Asus PB298 vs LG 29UC88 vs LG 29UM57-P vs LG 29UM68-P

(136)
(4)
Asus PB298
LG 29UC88
LG 29UM57-P
LG 29UM68-P

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 3 left!
eBay
Standard delivery: £47.44
Laptop Outlet
Out of stock
eBay
Standard delivery: £33.04
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
Debenhams Plus
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (33 available)
eBay
Standard delivery: £31.93
Value n' Price
Delivery unknown
In stock
Technoworld
Delivery unknown
In stock
Gameseek
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
16.77M more display colour count Edit
The Asus PB298 is a 16.77M display colours PC monitor, and so do the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM68-P. That's 16.77M more than the LG 29UM57-P (16.77M).
Vastly wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus PB298 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM68-P. That's 178° wider than the LG 29UM57-P (178°).
Vastly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus PB298 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178° (as do the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM68-P), however the LG 29UM57-P is only a unknown° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (178° narrower).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus PB298 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM68-P), however the LG 29UM57-P is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Asus PB298 is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 30mm higher than the LG 29UC88 () and 150mm higher than the LG 29UM57-P ().
Adjustable height Edit
The Asus PB298 has an adjustable height, and so does the LG 29UC88, but the LG 29UM57-P does not have an adjustable height.
Marginally narrower Edit
The Asus PB298 is a 700mm wide PC monitor, whereas the LG 29UC88 is a 700.9mm wide PC monitor (0.89999999999998mm wider), the LG 29UM57-P is a unknownmm wide PC monitor (700mm narrower) and the LG 29UM68-P is a 702.5mm wide PC monitor (2.5mm wider).
21% cheaper to run
The Asus PB298 only costs £50.80 to run over five years but the LG 29UC88 costs £64.10 to run (26% more) and the LG 29UM57-P costs £57.91 to run (14% more). Read more
13 Reasons For
More display colour count Edit
LG 29UC88 is 16.77M display colours (as do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UM68-P), but the LG 29UM57-P is only a unknownM display colours PC monitor (16.77M less).
178° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The LG 29UC88 has a vertical viewing angle of 178° (as do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UM68-P), whereas the LG 29UM57-P is only a unknown° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (178° narrower).
178° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UM68-P. That's 178° wider than the LG 29UM57-P (178°).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UM68-P. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 29UM57-P (300 cd/m²).
99% larger color gamut Edit
The LG 29UC88 has a color gamut of 99%, whereas the LG 29UM57-P is only a unknown% color gamut PC monitor (99% smaller).
Higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 14W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 11W higher than the Asus PB298 () and 14W higher than the LG 29UM57-P (). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Adjustable height Edit
The LG 29UC88 has an adjustable height (as does the Asus PB298), however the LG 29UM57-P does not have an adjustable height.
67% lower power consumption when off Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UM68-P. That's 0.2W lower than the Asus PB298 (0.3W) and 0.3W higher than the LG 29UM57-P (0.3W).
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 47kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 3kWh lower than the LG 29UM57-P ().
Significantly lighter Edit
The LG 29UC88 has a weight of 5.5kg, whereas the Asus PB298 is an 8.5kg weight PC monitor (3kg heavier), the LG 29UM57-P is a unknowng weight PC monitor (5.5kg lighter) and the LG 29UM68-P is a 6kg weight PC monitor (500g heavier).
Shorter Edit
LG 29UC88 is 316.5mm tall. That's 59.5mm shorter than the Asus PB298 (328.4mm), 316.5mm taller than the LG 29UM57-P (328.4mm) and 11.9mm shorter than the LG 29UM68-P (328.4mm).
28 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The LG 29UC88 has an energy efficiency rating of "B", whereas the LG 29UM57-P has a rating of "B" and the LG 29UM68-P has a rating of "B".
5 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the LG 29UM57-P is two (as does the LG 29UM68-P), but the LG 29UC88 only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper by £79
The LG 29UM57-P costs £178.26, whereas the Asus PB298 is £316.14, the LG 29UC88 is £269.11 and the LG 29UM68-P is £257.15.
Energy efficiency rating is higher
The LG 29UM57-P has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the LG 29UC88 has a rating of "B" and the LG 29UM68-P has a rating of "B".
Better expert reviews
Based on 1 expert review, the average review score of the LG 29UM57-P is 90%, but the average rating of the Asus PB298 is 85% (based on 23 reviews).
Much better user reviews
Based on 1 user review, the average review score of the LG 29UM57-P is 100%, but the average rating of the Asus PB298 is 83% (based on 113 reviews) and the average rating of the LG 29UC88 is 73% (based on 3 reviews).
9 Reasons For
16.77M more display colour count Edit
The LG 29UM68-P is a 16.77M display colours PC monitor (as do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UC88), whereas the LG 29UM57-P is only a unknownM display colours PC monitor (16.77M less).
Vastly wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The LG 29UM68-P has a vertical viewing angle of 178° (as do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UC88), however the LG 29UM57-P is only a unknown° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (178° narrower).
Vastly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The LG 29UM68-P is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UC88. That's 178° wider than the LG 29UM57-P (178°).
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 29UM68-P is a 73.66cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.63cm bigger than the Asus PB298 (73.66cm) and 0.66cm bigger than the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM57-P (73.66cm).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 29UM68-P is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UC88. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 29UM57-P (300 cd/m²).
One more HDMI port Edit
The LG 29UM68-P has two HDMI ports (as does the LG 29UM57-P), however the LG 29UC88 only has one HDMI port.
Lower power consumption when off Edit
The LG 29UM68-P is a 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UC88. That's 0.2W lower than the Asus PB298 (0.3W) and 0.3W higher than the LG 29UM57-P (0.3W).
Shallower Edit
The LG 29UM68-P has a depth of 63.8mm, however the Asus PB298 is a 218mm deep PC monitor (154.2mm deeper), the LG 29UC88 is a 99mm deep PC monitor (35.2mm deeper) and the LG 29UM57-P is a unknownmm deep PC monitor (63.8mm shallower).
Energy efficiency rating is better
The LG 29UM68-P has an energy efficiency rating of "B", however the LG 29UC88 has a rating of "B" and the LG 29UM57-P has a rating of "B".

Reasons Against

12 Reasons Against
Moderately smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus PB298 has a display diagonal of 73.03cm, however the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM57-P are both 73cm display diagonal PC monitors (0.030000000000001cm smaller) and the LG 29UM68-P is a 73.66cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.63cm bigger).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The Asus PB298 has one HDMI port, and so does the LG 29UC88, however the LG 29UM68-P only has two HDMI ports.
Significantly lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus PB298 has an RMS rated audio power of 3W, whereas the LG 29UC88 is a 14W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (11W higher) and the LG 29UM57-P is a unknownW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (3W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus PB298 has a power consumption when off of 0.5W, but the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM68-P are both 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitors (0.2W lower) and the LG 29UM57-P is a unknownW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.5W lower).
Vastly heavier Edit
The Asus PB298 is an 8.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 3kg heavier than the LG 29UC88 (6kg), 8.5kg heavier than the LG 29UM57-P (6kg) and 2.5kg heavier than the LG 29UM68-P (6kg).
376mm taller Edit
The Asus PB298 is a 376mm tall PC monitor, whereas the LG 29UC88 is a 316.5mm tall PC monitor (59.5mm shorter), the LG 29UM57-P is a unknownmm tall PC monitor (376mm shorter) and the LG 29UM68-P is a 328.4mm tall PC monitor (47.6mm shorter).
Vastly deeper Edit
The Asus PB298 has a depth of 218mm. That's 119mm deeper than the LG 29UC88 (63.8mm), 218mm deeper than the LG 29UM57-P (63.8mm) and 154.2mm deeper than the LG 29UM68-P (63.8mm).
£138 more expensive
The Asus PB298 is more expensive than the LG 29UC88 by £47.03, more expensive than the LG 29UM57-P by £137.88 and more expensive than the LG 29UM68-P by £58.99.
Less retailers
Only 12 retailers sells the Asus PB298, whereas 30 stores sell the LG 29UC88. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over two years older
The Asus PB298 is older than the LG 29UC88 by three years, older than the LG 29UM57-P by 18 months and older than the LG 29UM68-P by three years.
Lower expert review Score
The Asus PB298's average expert rating is 85%, however the LG 29UM57-P's is 90% (based on 1 review).
A lot Lower user review Score
The Asus PB298's average user rating is 83%, however the LG 29UM57-P's is 100% (based on 1 review).
8 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 73cm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UM57-P. That's 0.030000000000001cm smaller than the Asus PB298 (73.66cm) and 0.66cm smaller than the LG 29UM68-P (73.66cm).
One less HDMI port Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a one HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Asus PB298), whereas the LG 29UM68-P only has two HDMI ports.
25% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The LG 29UC88 has a maximum height adjustment of 120mm, however the Asus PB298 is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (30mm higher) and the LG 29UM57-P is a unknownmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (120mm lower).
99mm deeper Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 99mm deep PC monitor, whereas the Asus PB298 is a 218mm deep PC monitor (119mm deeper), the LG 29UM57-P is a unknownmm deep PC monitor (99mm shallower) and the LG 29UM68-P is a 63.8mm deep PC monitor (35.2mm shallower).
Wider Edit
LG 29UC88 is 700.9mm wide. That's 0.89999999999998mm wider than the Asus PB298 (702.5mm), 700.9mm wider than the LG 29UM57-P (702.5mm) and 1.6mm narrower than the LG 29UM68-P (702.5mm).
More expensive by £91
The LG 29UC88 is £90.85 more expensive than the LG 29UM57-P and £11.96 more expensive than the LG 29UM68-P.
Higher running costs over five years by £13.30
The running costs over five years of the LG 29UC88 are £64.10 which is £13.30 more than the Asus PB298 and £6.19 more than the LG 29UM57-P. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is significantly Worse
The average user rating of the LG 29UC88 is only 73%, whereas the average user rating of the Asus PB298 is 83% (based on 113 reviews) and the LG 29UM57-P is 100% (based on 1 review).
7 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 29UM57-P is a 73cm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UC88. That's 0.030000000000001cm smaller than the Asus PB298 (73.66cm) and 0.66cm smaller than the LG 29UM68-P (73.66cm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 29UM57-P is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus PB298, the LG 29UC88 and the LG 29UM68-P (300 cd/m²).
Does not have an adjustable height Edit
The LG 29UM57-P does not have an adjustable height, however the Asus PB298 and the LG 29UC88 have an adjustable height.
6% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 29UM57-P is a 50kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 3kWh higher than the LG 29UC88 ().
Not as many stockists
The LG 29UM57-P is only stocked by 2 stores, however the Asus PB298 is stocked by 12 retailers and the LG 29UC88 is stocked by 30 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over one year
The LG 29UM57-P is 14 months older than the LG 29UC88 and one year older than the LG 29UM68-P.
£7.11 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs over five years of the LG 29UM57-P are £57.91 which is £7.11 more than the Asus PB298. Show assumptions.
6 Reasons Against
Vastly heavier Edit
The LG 29UM68-P has a weight of 6kg, however the Asus PB298 is an 8.5kg weight PC monitor (2.5kg heavier), the LG 29UC88 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (500g lighter) and the LG 29UM57-P is a unknowng weight PC monitor (6kg lighter).
328.4mm taller Edit
The LG 29UM68-P is a 328.4mm tall PC monitor. That's 47.6mm shorter than the Asus PB298 (328.4mm), 11.9mm taller than the LG 29UC88 (328.4mm) and 328.4mm taller than the LG 29UM57-P (328.4mm).
702.5mm wider Edit
The LG 29UM68-P is a 702.5mm wide PC monitor. That's 2.5mm wider than the Asus PB298 (702.5mm), 1.6mm wider than the LG 29UC88 (702.5mm) and 702.5mm wider than the LG 29UM57-P (702.5mm).
More expensive by £79
The LG 29UM68-P is £78.89 more expensive than the LG 29UM57-P.
Less retailers
The LG 29UM68-P is only stocked by 2 sellers, whereas the Asus PB298 is stocked by 12 sellers and the LG 29UC88 is stocked by 30 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by two months
The LG 29UM68-P is two months older than the LG 29UC88.

Awards

7 Awards
3dnews.ru: Recommended
digitallife.se: Recommended
gagadget.com: Recommended
hardwareheaven.com: Gold Award
hwa.com.tr: Functionality Award
vido.com.ua: Recommended
xfastest.com: Fastest Media
No awards found No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

41 months Ago 10 months Ago 23 months Ago 11 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 50.80
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 50.80
Purchase price £ 316.14
Total cost of ownership £ 366.94
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 64.10
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 64.10
Purchase price £ 269.11
Total cost of ownership £ 333.21
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 56.08
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 57.91
Purchase price £ 178.26
Total cost of ownership £ 236.17
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.32T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.32 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
29" 29" 29" 29"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
BEST
 LED
BEST
 LED
 LED
BEST
3D Compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1080
BEST
 2560 x 1080
BEST
 2560 x 1080
BEST
 2560 x 1080
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
SRGB Display Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 SRGB display feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
24 - 76 56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
26 - 83 30 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2628 x 0.2628 0.2628 x 0.2628 Unknown - Click to provide data 0.265 x 0.265
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
73.03cm 73cm 73cm 73.66cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms 5ms Unknown - Click to provide data 5ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99% Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
BEST
 21:9
 21:9
BEST
 21:9
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Digital audio optical out port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
PC Audio in
 PC audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC audio in
Headphone Output
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
PC Audio Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio out port
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
1 1 2
BEST
2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
3W 14W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm 120mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
BEST
 Adjustable height
BEST
 Adjustable height
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
20 - 5 -5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
60 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 14
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
 B
BEST
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
31.7W
BEST
40W 35W Unknown - Click to provide data
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 47kWh
BEST
50kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 53W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 47/66
 47/66
 47/66
 47/66
AC Input Voltage
 24
 110
 110-240
 240
 24
 110
 110-240
 240
 24
 110
 110-240
 240
 24
 110
 110-240
 240

Certificates

Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
12.2kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 11kg
BEST
Packaging Height
437mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 412mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
253mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 143mm
BEST
Packaging Width
804mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 780mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
8.5kg 6.2kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg
Height With Stand
376mm
BEST
396.22mm Unknown - Click to provide data 414mm
Depth With Stand
218mm 252.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data 204.7mm
BEST
Width With Stand
700mm
BEST
700.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data 702.5mm
Weight
8.5kg 5.5kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 6kg
Height
376mm 316.5mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 328.4mm
Depth
218mm 99mm Unknown - Click to provide data 63.8mm
BEST
Width
700mm
BEST
700.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data 702.5mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Included
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
BEST
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
BEST
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
Manual Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Colours
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77
Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 300
Resolution
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 60
Contrast Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Picture Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Custom, Reader, Photo, Cinema, Color Weakness, FPS Game 1, FPS Game 2, RTS Game, Custom (Game) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 677.04 x 290.16
Feedback