Benq EW2750ZL vs Benq GW2750 vs Benq RL2755

(16)
(10)
(123)
Benq EW2750ZL
Benq GW2750
Benq RL2755

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £6.90
In stock
PC World Business
Delivery unknown
In stock (27 available)
Flubit Deals
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Novatech
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
Bigger viewable height Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 336.2mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.050000000000011mm bigger than the Benq RL2755 (336.15mm).
4% more display colour count Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a display colour count of 16.77M. That's 0.57M more than the Benq GW2750 ().
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the Benq GW2750. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (160°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a horizontal viewing angle of 178° (as does the Benq GW2750), but the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Benq EW2750ZL is two, and so does the Benq RL2755, but the Benq GW2750 only has one HDMI port.
31% lighter Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg lighter than the Benq GW2750 (5.5kg) and 1.2kg lighter than the Benq RL2755 (5.5kg).
£1 cheaper
The Benq EW2750ZL costs £179.98, whereas the Benq GW2750 is £179.99 and the Benq RL2755 is £199.98.
User reviews are marginally better
The Benq EW2750ZL has an average user review score of 96%, but the Benq RL2755 has an average rating of 94% (based on 107 reviews).
2 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the Benq EW2750ZL. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (160°).
A bit wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq GW2750 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178° (as does the Benq EW2750ZL), whereas the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
6 Reasons For
3ms faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the Benq EW2750ZL and the Benq GW2750 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the Benq EW2750ZL, whereas the Benq GW2750 only has one HDMI port.
Available from 4 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by £33.32
The Benq RL2755 only costs £38.79 to run over five years however the Benq EW2750ZL costs £72.11 to run (86% more) and the Benq GW2750 costs £48.07 to run (24% more). Read more
More popular
The Benq RL2755 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 1342 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the Benq EW2750ZL ranks No. 22551.
One more awards
The Benq RL2755 has 2 awards, but the Benq GW2750 has 1 award.

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
75% slower response time Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Benq GW2750. That's 3ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Not as many stockists
Only 10 shops sells the Benq EW2750ZL, however 14 retailers sell the Benq RL2755. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
More expensive to run over five years by 86%
The running costs of the Benq EW2750ZL are £72.11 which is £24.04 more than the Benq GW2750 and £33.32 more than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Benq EW2750ZL ranks No. 22551 by sales volume, but the Benq RL2755 ranks No. 1342.
9 Reasons Against
Less display colour count Edit
Benq GW2750 is only 16.2M display colours. That's 0.57M less than the Benq EW2750ZL ().
Slower response time Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a 4ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Benq EW2750ZL. That's 3ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports.
1.3kg heavier Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a 5.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg heavier than the Benq EW2750ZL (5.5kg) and 100g heavier than the Benq RL2755 (5.5kg).
£1 more expensive
The Benq GW2750 is more expensive than the Benq EW2750ZL by £0.01.
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over one year older
The Benq GW2750 is older than the Benq EW2750ZL by 20 months and older than the Benq RL2755 by 16 months.
24% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the running costs of the Benq GW2750 are £48.07 which is £9.28 more than the Benq RL2755. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq GW2750 has received 1 award, the Benq RL2755 has received 2 awards.
7 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable height Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 336.15mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.050000000000011mm smaller than the Benq EW2750ZL (336.15mm).
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Benq EW2750ZL and the Benq GW2750 (160°).
8° narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°, whereas the Benq EW2750ZL and the Benq GW2750 are both 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
1.2kg heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg heavier than the Benq EW2750ZL (5.5kg) and 100g lighter than the Benq GW2750 (5.5kg).
£20 more expensive
The Benq RL2755 is more expensive than the Benq EW2750ZL by £20 and more expensive than the Benq GW2750 by £19.99.
Four months older
The Benq RL2755 is older than the Benq EW2750ZL by four months.
A bit Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Benq RL2755 is 94%, whereas the average user rating of the Benq EW2750ZL is 96% (based on 11 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
PC Advisor.co.uk: Recommended
2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 39 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 72.11
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 72.11
Purchase price £ 179.98
Total cost of ownership £ 252.09
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 48.07
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 48.07
Purchase price £ 179.99
Total cost of ownership £ 228.06
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 38.79
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 38.79
Purchase price £ 199.98
Total cost of ownership £ 238.77
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.36T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 50 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 30 - 83
Viewable Height
336.2mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.15mm
Viewable Width
597.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
16.2M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 5000:1
 5000:1
BEST
 5000:1
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 4ms 1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
 Headphone out port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
Microphone in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Microphone in port
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Input Port
 Audio input port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input port
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
AC Power in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC power in port

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
4W 4W 4W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2
Integrated TV Tuner
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Adjustable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 15 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Wall Mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
OSD Language
17 17 17
On Screen Menu Display
 On screen menu display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
45W 30W 24.21W
BEST
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
BEST
 90 - 264
 90 - 264
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
 TCO
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
4.3kg
BEST
5.6kg 5.5kg
Height
458.5mm 489mm 478mm
Depth
194.9mm 191mm 213mm
Width
613.8mm 655mm 639mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 VGA
 HDMI
 VGA
 HDMI
Manual Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
28W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Video Bandwidth
205 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback