Benq RL2755 vs Samsung S24E650PL

(123)
Benq RL2755
Samsung S24E650PL

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Novatech
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £6.90
In stock
Ebuyer
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 4 left!
9 to 5 Supplies
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
3.4" bigger screen size Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 27" PC monitor. That's 3.4" bigger than the Samsung S24E650PL (23.6"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S24E650PL (250 cd/m²).
Faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a response time of 1ms, however the Samsung S24E650PL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24E650PL only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper to run by £3.10
Over five years the Benq RL2755 only costs £38.79 to run however the Samsung S24E650PL costs £41.89 to run (8% more). Read more
Better selling
The Benq RL2755 ranks No. 1743 by number of sales, whereas the Samsung S24E650PL ranks No. 27243.
7 Reasons For
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a vertical viewing angle of 178°, however the Benq RL2755 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (178°).
Adjustable height Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has an adjustable height, but the Benq RL2755 does not have an adjustable height.
1.5kg lighter Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a weight of 4kg, however the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (1.5kg heavier).
Cheaper by £49
The Samsung S24E650PL costs £49.14 less than the Benq RL2755.
5 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Better user reviews
Based on 2 user reviews, the average review score of the Samsung S24E650PL is 100%, however the average rating of the Benq RL2755 is 94% (based on 107 reviews).

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°, whereas the Samsung S24E650PL is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Samsung S24E650PL (178°).
Does not have an adjustable height Edit
The Benq RL2755 does not have an adjustable height, but the Samsung S24E650PL has an adjustable height.
1.5kg heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a weight of 5.5kg, whereas the Samsung S24E650PL is a 4kg weight PC monitor (1.5kg lighter).
More expensive by £49
The Benq RL2755 is £49.14 more expensive than the Samsung S24E650PL.
Fewer sellers
The Benq RL2755 is only stocked by 11 sellers, but the Samsung S24E650PL is stocked by 16 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by three months
The Benq RL2755 is three months older than the Samsung S24E650PL.
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the Benq RL2755 is 94%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung S24E650PL is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
15% smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 23.6" PC monitor. That's 3.4" smaller than the Benq RL2755 (23.6"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Benq RL2755 (250 cd/m²).
3ms slower response time Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a response time of 4ms, but the Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has one HDMI port, however the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports.
£3.10 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the Samsung S24E650PL are £41.89 which is £3.10 more than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Samsung S24E650PL is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 27243 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the Benq RL2755 ranks No. 1743.

Awards

2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

24 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 38.79
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 38.79
Purchase price £ 199.98
Total cost of ownership £ 238.77
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 40.06
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 41.89
Purchase price £ 150.84
Total cost of ownership £ 192.73
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27"
BEST
23.6"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
336.15mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.2715 x 0.2715
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 59.94cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
4ms
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 200
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
 Headphone out port
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Output Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output port
Audio Input Port
 Audio input port
 Audio input port
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Power in Port
 AC power in port
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 30%
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Integrated Card Reader
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated card reader

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN port
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -3 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling base
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
 LED indicator
 LED indicator

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
24.21W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 36kWh
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.1kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 406mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 185mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 632mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.6kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 487.3mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 224mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 554.6mm
Weight
5.5kg 4kg
BEST
Height
478mm 330.5mm
Depth
213mm 55.4mm
Width
639mm 554.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 USB
 VGA
Manual Included
 Manual included
 Manual included
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sleep timer
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 521.28 x 293.22
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Feedback