Acer Predator Z35 vs LG 29UC88

(13)
(4)
Acer Predator Z35
LG 29UC88

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £5.28
In stock
Misco
Standard delivery: £5.99
eBay
Overclockers UK
Out of stock
eBay
Standard delivery: £32.81
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
18% bigger screen size Edit
The Acer Predator Z35 has a screen size of 35", however the LG 29UC88 is only a 29" PC monitor (6" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer Predator Z35 has a display diagonal of 89cm, however the LG 29UC88 is only a 73cm display diagonal PC monitor (16cm smaller).
Faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator Z35 is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the LG 29UC88 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

4W higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Acer Predator Z35 has an RMS rated audio power of 18W, whereas the LG 29UC88 is only a 14W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

8% higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer Predator Z35 is a 130mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 10mm higher than the LG 29UC88 (120mm).
User reviews are a lot better
The Acer Predator Z35 has an average user review score of 89% based on 11 reviews, however the LG 29UC88 has an average rating of 73% (based on 3 reviews).
3 Reasons For
22kWh lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 29UC88 has an annual energy consumption of 47kWh, however the Acer Predator Z35 is a 69kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (22kWh higher).
£615 cheaper
The LG 29UC88 is £615.48 cheaper than the Acer Predator Z35.
Available from 13 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer Predator Z35 has an annual energy consumption of 69kWh, but the LG 29UC88 is a 47kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (22kWh lower).
£615 more expensive
The Acer Predator Z35 is more expensive than the LG 29UC88 by £615.48.
Less retailers
Only 15 shops sells the Acer Predator Z35, whereas 28 shops sell the LG 29UC88. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Nine months older
The Acer Predator Z35 is older than the LG 29UC88 by nine months.
6 Reasons Against
6" smaller screen size Edit
The LG 29UC88 has a screen size of 29", whereas the Acer Predator Z35 is a 35" PC monitor (6" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

16cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 29UC88 has a display diagonal of 73cm, whereas the Acer Predator Z35 is an 89cm display diagonal PC monitor (16cm bigger).
20% slower response time Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Acer Predator Z35 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

4W lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The LG 29UC88 has an RMS rated audio power of 14W, but the Acer Predator Z35 is an 18W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The LG 29UC88 is a 120mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 10mm lower than the Acer Predator Z35 (120mm).
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the LG 29UC88 is only 73%, whereas the average user rating of the Acer Predator Z35 is 89% (based on 11 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

18 months Ago 10 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -
Electricity cost - switched on £ 64.10
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 64.10
Purchase price £ 267.21
Total cost of ownership £ 331.31
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.32T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.32 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
35"
BEST
29"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1080
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2628 x 0.2628
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
Display Diagonal
89cm
BEST
73cm
Display Technology
 LCD
 LCD
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
5ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
BEST
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Digital Audio Optical Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Digital audio optical out port
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
RMS Rated Audio Power
18W
BEST
14W
Loudspeaker
2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
130mm
BEST
120mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
52W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 40W
Standby Power Consumption
52W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
69kWh 47kWh
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 24
 110
 110-240
 240
 24
 110
 110-240
 240

Certificates

Energy Star Certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 396.22mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 252.4mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 700.9mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.5kg
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 316.5mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 99mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 700.9mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 HDMI
BEST

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Picture Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Custom, Reader, Photo, Cinema, Color Weakness, FPS Game 1, FPS Game 2, RTS Game, Custom (Game)
Feedback