Asus VC279 vs Benq EW2750ZL

(16)
Asus VC279
Benq EW2750ZL

Top Prices

Technoworld
Delivery unknown
In stock
Laptops Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
BT Business Direct
Standard delivery: £7.40
In stock
IT-Supplier.co.uk
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Shorter Edit
Asus VC279 is 372.6mm tall, but the Benq EW2750ZL is a 458.5mm tall PC monitor (85.9mm taller).
Shallower Edit
The Asus VC279 is a 46.5mm deep PC monitor. That's 148.4mm shallower than the Benq EW2750ZL (194.9mm).
Cheaper to run by £25.48
The Asus VC279 only costs £46.63 to run over five years however the Benq EW2750ZL costs £72.11 to run (55% more). Read more
8 Reasons For
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Asus VC279 (300 cd/m²).
Faster response time Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a response time of 4ms, but the Asus VC279 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has two HDMI ports, however the Asus VC279 only has one HDMI port.
1W higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 1W higher than the Asus VC279 (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Moderately lighter Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a weight of 4.3kg, however the Asus VC279 is a 4.4kg weight PC monitor (100g heavier).
Narrower Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 613.8mm wide PC monitor. That's 8.8000000000001mm narrower than the Asus VC279 (613.8mm).
Cheaper by £23
The Benq EW2750ZL costs £23.08 less than the Asus VC279.
18 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus VC279 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², whereas the Benq EW2750ZL is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
20% slower response time Edit
The Asus VC279 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Benq EW2750ZL (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Asus VC279 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Benq EW2750ZL only has two HDMI ports.
A lot lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus VC279 has an RMS rated audio power of 3W, but the Benq EW2750ZL is a 4W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (1W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

3% heavier Edit
The Asus VC279 is a 4.4kg weight PC monitor. That's 100g heavier than the Benq EW2750ZL (4.3kg).
A little wider Edit
Asus VC279 is 622.6mm wide, but the Benq EW2750ZL is a 613.8mm wide PC monitor (8.8000000000001mm narrower).
£23 more expensive
The Asus VC279 is more expensive than the Benq EW2750ZL by £23.08.
Fewer sellers
Only 1 seller sell the Asus VC279, but 19 retailers sell the Benq EW2750ZL. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
3 Reasons Against
85.9mm taller Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 458.5mm tall PC monitor. That's 85.9mm taller than the Asus VC279 (458.5mm).
Vastly deeper Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a depth of 194.9mm, however the Asus VC279 is a 46.5mm deep PC monitor (148.4mm shallower).
Higher running costs over five years by £25.48
Over five years the running costs of the Benq EW2750ZL are £72.11 which is £25.48 more than the Asus VC279. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 46.63
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 46.63
Purchase price £ 199.23
Total cost of ownership £ 245.86
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 72.11
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 72.11
Purchase price £ 176.15
Total cost of ownership £ 248.26
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.23T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.36T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.2mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
68.6cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms 4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
Audio Input Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input port
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
3W 4W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2
Built-In Subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in subwoofer

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN Port
 Ethernet LAN port
Unknown - Click to provide data
WiFi
 WiFi
Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 17
On Screen Menu Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen menu display
LED Indicator
 LED indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W
Typical Power Consumption
29.1W
BEST
45W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
 Energy Star certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.4kg 5.9kg
BEST
Packaging Height
512mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
164mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
692mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
442mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth With Stand
200mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width With Stand
622.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
4.4kg 4.3kg
BEST
Height
372.6mm
BEST
458.5mm
Depth
46.5mm
BEST
194.9mm
Width
622.6mm 613.8mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Included
 DVI
 AC
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 VGA
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 28W
Maximum Video Bandwidth
Unknown - Click to provide data 205
Feedback