Acer Predator XB271H vs LG 24MB35PH

Acer Predator XB271H
LG 24MB35PH

Top Prices

Ebuyer
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (142 available)
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Littlewoods
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (46 available)
Ebuyer
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 5 left!
Misco
Standard delivery: £14.39
Insight
Delivery unknown
In stock (193 available)

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
3.2" bigger screen size Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 27" PC monitor. That's 3.2" bigger than the LG 24MB35PH (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

9cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 69cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 9cm bigger than the LG 24MB35PH (60cm).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 24MB35PH (250 cd/m²).
4x faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a response time of 1ms, however the LG 24MB35PH is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

20% higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a maximum height adjustment of 150mm, however the LG 24MB35PH is only a 120mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (30mm lower).
Cheaper to run by £3.60
Over five years the Acer Predator XB271H is £3.60 cheaper to run than the LG 24MB35PH. Read more
Better selling
The Acer Predator XB271H ranks No. 63251 by number of sales, whereas the LG 24MB35PH ranks No. 78561.
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Acer Predator XB271H has an energy efficiency rating of "B", whereas the LG 24MB35PH has a rating of "B".
11 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Acer Predator XB271H (178°).
Marginally wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Vastly lower power consumption when off Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a power consumption when off of 0.3W, however the Acer Predator XB271H is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.15W higher).
13kWh lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has an annual energy consumption of 37kWh, however the Acer Predator XB271H is a 50kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (13kWh higher).
Lighter Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 5.1kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.6kg lighter than the Acer Predator XB271H (5.1kg).
Shorter Edit
LG 24MB35PH is 342mm tall, but the Acer Predator XB271H is a 415mm tall PC monitor (73mm taller).
Significantly shallower Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 63mm deep PC monitor. That's 205mm shallower than the Acer Predator XB271H (63mm).
Narrower Edit
LG 24MB35PH is 569mm wide, but the Acer Predator XB271H is a 640mm wide PC monitor (71mm wider).
£307 cheaper
The LG 24MB35PH is £306.79 cheaper than the Acer Predator XB271H.
Available from 11 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 24MB35PH is "B", whereas the rating of the Acer Predator XB271H is "B".

Reasons Against

10 Reasons Against
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a vertical viewing angle of 160°, whereas the LG 24MB35PH is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the LG 24MB35PH (178°).
34% higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.15W higher than the LG 24MB35PH (0.3W).
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 50kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 13kWh higher than the LG 24MB35PH (37kWh).
A lot heavier Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a weight of 7.7kg, whereas the LG 24MB35PH is a 5.1kg weight PC monitor (2.6kg lighter).
Taller Edit
Acer Predator XB271H is 415mm tall. That's 73mm taller than the LG 24MB35PH (342mm).
Significantly deeper Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 268mm deep PC monitor, whereas the LG 24MB35PH is a 63mm deep PC monitor (205mm shallower).
Wider Edit
Acer Predator XB271H is 640mm wide. That's 71mm wider than the LG 24MB35PH (569mm).
More expensive by £307
The Acer Predator XB271H is £306.79 more expensive than the LG 24MB35PH.
Fewer sellers
The Acer Predator XB271H is only stocked by 14 stores, but the LG 24MB35PH is stocked by 25 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
8 Reasons Against
3.2" smaller screen size Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a screen size of 23.8", whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is a 27" PC monitor (3.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

9cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a display diagonal of 60cm, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is a 69cm display diagonal PC monitor (9cm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Acer Predator XB271H (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

25% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 120mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 30mm lower than the Acer Predator XB271H (120mm).
Seven months older
The LG 24MB35PH is older than the Acer Predator XB271H by seven months.
7% higher running costs over five years
The LG 24MB35PH costs £53.11 to run which is £3.60 more to run than the Acer Predator XB271H over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The LG 24MB35PH ranks No. 78561 by sales volume, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H ranks No. 63251.

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

12 months Ago 19 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 46.47
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 49.51
Purchase price £ 439.98
Total cost of ownership £ 489.49
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 51.28
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 53.11
Purchase price £ 133.19
Total cost of ownership £ 186.30
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.26T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.26 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27"
BEST
23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
SRGB Display Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 SRGB display feature
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Viewable Height
336mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
598mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.275 x 0.275
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
69cm
BEST
60cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Power in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC power in port

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
RMS Rated Audio Power
2W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
-90 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
120mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
Swivel Angle Range
-60 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivoting Base
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.2A
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
Power Consumption When Off
0.45W 0.3W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
29W
BEST
32W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
50kWh 37kWh
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 139mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 414mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 639mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.5kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 432mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 271mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 569mm
Weight
7.7kg 5.1kg
BEST
Height
415mm 342mm
BEST
Depth
268mm 63mm
BEST
Width
640mm 569mm
BEST
Feedback