Asus PB328 vs Philips BDM3270QP

(7)
(9)
Asus PB328
Philips BDM3270QP

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
eBay
Standard delivery: £267.33
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (18 available)
Misco
Standard delivery: £14.39
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
1% more display colour count Edit
The Asus PB328 is a 1,073.7M display colours PC monitor. That's 3.7M more than the Philips BDM3270QP (1,070M).
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus PB328 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Philips BDM3270QP (170°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus PB328 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, however the Philips BDM3270QP is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Two times faster response time Edit
The Asus PB328 is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 8ms faster than the Philips BDM3270QP (12ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

7mm shorter Edit
The Asus PB328 is a 431mm tall PC monitor, whereas the Philips BDM3270QP is a 438mm tall PC monitor (7mm taller).
A little narrower Edit
The Asus PB328 is a 734.4mm wide PC monitor, whereas the Philips BDM3270QP is a 742mm wide PC monitor (7.6mm wider).
£107 cheaper
The Asus PB328 costs £107.14 less than the Philips BDM3270QP.
Available from 3 shops
A greater number of stores increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
6 Reasons For
0.019999999999996cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP has a display diagonal of 81.3cm, but the Asus PB328 is only an 81.28cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm smaller).
Shallower Edit
Philips BDM3270QP is 61mm deep. That's 5.85mm shallower than the Asus PB328 (61mm).
£56.56 cheaper to run
The Philips BDM3270QP is £56.56 cheaper to run than the Asus PB328 over five years. Read more
More popular
The Philips BDM3270QP is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 26145 by sales volume in our PC monitors, but the Asus PB328 ranks No. 59995.
Three more awards
The Philips BDM3270QP has 5 awards, however the Asus PB328 has 2 awards.
User reviews are hugely better
Based on 2 user reviews, the Philips BDM3270QP has an average review score of 100%, but the Asus PB328 has an average rating of 75% (based on 4 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus PB328 has a display diagonal of 81.28cm, however the Philips BDM3270QP is an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm bigger).
9% deeper Edit
The Asus PB328 has a depth of 66.85mm. That's 5.85mm deeper than the Philips BDM3270QP (61mm).
More expensive to run over five years by 62%
The running costs of the Asus PB328 are £147.09 which is £56.56 more than the Philips BDM3270QP over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Asus PB328 ranks No. 59995 by sales volume, however the Philips BDM3270QP ranks No. 26145.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Asus PB328 has received 2 awards, the Philips BDM3270QP has received 5 awards.
Vastly Lower user review Score
The Asus PB328's average user rating is only 75%, however the Philips BDM3270QP's is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
Less display colour count Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP has a display colour count of 1,070M. That's 3.7M less than the Asus PB328 (1,070M).
5% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP is a 170° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Asus PB328 (170°).
A bit narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°, but the Asus PB328 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
Slower response time Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP is a 12ms response time PC monitor. That's 8ms slower than the Asus PB328 (12ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Slightly taller Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP has a height of 438mm, however the Asus PB328 is a 431mm tall PC monitor (7mm shorter).
7.6mm wider Edit
The Philips BDM3270QP has a width of 742mm, however the Asus PB328 is a 734.4mm wide PC monitor (7.6mm narrower).
£107 more expensive
The Philips BDM3270QP is more expensive than the Asus PB328 by £107.14.
Not as many stockists
Only 16 sellers sells the Philips BDM3270QP, however 19 stores sell the Asus PB328. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Two months older
The Philips BDM3270QP is older than the Asus PB328 by two months.

Awards

2 Awards
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor's Choice
tomshardware.com: Editor's Choice
5 Awards
3dnews.ru: Recommended
benchmark.pl: Good Product
Digital Versus: 5 Star
hardware.info: Excellent
SweClockers.com: Good Product

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

21 months Ago 23 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 144.05
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 147.09
Purchase price £ 277.10
Total cost of ownership £ 424.19
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 87.49
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 90.53
Purchase price £ 384.24
Total cost of ownership £ 474.77
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.73T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.73 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
19
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.45T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.45 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
32" 32"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1440
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
SRGB Display Feature
 SRGB display feature
 SRGB display feature
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
49 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
29 - 130 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 398.52mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 708.48mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
49 - 76 23 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 15 - 99
Pixel Pitch
0.277 x 0.277 0.277 x 0.277
Display Colour Count
1,073.7M
BEST
1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
81.28cm 81.3cm
BEST
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
12ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data 4ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
PC Audio in
 PC audio in
 PC audio in
Headphone Output
1 1
DisplayPort
1 1
USB 3.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC Power in Port
 AC power in port
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
6W 6W
Loudspeaker
2 2
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 65%
Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Mac Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating system
Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data 70,000h

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture mode
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 180mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
20 - -5 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -170 - 170
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
BEST
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
89.9W 54.6W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 82kWh
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 56W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
16.5kg 15kg
BEST
Packaging Height
552mm 526mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
350mm 224mm
BEST
Packaging Width
847mm
BEST
970mm
Weight With Stand
11.8kg 10.8kg
BEST
Height With Stand
625mm
BEST
657mm
Depth With Stand
242mm
BEST
270mm
Width With Stand
735mm
BEST
742mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.8kg
Height
431mm
BEST
438mm
Depth
66.85mm 61mm
BEST
Width
734.4mm
BEST
742mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 31W
Power Consumption When Active
Unknown - Click to provide data 54.6W
Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 970 x 526 x 224

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Feedback