Close

Loading image...
Neovo RX-24

Neovo RX-24 PC Monitor

23.6" 1920 X 1080 LCD Jul 2012
Screen Size Display Resolution Display Type Built-In Speaker Release Date
- LED-backlit technology with high FHD 1920 x 1080 resolution- NeoV Optical Glass- Anti-Burn-in technology- AIP technology: PIP and PBP functions; 3D Comb Filter/Deinterlace/Noise Reduction; Image... More
A+
£46.30 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Prices will go up £76
within 2 weeks. 87% confidence. Chart
Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Computers Deal
£457.49
Out of stock
Go to Store
Cherrywood AV
£457.66
Delivery unknown
In stock
Go to Store
BT Shop
Neovo RX-24 from BT Shop
£464.00
Out of stock
Go to Store
BT Business Direct
Neovo RX-24 from BT Business Direct
£464.00
Out of stock
Go to Store
Tesco
£473.19
Delivery unknown
In stock
Go to Store
zippytom
£588.44
Out of stock
Go to Store
Report an incorrect price Found it cheaper elsewhere?
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

6 Reasons For

Has a Built-In Speaker

The Neovo RX-24 has a built-in speaker, unlike most of the other PC monitors of a comparable age and spec to the RX-24 which do not have a built-in speaker.

It may also be worth also looking at one of the other flatpanel monitors with a built-in speaker currently available including the 288P6LJEB[pl_3020740_price], or the 298P4[pl_1608300_price] both from Philips or the LG 34UM65[plb_2272549_price] which has better reviews.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Fairly Bright Display Brightness

The display brightness of PC screens of this age and type range from 30 cd/m² to 1,700 cd/m². With a display brightness of 300 candellas per square meter, the Neovo RX-24 has a fairly bright display brightness compared to most of the other similar spec PC monitors that have been around for a comparable time to the RX-24.

Chart Edit

Two BNC Input Ports

Most LCD screens that have been on the market for a comparable time to the RX-24 have between one and four BNC input ports, including the Neovo RX-24 which has two BNC input ports.

Chart Edit

1920 X 1080 (HD 1080) Graphics Resolution

This PC screen has a graphics resolution of 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), which is the most commonly found graphics resolution on PC monitors of a similar spec and age to it.

Chart Edit

Very Fast Response Time

The response times of LCD screens that are a similar age to the RX-24 range from 1ms to 40ms. With a response time of only 3 milliseconds, the Neovo RX-24 has one of the faster response times amongst similar spec PC displays of this age.

Chart Edit

Very Low Annual Energy Consumption

At only 27 kilowatt hours, the Neovo RX-24 has a quite low annual energy consumption compared to most of the other PC displays of this type and age. The annual energy consumptions of LCD screens that were released more than two years ago range from 0.02kWh to 29,000kWh, and the average annual energy consumption is 250kWh.

Chart Edit

11 Reasons Against

Not Cheap

The cheapeast PC displays of a similar type and age that we found costs £51 and the most expensive costs £5,421. We think that this PC screen looks expensive for a similar spec flatpanel monitor that has been available for more than two years.

Not 3D Compatible

The Neovo RX-24 is not 3D compatible, although it is worth noting that most of the other medium monitors that have been around for a comparable time to the RX-24 are also not 3D compatible.

PC screens which are 3D compatible that might also be worth considering include the Philips 272G5DYEB[plb_3175233_price], or the Acer DA220[plb_1606986_price]; or the Samsung SMT-2232[plb_1414672_price].

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

Most PC displays of this age and type do not have a built-in camera. The Neovo RX-24 is no exception to this as it too does not have a built-in camera.

It is worth also looking at alternative LCD screens which also have a built-in camera including the Acer DA220[plb_1606986_price], or the Philips 272P4[plb_1489468_price]; or the Philips C272P4QPKEW[plb_3027868_price].

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have an Integrated Card Reader

Most medium monitors that have been on the market for a comparable time to the RX-24 do not have an integrated card reader. The Neovo RX-24 is no exception to this as it too does not have an integrated card reader.

Other PC screens which also have an integrated card reader that you might want to look at include the DELL UP2414Q[plb_2251567_price], the Benq BL3201[plb_2558150_price], or the Acer DA220[plb_1606986_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Only HD HD Type

This PC display has a Full HD HD type, which is the most frequently found HD type on PC displays that came out more than two years ago.

Chart Edit

Very Low RMS Rated Audio Power

Across all the medium monitors that are a similar age to the RX-24 the RMS rated audio powers range from 0.5W to 49W, and the average RMS rated audio power is 5.2W. With an RMS rated audio power of only 2 Watts, the Neovo RX-24 has one of the lower RMS rated audio powers amongst flatpanel monitors of this age.

Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Vertical Viewing Angle

With a vertical viewing angle of only 160 degrees, the Neovo RX-24 has one of the narrower vertical viewing angles amongst PC monitors of this age. The narrowest vertical viewing angle of PC displays of a similar spec and age to the RX-24 is 50°, the widest is 180°, and the average vertical viewing angle is 170°.

Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Horizontal Viewing Angle

The narrowest horizontal viewing angle of flatpanel monitors of a similar type and age to the RX-24 is 60° and the widest is 1,800°. With a horizontal viewing angle of only 170 degrees, the Neovo RX-24 has a quite narrow horizontal viewing angle compared to most of the other medium monitors that were launched around the same time as the RX-24.

Chart Edit

Only One HDMI Port

The Neovo RX-24 is a one HDMI port LCD screen.

Chart Edit

Quite Few Display Colour Count

When compared to other LCD screens of this age and spec that we have checked the display colour count of, the Neovo RX-24's display colour count of only 16.2 million is one of the least. The display colour counts of PC screens of a comparable type and age to the RX-24 range from 0.21M to 1,100M.

Chart Edit

Heavy

With a weight of 7.9 kilograms, the Neovo RX-24 is one of the heavier medium monitors that were released more than two years ago amongst PC monitors of this age. Across all the similar spec PC screens that were released more than two years ago the weights range from 3g to 39kg, and the average weight is 4.9kg.

Chart Edit

5 Other reasons to consider the Neovo RX-24

Running Costs Are OK

The energy efficiency classification of this PC screen is A+. Based on average energy prices we estimate that the RX-24 will cost £47 over 5 years to run, which is typical compared to the other 998 flatpanel monitors of this age and type.

Released Over Four Years Ago

It was over four years ago when this medium monitor was released.

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This PC monitor has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is typical of many LCD screens that have been on the market for around the same time as it.

Chart Edit

LCD Display Type

The Neovo RX-24 has a better display type than most PC displays of this type and age. This PC display has an LCD display type, whereas most PC displays that have been on the market for around the same time as it have an LED display type.

We compared all the other LCD screens that have an LCD Display to this LCD screen and we think the DELL U2410[plb_1448035_price], the Philips 272P4[plb_1489468_price], and the iiyama XB2776QS[plb_1490325_price] which has better reviews is also worth considering.

If the display type of this PC monitor is not good enough for you then you might want to look at the LG 32LS33[plb_2362891_price] (LED and cheaper) or the Asus PB279[plb_2524515_price] (LED and higher rated).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Average Width

With a width of 562 millimeters, the Neovo RX-24 has a pretty typical width compared to most of the other medium monitors that are a similar age to the RX-24.

Chart Edit

Specification

User Ratings
Display
Screen Size
Display Resolution
Display Type
3D Compatible
Graphics Resolution
Backlight Type
HD Type
HDCP
Digital Vertical Frequency
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Aspect Ratio
Vertical Scan Range
Horizontal Scan Range
Pixel Pitch
Vertical Viewing Angle
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Typical Contrast Ratio
Display Brightness
Response Time
Native Aspect Ratio
Supported Number of Colours Display
Ports & Interfaces
BNC Input Port
Common Interface Technology (CI)
DC-In Jack
PC Audio in
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
Headphone Output
S-Video Input Port
HDMI Port
DVI-D Port
VGA (D-Sub) Port
DVI Port
Multimedia
Built-In Speaker
Built-In Camera
RMS Rated Audio Power
Loudspeaker
Integrated TV Tuner
Design
Case Colour
Performance
Thin Client
Thin Client Installed
Networking
Ethernet LAN Port
WiFi
Ergonomics
Picture-in-Picture Mode
Electronic Programme Guide
Adjustable Height
VESA Mount Interface
Cable Lock Slot
VESA Mounting
Power
Energy Efficiency Class
Typical Power Consumption
Standby Power Consumption
Annual Energy Consumption
AC Input Frequency
AC Input Voltage
Operational Conditions
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Storage Temperature Range
Operating Temperature Range
Camera
Technical Details
Certificates
Certification
Weight & Dimensions
Package Weight
Packaging Height
Packaging Depth
Packaging Width
Weight
Height
Depth
Width
Packaging Content
Quick Start Guide
Cable Included
Operating System/software
Other Features

Brochures and Manuals

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £43.26
Electricity cost when on standby £3.04
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £46.30
Running costs for this PC monitor have been estimated based on other similar PC monitors. If you know how much electricity and water the Neovo RX-24uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Energy Rating
0.23T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 6 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

+- Manufacturer's Description

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers neovo rx24, neovo rx24b, neovo rx24bl, neovo rx24bla, ag neovo rx24, ag neovo rx24b, neovo rx24blac, ag neovo rx24w, neovo rx24black, ag neovo rx24wh, ag neovo rx24whi, ag neovo b41zzs00, ag neovo b41zza00, ag neovo rx24whit, ag neovo rx24white, ag neovo 1920x1080
Barcodes 00813086002529, 00813086002604, 04710739591965, 04710739592047

Save Money with These Great PC Monitor Vouchers & Offers

20% Off
Voucher
20% OFF First Order
Valid 10 Oct 16 - 31 Jan 17
8% Off
Voucher
GearBest Consumer Electronics Coupon_ 8% OFF
Valid 6 Aug 16 - 31 Dec 16
Free Next Day Delivery
Voucher
Free next day delivery on all orders over £100
Valid 1 Dec 16 - 31 Dec 16
£20 Off
Voucher
£20 Off a £200+ spend
Valid 1 Nov 16 - 31 Jan 17

See How Other PC Monitors Compare to the Neovo RX-24

HP Z Display Z24 vs Neovo RX-24

HP Z Display Z24 vs Neovo RX-24
HP Z Display Z24 Neovo RX-24
£ 425.00 £457.66
Significantly Shallower
Better HD Type
1920 X 1200 Pixels Display Resolution
1920 X 1200 (WUXGA) Graphics Resolutions
Vastly Slower Response Time
Worse Energy Efficiency Rating

DELL U2713H vs Neovo RX-24

DELL U2713H vs Neovo RX-24
DELL U2713H Neovo RX-24
£ 371.00 £457.66
2x Shallower
Better Display Type
Newer by One Year
A Lot Lighter
Significantly Slower Response Time
Only HD Ready HD Type

NEC MultiSync PA242 vs Neovo RX-24

NEC MultiSync PA242 vs Neovo RX-24
NEC MultiSync PA242 Neovo RX-24
£ 756.00 £457.66
More Display Colour Count
Shallower
Better Display Type
More Display Resolution
94% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Slower Response Time
Feedback