DELL UltraSharp 24 vs Samsung S23E650D vs Samsung S24E650PL

(169)
DELL UltraSharp 24
Samsung S23E650D
Samsung S24E650PL

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (38 available)
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
ITC Sales
Delivery unknown
In stock
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Saverstore
Delivery unknown
In stock
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Ebuyer
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 4 left!
9 to 5 Supplies
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

11 Reasons For
5% bigger screen size Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1" PC monitor. That's 1.1" bigger than the Samsung S23E650D (23.6") and 0.5" bigger than the Samsung S24E650PL (23.6"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewable height of 324mm, but the Samsung S23E650D is only a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor (37.58mm smaller).
2% bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 518.4mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 9.22mm bigger than the Samsung S23E650D ().
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 61.1cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 1.16cm bigger than the Samsung S24E650PL (59.94cm).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S23E650D and the Samsung S24E650PL (250 cd/m²).
Audio output port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has an audio output port (as does the Samsung S24E650PL), whereas the Samsung S23E650D does not have an audio output port.
One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL UltraSharp 24 is two, but the Samsung S24E650PL only has one HDMI port. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the Samsung S23E650D. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

Three more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has five USB Type-A downstream ports, however the Samsung S23E650D only has two USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Samsung S24E650PL. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

11 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
£2.00 cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL UltraSharp 24 is £2.00 cheaper to run than the Samsung S24E650PL. Read more
Better selling
The DELL UltraSharp 24 ranks No. 7832 by number of sales, but the Samsung S23E650D ranks No. 91781 and the Samsung S24E650PL ranks No. 17092.
4 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S23E650D is a 4ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S24E650PL. That's 4ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Twenty-nine times lower power consumption when off Edit
The Samsung S23E650D has a power consumption when off of 0.01W, but the Samsung S24E650PL is a 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.29W higher).
16% lighter Edit
The Samsung S23E650D is a 3.7kg weight PC monitor. That's 560g lighter than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (4kg) and 280g lighter than the Samsung S24E650PL (4kg).
£9 cheaper
The Samsung S23E650D costs £18.02 less than the DELL UltraSharp 24 and costs £8.54 less than the Samsung S24E650PL.
4 Reasons For
4ms faster response time Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 4ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S23E650D. That's 4ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Audio output port Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has an audio output port, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24, whereas the Samsung S23E650D does not have an audio output port.
Audio input port Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has an audio input port, however the Samsung S23E650D does not have an audio input port.
User reviews are better
The Samsung S24E650PL has an average user review score of 100%, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 has an average rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
A lot slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a response time of 8ms, whereas the Samsung S23E650D and the Samsung S24E650PL are both 4ms response time PC monitors (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Heavier Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a weight of 4.3kg, but the Samsung S23E650D is a 3.7kg weight PC monitor (560g lighter) and the Samsung S24E650PL is a 4kg weight PC monitor (280g lighter).
More expensive by £18
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is £18.02 more expensive than the Samsung S23E650D and £9.48 more expensive than the Samsung S24E650PL.
Older by eight months
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is eight months older than the Samsung S23E650D and six months older than the Samsung S24E650PL.
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has an average user score of 91%, but the Samsung S24E650PL has an average user rating of 100% (based on 2 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S23E650D has a screen size of 23", however the DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1" PC monitor (1.1" bigger) and the Samsung S24E650PL is a 23.6" PC monitor (0.6" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

14% smaller viewable height Edit
The Samsung S23E650D is a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 37.58mm smaller than the DELL UltraSharp 24 ().
A bit smaller viewable width Edit
The Samsung S23E650D has a viewable width of 509.18mm, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 518.4mm viewable width PC monitor (9.22mm bigger).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S23E650D has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as does the Samsung S24E650PL), however the DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Does not have an audio output port Edit
The Samsung S23E650D does not have an audio output port, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the Samsung S24E650PL have an audio output port.
Does not have an audio input port Edit
The Samsung S23E650D does not have an audio input port, however the Samsung S24E650PL has an audio input port.
Only two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Samsung S23E650D is a two USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Samsung S24E650PL. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Less retailers
Only 11 stores sells the Samsung S23E650D, whereas 22 retailers sell the DELL UltraSharp 24 and 14 retailers sell the Samsung S24E650PL. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Worse selling
The Samsung S23E650D ranks No. 91781 by sales volume, however the DELL UltraSharp 24 ranks No. 7832 and the Samsung S24E650PL ranks No. 17092.
11 Reasons Against
0.5" smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a screen size of 23.6", but the DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1" PC monitor (0.5" bigger) and the Samsung S23E650D is a 23" PC monitor (0.6" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Marginally smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a display diagonal of 59.94cm, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 61.1cm display diagonal PC monitor (1.16cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as does the Samsung S23E650D), but the DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Samsung S24E650PL is one, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the Samsung S23E650D. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

0.29W higher power consumption when off Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a power consumption when off of 0.3W, whereas the Samsung S23E650D is a 0.01W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.29W lower).
8% heavier Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 4kg weight PC monitor. That's 280g lighter than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (4kg) and 280g heavier than the Samsung S23E650D (4kg).
£9 more expensive
The Samsung S24E650PL is more expensive than the Samsung S23E650D by £8.54.
Not as many stockists
Only 14 shops sells the Samsung S24E650PL, however 22 sellers sell the DELL UltraSharp 24. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Two months older
The Samsung S24E650PL is older than the Samsung S23E650D by two months.
More expensive to run over five years by 5%
The Samsung S24E650PL costs £41.89 to run which is £2.00 more to run than the DELL UltraSharp 24 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Samsung S24E650PL ranks No. 17092 by sales volume, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 ranks No. 7832.

Awards

1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

27 months Ago 19 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 36.85
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 39.89
Purchase price £ 156.00
Total cost of ownership £ 195.89
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -
Electricity cost - switched on £ 40.06
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 41.89
Purchase price £ 146.52
Total cost of ownership £ 188.41
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24.1"
BEST
23" 23.6"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
324mm
BEST
286.42mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
518.4mm
BEST
509.18mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Pixel Pitch
0.27 x 0.27 0.2652 x 0.2652 0.2715 x 0.2715
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
61.1cm Unknown - Click to provide data 59.94cm
Display Technology
 PLS
 PLS
 PLS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 4ms
BEST
4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 250 200
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Audio Output Port
 Audio output port
BEST
 Audio output port
 Audio output port
BEST
Audio Input Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input port
 Audio input port
BEST
DisplayPort
1 1 1
HDMI Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
5
BEST
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Power in Port
 AC power in port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Integrated TV Tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 30% 30%
Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Integrated Card Reader
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated card reader
 Integrated card reader
Windows Operating System
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN port
 Ethernet LAN port
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95 -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm 130mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-21 - 5 -3 - 25 -3 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45 -45 - 45
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
 Pivoting base
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator
 LED indicator

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.01W
BEST
0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
23W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 25W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 36kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
75W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5 Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3 Unknown - Click to provide data

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.4kg 7kg
BEST
7.1kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 186mm
BEST
406mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 397mm 185mm
BEST
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 620mm
BEST
632mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.4kg
BEST
5.6kg
Height With Stand
517.9mm 479.7mm
BEST
487.3mm
Depth With Stand
205mm
BEST
224mm 224mm
Width With Stand
532.2mm
BEST
542.9mm 554.6mm
Weight
4.3kg 3.7kg
BEST
4kg
Height
350.6mm 321.4mm 330.5mm
Depth
45.7mm 55.3mm 55.4mm
Width
532.2mm 542.9mm 554.6mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
Manual Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included
Stand Included
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User guide on CD-ROM
 User guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
 Game mode
Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
 ECO mode
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sleep timer
 Sleep timer
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 521.28 x 293.22
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
 No flickering
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback