Benq RL2455 vs Samsung S22B420BW

(304)
Benq RL2455
Samsung S22B420BW

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (40 available)
Maplin Electronics
FREE Standard delivery
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £3.00
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
9% bigger screen size Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 24" PC monitor. That's 2" bigger than the Samsung S22B420BW (22"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 60.96cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 5.08cm bigger than the Samsung S22B420BW (55.88cm).
4ms faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a response time of 1ms, but the Samsung S22B420BW is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Vastly better user reviews
The average user review score of the Benq RL2455 is 92% based on 295 reviews, however the average rating of the Samsung S22B420BW is 60% (based on 1 review).
7 Reasons For
Adjustable height Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has an adjustable height, but the Benq RL2455 does not have an adjustable height.
Swivelling base Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a swivelling base, but the Benq RL2455 does not have a swivelling base.
Pivoting base Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a pivoting base, however the Benq RL2455 does not have a pivoting base.
Shorter Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW is a 331.5mm tall PC monitor. That's 103.5mm shorter than the Benq RL2455 (331.5mm).
3x shallower Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a depth of 60.25mm, however the Benq RL2455 is a 189mm deep PC monitor (128.75mm deeper).
73.5mm narrower Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW is a 505.5mm wide PC monitor. That's 73.5mm narrower than the Benq RL2455 (505.5mm).
10% cheaper to run
Over five years the Samsung S22B420BW only costs £41.89 to run but the Benq RL2455 costs £46.30 to run (11% more). Read more

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
Does not have an adjustable height Edit
The Benq RL2455 does not have an adjustable height, whereas the Samsung S22B420BW does.
Does not have a swivelling base Edit
The Benq RL2455 does not have a swivelling base, whereas the Samsung S22B420BW has a swivelling base.
Does not have a pivoting base Edit
The Benq RL2455 does not have a pivoting base, but the Samsung S22B420BW has a pivoting base.
103.5mm taller Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 435mm tall PC monitor. That's 103.5mm taller than the Samsung S22B420BW (331.5mm).
Vastly deeper Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a depth of 189mm, however the Samsung S22B420BW is a 60.25mm deep PC monitor (128.75mm shallower).
73.5mm wider Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 579mm wide PC monitor. That's 73.5mm wider than the Samsung S22B420BW (505.5mm).
Older by ten months
The Benq RL2455 is ten months older than the Samsung S22B420BW.
Higher running costs over five years by £4.41
The running costs over five years of the Benq RL2455 are £46.30 which is £4.41 more than the Samsung S22B420BW. Show assumptions.
5 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW is a 22" PC monitor. That's 2" smaller than the Benq RL2455 (22"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

10% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW is a 55.88cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 5.08cm smaller than the Benq RL2455 (55.88cm).
4ms slower response time Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a response time of 5ms, but the Benq RL2455 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
User review Rating is vastly Worse
The Samsung S22B420BW's average user score is only 60%, however the Benq RL2455's is 92% (based on 295 reviews).

Awards

1 Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

40 months Ago 30 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 43.26
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 46.30
Purchase price £ 129.99
Total cost of ownership £ 176.29
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 40.06
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 41.89

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.23T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24"
BEST
22"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1680 x 1050
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1680 x 1050
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.276 x 0.276 0.282 x 0.282
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
60.96cm
BEST
55.88cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Input Port
 Audio input port
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI-D Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
AC Power in Port
 AC power in port
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating system
Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
 Ethernet LAN port
 Ethernet LAN port
WiFi
 WiFi
 WiFi
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture Mode
 Picture-in-Picture mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 115
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 100mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 22
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
BEST
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
 Pivoting base
BEST
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
27W 25W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Input Voltage
 96 - 264
BEST
 96 - 264
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.7kg 5.5kg
BEST
Packaging Height
420mm 406mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
134mm
BEST
192mm
Packaging Width
650mm 582mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
4.1kg 4.1kg
Height With Stand
435mm 359.25mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
189mm
BEST
220mm
Width With Stand
579mm 505.5mm
BEST
Weight
4.1kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
435mm 331.5mm
BEST
Depth
189mm 60.25mm
BEST
Width
579mm 505.5mm
BEST

Other Features

Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback