Benq GW2265 vs Philips 243V5

(5)
Benq GW2265
Philips 243V5

Top Prices

Carbon8
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq GW2265 has a vertical viewing angle of 178°, whereas the Philips 243V5 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq GW2265 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Philips 243V5 (170°).
Narrower Edit
Benq GW2265 is 510.24mm wide. That's 40.76mm narrower than the Philips 243V5 (551mm).
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Benq GW2265 is 80% based on 1 review, whereas the average rating of the Philips 243V5 is 75% (based on 1 review).
8 Reasons For
9% bigger screen size Edit
The Philips 243V5 is a 23.6" PC monitor. That's 2.1" bigger than the Benq GW2265 (23.6"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.11mm bigger viewable height Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a viewable height of 293.22mm, but the Benq GW2265 is only a 268.11mm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm smaller).
9% bigger viewable width Edit
The Philips 243V5 is a 521.28mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 44.64mm bigger than the Benq GW2265 (521.28mm).
Five times faster response time Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a response time of 1ms, whereas the Benq GW2265 is a 6ms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in speaker Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a built-in speaker, but the Benq GW2265 does not have a built-in speaker. Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

A little lighter Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a weight of 3.2kg, but the Benq GW2265 is a 3.4kg weight PC monitor (180g heavier).
16% shorter Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a height of 344mm. That's 52.96mm shorter than the Benq GW2265 (344mm).
Shallower Edit
Philips 243V5 is 52mm deep, but the Benq GW2265 is a 185.74mm deep PC monitor (133.74mm deeper).

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
10% smaller screen size Edit
The Benq GW2265 is a 21.5" PC monitor. That's 2.1" smaller than the Philips 243V5 (23.6"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.11mm smaller viewable height Edit
The Benq GW2265 has a viewable height of 268.11mm, whereas the Philips 243V5 is a 293.22mm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm bigger).
10% smaller viewable width Edit
The Benq GW2265 is a 476.64mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 44.64mm smaller than the Philips 243V5 (521.28mm).
Vastly slower response time Edit
The Benq GW2265 has a response time of 6ms, however the Philips 243V5 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (5ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker Edit
The Benq GW2265 does not have a built-in speaker, however the Philips 243V5 has a built-in speaker. Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Moderately heavier Edit
The Benq GW2265 has a weight of 3.4kg, whereas the Philips 243V5 is a 3.2kg weight PC monitor (180g lighter).
Taller Edit
Benq GW2265 is 396.96mm tall. That's 52.96mm taller than the Philips 243V5 (344mm).
Significantly deeper Edit
The Benq GW2265 is a 185.74mm deep PC monitor, whereas the Philips 243V5 is a 52mm deep PC monitor (133.74mm shallower).
6 Reasons Against
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°, but the Benq GW2265 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Philips 243V5 is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Benq GW2265 (170°).
Wider Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a width of 551mm. That's 40.76mm wider than the Benq GW2265 (551mm).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over one year
The Philips 243V5 is 18 months older than the Benq GW2265.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The Philips 243V5 only has an average expert score of 75%, but the Benq GW2265 has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 1 review).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

24 months Ago 41 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -
Electricity cost - switched on £ 38.46
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 41.50

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
21.5" 23.6"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
SRGB Display Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 SRGB display feature
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Height
268.11mm 293.22mm
BEST
Viewable Width
476.64mm 521.28mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.248 x 0.248 0.272 x 0.272
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 59.9cm
Display Technology
 VA
 VA
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms 1ms
BEST
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data 1ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC audio in
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
AC Power in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC power in port

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
BEST
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Mac Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating system
Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data 30,000h

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN port
WiFi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 WiFi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Wall Mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wall mountable
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
BEST
OSD Language
17 21
BEST
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
 On screen menu display

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
0.3W 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 24W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 34kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
26W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
Compliance Industry Standard
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
4.4kg
BEST
5kg
Packaging Height
400mm
BEST
415mm
Packaging Depth
110mm
BEST
118mm
Packaging Width
581mm
BEST
600mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.7kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 420mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 220mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 551mm
Weight
3.4kg 3.2kg
BEST
Height
396.96mm 344mm
BEST
Depth
185.74mm 52mm
BEST
Width
510.24mm
BEST
551mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
BEST
 VGA

Other Features

Power Consumption When Active
Unknown - Click to provide data 18.05W
Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 600 x 415 x 118
Dimensions With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 551 x 420 x 220
Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.14kg
Regulatory Approvals
Unknown - Click to provide data BSMI, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC Class B, GOST, PSB, SASO, SEMKO, TCO certified, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEE
Recyclable Packaging Material
Unknown - Click to provide data 100
Feedback