A few customers who purchased it thought it was good value for money. J. Clark said in their review of this PC monitors “The movie watching experience cannot be rivalled in this range and at this price it's about as good as it gets for gaming immersion”. John Sealey wrote in his review of this PC monitors two years ago “Good value and looks good”. Mark Twain gave it a rating of 4 stars and he mentioned on Amazon also two years ago “For the money I am happy” in his review of the AOC Q2963PM.
Three people said in their reviews that it was a bargain for the price. Anthro wrote “Edge of screen is a little cheap and weak.”. Jen mentioned on Amazon “Verdict 1 star too generousBadly madetemperamental3 failed units in a row within 1 1/2 monthssome parts shoddy cheap plasticPlease spare yourself the headache” in her review of this PC monitors but in spite of that gave it a rating of 20 out of 100. Two years ago Simon Scarlett said in his AOC Q2963PM review “I was a bit apprehensive at first due to the cost (so cheap” and scored it 99 out of 100.
One person who reviewed it mentioned that it was cheap. Three years ago Hexus.net said in their review of this PC monitors on HEXUS.net “Gamers understand that modern graphics cards are able to play the latest games at resolutions way above the standard 1,920x1,080 (1080p) available on a wide range of inexpensive monitors”.