Acer G276HL vs Asus MX279H vs Benq GW2760 vs Benq RL2755

(178)
(320)
(123)
Acer G276HL
Asus MX279H
Benq GW2760
Benq RL2755

Top Prices

Transparent
Out of stock
Wild Arc
Delivery unknown
In stock
Misco
Delivery unknown
In stock (87 available)
eBay
Standard delivery: £56.60
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Box
FREE Standard delivery
Everest Technology
Delivery unknown
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Novatech
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £3.99
In stock

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Acer G276HL has a vertical viewing angle of 178° (as do the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760), but the Benq RL2755 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Acer G276HL is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (170°).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer G276HL is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Benq GW2760 and the Benq RL2755. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Asus MX279H (300 cd/m²).
39% lower power consumption when off Edit
The Acer G276HL is a 0.36W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.14W lower than the Asus MX279H () and 0.36W higher than the Benq GW2760 ().
Hugely lighter Edit
The Acer G276HL has a weight of 3.5kg, but the Asus MX279H is a 5.2kg weight PC monitor (1.7kg heavier), the Benq GW2760 is a 4.7kg weight PC monitor (1.2kg heavier) and the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (2kg heavier).
31% shorter Edit
The Acer G276HL has a height of 373.38mm. That's 67.92mm shorter than the Asus MX279H (478mm), 114.62mm shorter than the Benq GW2760 (478mm) and 104.62mm shorter than the Benq RL2755 (478mm).
Hugely shallower Edit
Acer G276HL is 40.64mm deep, but the Asus MX279H is a 225.2mm deep PC monitor (184.56mm deeper), the Benq GW2760 is a 215mm deep PC monitor (174.36mm deeper) and the Benq RL2755 is a 213mm deep PC monitor (172.36mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
The Acer G276HL has a width of 622.3mm. That's 0.30000000000007mm narrower than the Asus MX279H (639mm), 18.7mm narrower than the Benq GW2760 (639mm) and 16.7mm narrower than the Benq RL2755 (639mm).
8 Reasons For
16.77M more display colour count Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 16.77M display colours PC monitor (as does the Benq RL2755), whereas the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760 are both only unknownM display colours PC monitors (16.77M less).
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX279H has a vertical viewing angle of 178° (as do the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760), however the Benq RL2755 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (170°).
Vastly bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 68.6cm bigger than the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760 ().
One more HDMI port Edit
The Asus MX279H has two HDMI ports (as does the Benq RL2755), however the Benq GW2760 only has one HDMI port.
6W higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 6W higher than the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760 (4W) and 2W higher than the Benq RL2755 (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

51 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Nine more awards
The Asus MX279H has 10 awards from expert review sites, whereas the Benq GW2760 has 1 award and the Benq RL2755 has 2 awards.
8 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Acer G276HL and the Asus MX279H. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (160°).
Slightly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq GW2760 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178° (as do the Acer G276HL and the Asus MX279H), whereas the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq GW2760 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the Acer G276HL and the Benq RL2755), whereas the Asus MX279H is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
72% larger color gamut Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 72% color gamut PC monitor, and so does the Benq RL2755. That's 72% larger than the Acer G276HL (72%).
VESA mounting Edit
The Benq GW2760 supports VESA mounting (as does the Benq RL2755), but the Asus MX279H does not support VESA mounting.
Lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 0.3W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 0.3W higher than the Acer G276HL (0.5W) and 0.2W lower than the Asus MX279H and the Benq RL2755 (0.5W).
£12 cheaper
The Benq GW2760 is £36.61 cheaper than the Acer G276HL, £11.90 cheaper than the Asus MX279H and £51.81 cheaper than the Benq RL2755.
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 2 expert reviews, the Benq GW2760 has an average review score of 98%, whereas the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews) and the Benq RL2755 has an average rating of 75% (based on 16 reviews).
11 Reasons For
Bigger viewable height Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 336.15mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 336.15mm bigger than the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760 (336.15mm).
Vastly bigger viewable width Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a viewable width of 597.6mm, however the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760 are both only unknownmm viewable width PC monitors (597.6mm smaller).
Vastly more display colour count Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a display colour count of 16.77M, and so does the Asus MX279H. That's 16.77M more than the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760 (16.77M).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760), but the Asus MX279H is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Eleven times faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 5ms faster than the Acer G276HL (1ms), 4ms faster than the Asus MX279H (1ms) and 11ms faster than the Benq GW2760 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Larger color gamut Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 72% color gamut PC monitor, and so does the Benq GW2760. That's 72% larger than the Acer G276HL (72%).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Benq RL2755 is two, and so does the Asus MX279H, but the Benq GW2760 only has one HDMI port.
VESA mounting Edit
The Benq RL2755 supports VESA mounting (as does the Benq GW2760), however the Asus MX279H does not support VESA mounting.
£222.08 cheaper to run
The Benq RL2755 is £5.53 cheaper to run than the Acer G276HL, £20.50 cheaper to run than the Asus MX279H and £222.08 cheaper to run than the Benq GW2760 over five years. Read more
More popular
The Benq RL2755 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 2741 by sales volume in our PC monitors, but the Acer G276HL ranks No. 5115 and the Asus MX279H ranks No. 6088.
User reviews are marginally better
Based on 107 reviews, the Benq RL2755 has an average user review score of 94%, but the Acer G276HL has an average rating of 93% (based on 177 reviews), the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 89% (based on 285 reviews) and the Benq GW2760 has an average rating of 20% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
Significantly slower response time Edit
The Acer G276HL has a response time of 6ms, whereas the Asus MX279H is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster), the Benq GW2760 is a 12ms response time PC monitor (6ms slower) and the Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (5ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Acer G276HL is one (as does the Benq GW2760), but the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports.
More expensive by £37
The Acer G276HL is £24.71 more expensive than the Asus MX279H and £36.61 more expensive than the Benq GW2760.
Not as many stockists
The Acer G276HL is only stocked by 4 stores, however the Asus MX279H is stocked by 52 shops and the Benq RL2755 is stocked by 24 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by seven months
The Acer G276HL is one month older than the Benq GW2760 and seven months older than the Benq RL2755.
Higher running costs over five years by £5.53
The Acer G276HL costs £44.32 to run which is £5.53 more to run than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Acer G276HL is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 5115 by number of sales in our PC monitors, but the Benq RL2755 ranks No. 2741.
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The Acer G276HL has an average user score of 93%, but the Benq RL2755 has an average user rating of 94% (based on 107 reviews).
15 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer G276HL, the Benq GW2760 and the Benq RL2755 (300 cd/m²).
4ms slower response time Edit
The Asus MX279H has a response time of 5ms, but the Acer G276HL is a 6ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower), the Benq GW2760 is a 12ms response time PC monitor (7ms slower) and the Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The Asus MX279H does not support VESA mounting, however the Benq GW2760 and the Benq RL2755 support VESA mounting.
0.5W higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Asus MX279H has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.5W (as does the Benq RL2755), whereas the Acer G276HL is a unknownW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.5W lower) and the Benq GW2760 is a 0.3W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.2W lower).
Higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.14W higher than the Acer G276HL () and 0.5W higher than the Benq GW2760 ().
1.7kg heavier Edit
The Asus MX279H has a weight of 5.2kg, however the Acer G276HL is a 3.5kg weight PC monitor (1.7kg lighter), the Benq GW2760 is a 4.7kg weight PC monitor (500g lighter) and the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (300g heavier).
67.92mm taller Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 441.3mm tall PC monitor. That's 67.92mm taller than the Acer G276HL (478mm), 46.7mm shorter than the Benq GW2760 (478mm) and 36.7mm shorter than the Benq RL2755 (478mm).
184.56mm deeper Edit
The Asus MX279H has a depth of 225.2mm, however the Acer G276HL is a 40.64mm deep PC monitor (184.56mm shallower), the Benq GW2760 is a 215mm deep PC monitor (10.2mm shallower) and the Benq RL2755 is a 213mm deep PC monitor (12.2mm shallower).
1% wider Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 622.6mm wide PC monitor. That's 0.30000000000007mm wider than the Acer G276HL (639mm), 18.4mm narrower than the Benq GW2760 (639mm) and 16.4mm narrower than the Benq RL2755 (639mm).
More expensive by £12
The Asus MX279H is £11.90 more expensive than the Benq GW2760.
Older by over two years
The Asus MX279H is 20 months older than the Acer G276HL, 21 months older than the Benq GW2760 and two years older than the Benq RL2755.
£20.50 more expensive to run over five years
The Asus MX279H costs £59.29 to run which is £14.97 more to run than the Acer G276HL and £20.50 more to run than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Asus MX279H is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 6088 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the Acer G276HL ranks No. 5115 and the Benq RL2755 ranks No. 2741.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The Asus MX279H's average expert score is 80%, however the Benq GW2760's is 98% (based on 2 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The Asus MX279H's average user score is 89%, however the Acer G276HL's is 93% (based on 177 reviews) and the Benq RL2755's is 94% (based on 107 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 12ms response time PC monitor. That's 6ms slower than the Acer G276HL (1ms), 7ms slower than the Asus MX279H (1ms) and 11ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the Acer G276HL, whereas the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports.
Heavier Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 4.7kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg heavier than the Acer G276HL (5.5kg), 500g lighter than the Asus MX279H (5.5kg) and 800g lighter than the Benq RL2755 (5.5kg).
Taller Edit
Benq GW2760 is 488mm tall, but the Acer G276HL is a 373.38mm tall PC monitor (114.62mm shorter), the Asus MX279H is a 441.3mm tall PC monitor (46.7mm shorter) and the Benq RL2755 is a 478mm tall PC monitor (10mm shorter).
Deeper Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 215mm deep PC monitor. That's 174.36mm deeper than the Acer G276HL (213mm), 10.2mm shallower than the Asus MX279H (213mm) and 2mm deeper than the Benq RL2755 (213mm).
18.7mm wider Edit
Benq GW2760 is 641mm wide, but the Acer G276HL is a 622.3mm wide PC monitor (18.7mm narrower), the Asus MX279H is a 622.6mm wide PC monitor (18.4mm narrower) and the Benq RL2755 is a 639mm wide PC monitor (2mm narrower).
Fewer sellers
Only 1 shop sell the Benq GW2760, but 4 sellers sell the Acer G276HL, 52 shops sell the Asus MX279H and 24 sellers sell the Benq RL2755. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Six months older
The Benq GW2760 is older than the Benq RL2755 by six months.
573% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Benq GW2760 are £260.87 which is £216.55 more than the Acer G276HL, £201.58 more than the Asus MX279H and £222.08 more than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq GW2760 has received 1 award, the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards and the Benq RL2755 has received 2 awards.
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Benq GW2760 is only 20%, whereas the average user rating of the Acer G276HL is 93% (based on 177 reviews), the Asus MX279H is 89% (based on 285 reviews) and the Benq RL2755 is 94% (based on 107 reviews).
12 Reasons Against
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Acer G276HL, the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760 (160°).
Slightly narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°, but the Acer G276HL, the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760 are all 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
2W lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Benq RL2755 has an RMS rated audio power of 4W, however the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760 are both unknownW RMS rated audio power PC monitors (4W lower) and the Asus MX279H is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Vastly higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 0.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor, and so does the Asus MX279H. That's 0.5W higher than the Acer G276HL (0.5W) and 0.2W higher than the Benq GW2760 (0.5W).
Heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 2kg heavier than the Acer G276HL (5.5kg), 300g heavier than the Asus MX279H (5.5kg) and 800g heavier than the Benq GW2760 (5.5kg).
22% taller Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a height of 478mm, however the Acer G276HL is a 373.38mm tall PC monitor (104.62mm shorter), the Asus MX279H is a 441.3mm tall PC monitor (36.7mm shorter) and the Benq GW2760 is a 488mm tall PC monitor (10mm taller).
Deeper Edit
Benq RL2755 is 213mm deep. That's 172.36mm deeper than the Acer G276HL (213mm), 12.2mm shallower than the Asus MX279H (213mm) and 2mm shallower than the Benq GW2760 (213mm).
16.7mm wider Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a width of 639mm, however the Acer G276HL is a 622.3mm wide PC monitor (16.7mm narrower), the Asus MX279H is a 622.6mm wide PC monitor (16.4mm narrower) and the Benq GW2760 is a 641mm wide PC monitor (2mm wider).
£52 more expensive
The Benq RL2755 is more expensive than the Acer G276HL by £15.20, more expensive than the Asus MX279H by £39.91 and more expensive than the Benq GW2760 by £51.81.
Not as many stockists
Only 24 stores sells the Benq RL2755, however 52 sellers sell the Asus MX279H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq RL2755 has received 2 awards, the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards.
Hugely Lower expert review Score
The Benq RL2755 only has an average expert rating of 75%, but the Asus MX279H has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews) and the Benq GW2760 has an average expert rating of 98% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
ferra.ru: Recommended
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwaremx.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Silver
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
1 Award
voz.vn: Recommended
2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

30 months Ago 50 months Ago 30 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 41.34
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.98
Total running cost £ 44.32
Purchase price £ 184.78
Total cost of ownership £ 229.10
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 59.29
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 59.29
Purchase price £ 160.07
Total cost of ownership £ 219.36
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 72.11
Electricity cost - standby £ 188.76
Total running cost £ 260.87
Purchase price £ 148.17
Total cost of ownership £ 409.04
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 38.79
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 38.79
Purchase price £ 199.98
Total cost of ownership £ 238.77
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.22T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.22 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
33
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D Compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Full HD
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Full HD
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
SRGB Display Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 SRGB display feature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 336.15mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.6cm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms 5ms 12ms 1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Input Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input port
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
AC Power in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC power in port

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data Bang & Olufsen ICEpower Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W Unknown - Click to provide data 4W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
 Integrated TV tuner

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
 Ethernet LAN port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
WiFi
 WiFi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Adjustable Height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
 Adjustable height
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 20 - -5 -5 - 20 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling Base
 Swivelling base
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wall Mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
 VESA mounting
BEST
Pivoting Base
 Pivoting base
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 17 17
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
 LED indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
BEST
 B
 B
 B
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.36W
BEST
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
25.8W 37W 45W 24.21W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.49W
BEST
0.5W 31W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 MPR II
 RoHS
BEST
 MPR II
 RoHS
BEST
 MPR II
 RoHS
 MPR II
 RoHS
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 537mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 114mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 700mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
3.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
432mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth With Stand
179mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Width With Stand
623.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
3.5kg
BEST
5.2kg 4.7kg 5.5kg
Height
373.38mm
BEST
441.3mm 488mm 478mm
Depth
40.64mm
BEST
225.2mm 215mm 213mm
Width
622.3mm
BEST
622.6mm 641mm 639mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
BEST
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
BEST
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
BEST
Manual Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual included
Interface Adapters Included
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Connection to a PC
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Connection to a PC
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback