot Edit
The HP 27xw has a cable lock slot, and so does the DELL S2715H, however the AOC I2757F does not have a cable lock slot.
Significantly lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP 27xw has a maximum power consumption of 32W, whereas the DELL S2715H is a 55W maximum power consumption PC monitor (23W higher).
33% lighter Edit
The HP 27xw is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.4kg lighter than the AOC I2757F (4.3kg) and 560g lighter than the DELL S2715H (4.3kg).
£36 cheaper
The HP 27xw is £36.37 cheaper than the AOC I2757F.
Available from 6 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
More popular
The HP 27xw is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 15562 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the AOC I2757F ranks No. 20071.

Reasons Against

13 Reasons Against
Does not have an HDCP Edit
The AOC I2757F does not have an HDCP, but the HP 27xw has an HDCP.
One less HDMI port Edit
The AOC I2757F has one HDMI port (as does the DELL S2715H), however the HP 27xw only has two HDMI ports.
One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The AOC I2757F is a one USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H only has two USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP 27xw. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Does not have a cable lock slot Edit
The AOC I2757F does not have a cable lock slot, whereas the DELL S2715H and the HP 27xw have a cable lock slot.
Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The AOC I2757F does not support VESA mounting, however the DELL S2715H supports VESA mounting.
25% heavier Edit
The AOC I2757F has a weight of 5.7kg, however the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kg weight PC monitor (840g lighter) and the HP 27xw is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor (1.4kg lighter).
87.5mm taller Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 449mm tall PC monitor. That's 87.5mm taller than the DELL S2715H (454.6mm) and 5.6mm shorter than the HP 27xw (454.6mm).
83.9mm deeper Edit
The AOC I2757F has a depth of 130mm, however the DELL S2715H is a 46.1mm deep PC monitor (83.9mm shallower) and the HP 27xw is a 164mm deep PC monitor (34mm deeper).
2% wider Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 622mm wide PC monitor. That's 10.8mm wider than the DELL S2715H (622.6mm) and 0.60000000000002mm narrower than the HP 27xw (622.6mm).
More expensive by £36
The AOC I2757F is £36.37 more expensive than the HP 27xw.
Less retailers
The AOC I2757F is only stocked by 7 retailers, whereas the HP 27xw is stocked by 13 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over two years
The AOC I2757F is two years older than the DELL S2715H and three years older than the HP 27xw.
Less popular
The AOC I2757F is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 20071 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the HP 27xw ranks No. 15562.
7 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H has a response time of 6ms, but the AOC I2757F is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster) and the HP 27xw is a 14ms response time PC monitor (8ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL S2715H has one HDMI port (as does the AOC I2757F), however the HP 27xw only has two HDMI ports.
42% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 55W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 23W higher than the HP 27xw (32W).
12% heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H has a weight of 4.9kg, however the AOC I2757F is a 5.7kg weight PC monitor (840g heavier) and the HP 27xw is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor (560g lighter).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by nine months
The DELL S2715H is nine months older than the HP 27xw.
User review Rating is slightly Worse
The DELL S2715H's average user score is 88%, however the AOC I2757F's is 92% (based on 524 reviews) and the HP 27xw's is 89% (based on 13 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
A little smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP 27xw has a display diagonal of 68.58cm, whereas the AOC I2757F and the DELL S2715H are both 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitors (0.019999999999996cm bigger).
65% slower response time Edit
The HP 27xw is a 14ms response time PC monitor. That's 9ms slower than the AOC I2757F (14ms) and 8ms slower than the DELL S2715H (14ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Taller Edit
HP 27xw is 454.6mm tall, but the AOC I2757F is a 449mm tall PC monitor (5.6mm shorter) and the DELL S2715H is a 361.5mm tall PC monitor (93.1mm shorter).
72% deeper Edit
The HP 27xw is a 164mm deep PC monitor. That's 34mm deeper than the AOC I2757F (164mm) and 117.9mm deeper than the DELL S2715H (164mm).
A bit wider Edit
HP 27xw is 622.6mm wide, but the AOC I2757F is a 622mm wide PC monitor (0.60000000000002mm narrower) and the DELL S2715H is a 611.2mm wide PC monitor (11.4mm narrower).
More expensive to run over five years by 50%
Over five years the HP 27xw costs £52.71 to run which is £17.62 more to run than the DELL S2715H. Show assumptions.
Slightly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the HP 27xw is 89%, whereas the average user rating of the AOC I2757F is 92% (based on 524 reviews).

Awards

15 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elchapuzasinformatico.com: Silver
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hispazone.com: Recommended Product
in4.pl: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
macworld.co.uk: Editor's Choice
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Patented Design
thg.ru: Smart Buy
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
Tweak.dk: Great Product
No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 25 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -
Electricity cost - switched on £ 32.05
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 35.09
Electricity cost - switched on £ 49.67
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 52.71
Purchase price £ 130.74
Total cost of ownership £ 183.45
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.26T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.26 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
 20000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Full HD
 Full HD
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
BEST
Viewable Height
336.31mm 336.31mm 336.31mm
Viewable Width
597.89mm 597.89mm 597.89mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
68.58cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms 14ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 18W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
BEST
 Cable lock slot
BEST
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
16 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Typical Power Consumption
40W 20W
BEST
31W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 39kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 55W 32W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8kg
BEST
8.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
490mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
140mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
714mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg 5.6kg
BEST
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 445mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 196mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 611.2mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
5.7kg 4.9kg 4.3kg
BEST
Height
449mm 361.5mm
BEST
454.6mm
Depth
130mm 46.1mm
BEST
164mm
Width
622mm 611.2mm
BEST
622.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
Manual Included
 Manual included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Video Dot Rate
170MHz Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback