Some people who purchased it concluded that it was good value for money. Two years ago J. Clark wrote on Amazon “The movie watching experience cannot be rivalled in this range and at this price it's about as good as it gets for gaming immersion” in their review of the AOC Q2963PM. Also two years ago John Sealey said on Amazon “Good value and looks good” in his review and gave it a score of 4 stars. Mark Twain scored the AOC Q2963PM 4 stars and he mentioned “For the money I am happy”.
Some people mentioned in their reviews that it was a bargain for the price. Anthro wrote “Edge of screen is a little cheap and weak.”. Jen said on Amazon “Verdict 1 star too generousBadly madetemperamental3 failed units in a row within 1 1/2 monthssome parts shoddy cheap plasticPlease spare yourself the headache”. Two years ago Simon Scarlett mentioned on Amazon “I was a bit apprehensive at first due to the cost (so cheap” and gave the product a rating of 5 stars.
One person who purchased this PC monitor concluded that it was cheap. Hexus.net wrote on expert review site HEXUS.net three years ago “Gamers understand that modern graphics cards are able to play the latest games at resolutions way above the standard 1,920x1,080 (1080p) available on a wide range of inexpensive monitors” in their review of this PC monitor.