Acer B346CK vs Philips 275P4VYKEB

Acer B346CK
Philips 275P4VYKEB

Top Prices

No prices found
Daw Computers
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 34" PC monitor. That's 7" bigger than the Philips 275P4VYKEB (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

26% bigger viewable width Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 796mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 199.26mm bigger than the Philips 275P4VYKEB (596.74mm).
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer B346CK is an 86.4cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 17.8cm bigger than the Philips 275P4VYKEB (68.6cm).
7% brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 20 cd/m² brighter than the Philips 275P4VYKEB (300 cd/m²).
A lot faster response time Edit
The Acer B346CK has a response time of 6ms, whereas the Philips 275P4VYKEB is an 8ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

£51.25 cheaper to run
Over five years the Acer B346CK is £51.25 cheaper to run than the Philips 275P4VYKEB. Read more
6 Reasons For
2.66mm bigger viewable height Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB has a viewable height of 335.66mm, but the Acer B346CK is only a 333mm viewable height PC monitor (2.66mm smaller).
Hugely longer mean time between failures Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB has a mean time between failures of 70,000h, but the Acer B346CK is only a 30,000h mean time between failures PC monitor (40,000h shorter). Read more

THE Mean time before failure (mtbf) indicates the expected smooth lifetime of the product in terms of its actual use. This is arrived at through extensive testing of the product. After 30,000 hours it may work for another 30,000 but there are no guarantees.

Two times lighter Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB has a weight of 5.3kg, but the Acer B346CK is a 10.8kg weight PC monitor (5.5kg heavier).
46% shorter Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB has a height of 405mm. That's 184mm shorter than the Acer B346CK (405mm).
3x shallower Edit
Philips 275P4VYKEB is 64mm deep, but the Acer B346CK is a 243mm deep PC monitor (179mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB has a width of 639mm. That's 188mm narrower than the Acer B346CK (639mm).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
2.66mm smaller viewable height Edit
The Acer B346CK has a viewable height of 333mm, but the Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 335.66mm viewable height PC monitor (2.66mm bigger).
Two times shorter mean time between failures Edit
The Acer B346CK has a mean time between failures of 30,000h, but the Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 70,000h mean time between failures PC monitor (40,000h longer). Read more

THE Mean time before failure (mtbf) indicates the expected smooth lifetime of the product in terms of its actual use. This is arrived at through extensive testing of the product. After 30,000 hours it may work for another 30,000 but there are no guarantees.

Hugely heavier Edit
The Acer B346CK has a weight of 10.8kg, but the Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 5.3kg weight PC monitor (5.5kg lighter).
32% taller Edit
The Acer B346CK has a height of 589mm. That's 184mm taller than the Philips 275P4VYKEB (405mm).
Hugely deeper Edit
Acer B346CK is 243mm deep, but the Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 64mm deep PC monitor (179mm shallower).
23% wider Edit
The Acer B346CK has a width of 827mm. That's 188mm wider than the Philips 275P4VYKEB (639mm).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
7 Reasons Against
26% smaller screen size Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 27" PC monitor. That's 7" smaller than the Acer B346CK (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

34% smaller viewable width Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 596.74mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 199.26mm smaller than the Acer B346CK (596.74mm).
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 17.8cm smaller than the Acer B346CK (68.6cm).
7% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 20 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer B346CK (300 cd/m²).
2ms slower response time Edit
The Philips 275P4VYKEB has a response time of 8ms, whereas the Acer B346CK is a 6ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Older by five months
The Philips 275P4VYKEB is five months older than the Acer B346CK.
Higher running costs over five years by £51.25
Over five years the running costs of the Philips 275P4VYKEB are £139.88 which is £51.25 more than the Acer B346CK. Show assumptions.

Date Released

11 months Ago 16 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 85.89
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.74
Total running cost £ 88.63
Electricity cost - switched on £ 136.84
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 139.88
Purchase price £ 1,394.02
Total cost of ownership £ 1,533.90
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.44T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.44 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
11
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.69T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.69 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
34"
BEST
27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3440 x 1440
 3840 x 2160
 3440 x 1440
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
HD Type
 5K Ultra HD
 5K Ultra HD
BEST
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
SRGB Display Feature
 SRGB display feature
 SRGB display feature
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Viewable Height
333mm 335.66mm
BEST
Viewable Width
796mm
BEST
596.74mm
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.117 x 0.117
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
86.4cm
BEST
68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
320 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms
BEST
8ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours
Pixel Density
109.7 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
HDMI Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
Built-In Microphone
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in microphone
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Megapixel Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 2MP

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 65%
Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Mac Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating system
Mean Time Between Failures
30,000h 70,000h
BEST

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm 150mm
Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
 Swivelling base
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 60 -65 - 65
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivoting Base
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivoting base
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
BEST
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
BEST
 C
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W
Typical Power Consumption
53.6W
BEST
85.4W
Standby Power Consumption
0.45W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
88kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
88W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 100
 100-240
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 100
 100-240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
20 - 65 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
14.9kg 12kg
BEST
Packaging Height
678mm 234mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
247mm
BEST
490mm
Packaging Width
943mm 750mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
10.8kg 8.1kg
BEST
Height With Stand
589mm 580mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
267mm
BEST
273mm
Width With Stand
827mm 639mm
BEST
Weight
10.8kg 5.3kg
BEST
Height
589mm 405mm
BEST
Depth
243mm 64mm
BEST
Width
827mm 639mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 AC
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 AC
Stand Included
 Stand included
 Stand included
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 45.1W
Power Consumption When Active
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.9W
Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 750 x 234 x 490
Dimensions With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 639 x 580 x 273

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Power Supply Type
Internes Netsteil Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback