Benq EW2750ZL vs Benq RL2755

(16)
(123)
Benq EW2750ZL
Benq RL2755

Top Prices

Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: £108.67
Uk-Computers
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Novatech
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £3.99
In stock

Reasons For

10 Reasons For
1% bigger viewable height Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 336.2mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.050000000000011mm bigger than the Benq RL2755 (336.15mm).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (160°).
Moderately wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, whereas the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Lighter Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg lighter than the Benq RL2755 (5.5kg).
A little shorter Edit
Benq EW2750ZL is 458.5mm tall, but the Benq RL2755 is a 478mm tall PC monitor (19.5mm taller).
Shallower Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 194.9mm deep PC monitor. That's 18.1mm shallower than the Benq RL2755 (213mm).
25.2mm narrower Edit
Benq EW2750ZL is 613.8mm wide, but the Benq RL2755 is a 639mm wide PC monitor (25.2mm wider).
£21 cheaper
The Benq EW2750ZL is £21.01 cheaper than the Benq RL2755.
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
User reviews are a bit better
Based on 11 reviews, the Benq EW2750ZL has an average user review score of 96%, whereas the Benq RL2755 has an average rating of 94% (based on 107 reviews).
3 Reasons For
Hugely faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the Benq EW2750ZL (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

46% cheaper to run
The Benq RL2755 is £33.32 cheaper to run than the Benq EW2750ZL over five years. Read more
More popular
The Benq RL2755 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 2741 by sales volume in our PC monitors, however the Benq EW2750ZL ranks No. 12043.

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

86% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the Benq EW2750ZL are £72.11 which is £33.32 more than the Benq RL2755. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Benq EW2750ZL ranks No. 12043 by sales volume, whereas the Benq RL2755 ranks No. 2741.
11 Reasons Against
1% smaller viewable height Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 336.15mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.050000000000011mm smaller than the Benq EW2750ZL (336.15mm).
12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Benq EW2750ZL (160°).
A little narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°, however the Benq EW2750ZL is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
22% heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg heavier than the Benq EW2750ZL (5.5kg).
Marginally taller Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 478mm tall PC monitor, whereas the Benq EW2750ZL is a 458.5mm tall PC monitor (19.5mm shorter).
Deeper Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a depth of 213mm. That's 18.1mm deeper than the Benq EW2750ZL (213mm).
25.2mm wider Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 639mm wide PC monitor, whereas the Benq EW2750ZL is a 613.8mm wide PC monitor (25.2mm narrower).
£21 more expensive
The Benq RL2755 is more expensive than the Benq EW2750ZL by £21.01.
Less retailers
Only 24 sellers sells the Benq RL2755, whereas 25 shops sell the Benq EW2750ZL. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Four months older
The Benq RL2755 is older than the Benq EW2750ZL by four months.
Slightly Lower user review Score
The Benq RL2755's average user rating is 94%, however the Benq EW2750ZL's is 96% (based on 11 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

20 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 72.11
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 72.11
Purchase price £ 178.97
Total cost of ownership £ 251.08
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 38.79
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 38.79
Purchase price £ 199.98
Total cost of ownership £ 238.77
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.36T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D compatible
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Height
336.2mm
BEST
336.15mm
Viewable Width
597.6mm 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
 Headphone out port
 Headphone out port
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Input Port
 Audio input port
 Audio input port
HDMI Port
2 2
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
AC Power in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC power in port

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
4W 4W
Loudspeaker
2 2
Integrated TV Tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated TV tuner
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Adjustable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
OSD Language
17 17
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
45W 24.21W
BEST
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
 90 - 264
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
4.3kg
BEST
5.5kg
Height
458.5mm
BEST
478mm
Depth
194.9mm
BEST
213mm
Width
613.8mm
BEST
639mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 VGA
 HDMI
Manual Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
28W Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Video Bandwidth
205 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback