LG 55UF770 vs LG 55UF850 vs LG 55UG870 vs Panasonic TX-55CX700

(8)
(25)
LG 55UF770
LG 55UF850
LG 55UG870
Panasonic TX-55CX700

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Electrical Experience
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
ao
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Electronic Empire
Delivery unknown
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £16.39
In stock
Dealbuyer.com
Out of stock
RLR Distribution
Out of stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £500.00
In stock
RLR Distribution
Out of stock
Electronics & Gadgets Direct
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Available from 20 shops
A greater number of stores increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
More popular
The LG 55UF770 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 62285 by sales volume in our TVs, however the LG 55UF850 ranks No. 143902 and the LG 55UG870 ranks No. 77611.
Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+", however the rating of the LG 55UF850 is "A+", the rating of the LG 55UG870 is "A+" and the rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is "B".
Expert reviews are vastly better
The LG 55UF770 has an average expert review score of 100% based on 1 review, however the LG 55UF850 has an average rating of 76% (based on 17 reviews) and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 has an average rating of 80% (based on 1 review).
5 Reasons For
53% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 6kWh lower than the LG 55UF770 and the LG 55UG870 (179kWh) and 62kWh lower than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (179kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Significantly thinner Edit
The LG 55UF850 is a 50.8mm thick TV, whereas the LG 55UF770 is a 56.7mm thick TV (5.9mm thicker), the LG 55UG870 is a 98mm thick TV (47.2mm thicker) and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is a 54mm thick TV (3.2mm thicker). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

£121 cheaper
The LG 55UF850 costs £498.50, whereas the LG 55UF770 is £619.00, the LG 55UG870 is £1,529.45 and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is £1,194.79.
£79.73 cheaper to run
The LG 55UF850 is £6.41 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF770, £6.41 cheaper to run than the LG 55UG870 and £79.73 cheaper to run than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 over five years. Read more
Higher energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UF850 is "A+", but the rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+", the rating of the LG 55UG870 is "A+" and the rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is "B".
2 Reasons For
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The LG 55UG870 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the LG 55UF770 has a rating of "A+", the LG 55UF850 has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a rating of "B".
Better user reviews
Based on 1 user review, the average review score of the LG 55UG870 is 100%, whereas the average rating of the LG 55UF770 is 86% (based on 7 reviews) and the average rating of the LG 55UF850 is 95% (based on 8 reviews).
2 Reasons For
600Hz faster refresh rate Edit
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a refresh rate of 800Hz, but the LG 55UF850 and the LG 55UG870 are both only 200Hz refresh rate TVs (600Hz slower). Read more

The refresh rate is also known as the high frequency rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. The high frequency rate is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

The high frequency rate is also known as the refresh rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate.

21% lighter Edit
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a weight of 18kg, however the LG 55UF850 is a 20.4kg heavy TV (2.4kg heavier) and the LG 55UG870 is a 21.7kg heavy TV (3.7kg heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF770 is a 123kWh annual energy consumption TV, and so does the LG 55UG870. That's 6kWh higher than the LG 55UF850 (179kWh) and 56kWh lower than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (179kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Thicker Edit
LG 55UF770 is 56.7mm thick, but the LG 55UF850 is a 50.8mm thick TV (5.9mm thinner), the LG 55UG870 is a 98mm thick TV (41.3mm thicker) and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is a 54mm thick TV (2.7mm thinner). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

£121 more expensive
The LG 55UF770 is more expensive than the LG 55UF850 by £120.50.
More expensive to run over five years by 5%
The running costs of the LG 55UF770 are £136.43 which is £6.41 more than the LG 55UF850 over five years. Show assumptions.
A lot Lower user review Score
The LG 55UF770's average user rating is 86%, however the LG 55UF850's is 95% (based on 8 reviews) and the LG 55UG870's is 100% (based on 1 review).
7 Reasons Against
Slower refresh rate Edit
The LG 55UF850 is a 200Hz refresh rate TV, and so does the LG 55UG870. That's 600Hz slower than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (800Hz). Read more

The refresh rate is also known as the high frequency rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. The high frequency rate is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

The high frequency rate is also known as the refresh rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate.

12% heavier Edit
The LG 55UF850 has a weight of 20.4kg. That's 1.3kg lighter than the LG 55UG870 (18kg) and 2.4kg heavier than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (18kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Not as many stockists
Only 3 retailers sells the LG 55UF850, however 21 sellers sell the LG 55UF770. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
One month older
The LG 55UF850 is older than the LG 55UF770 by one month. The LG 55UF850 is the same age as the LG 55UG870 and the Panasonic TX-55CX700.
Worse selling
The LG 55UF850 ranks No. 143902 by sales volume, but the LG 55UF770 ranks No. 62285 and the LG 55UG870 ranks No. 77611.
Hugely Lower expert review Score
The LG 55UF850 only has an average expert rating of 76%, but the LG 55UF770 has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 1 review) and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 1 review).
Lower user review Score
The LG 55UF850 has an average user rating of 95%, but the LG 55UG870 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
9 Reasons Against
600Hz slower refresh rate Edit
The LG 55UG870 has a refresh rate of 200Hz (as does the LG 55UF850), whereas the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is an 800Hz refresh rate TV (600Hz faster). Read more

The refresh rate is also known as the high frequency rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. The high frequency rate is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

The high frequency rate is also known as the refresh rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate.

A bit higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UG870 has an annual energy consumption of 123kWh (as does the LG 55UF770), whereas the LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV (6kWh lower) and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is a 179kWh annual energy consumption TV (56kWh higher). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Thicker Edit
The LG 55UG870 has a thickness of 98mm. That's 41.3mm thicker than the LG 55UF770 (54mm), 47.2mm thicker than the LG 55UF850 (54mm) and 44mm thicker than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (54mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Heavier Edit
LG 55UG870 is 21.7kg heavy, but the LG 55UF850 is a 20.4kg heavy TV (1.3kg lighter) and the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is an 18kg heavy TV (3.7kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

More expensive by £1,031
The LG 55UG870 is £910.45 more expensive than the LG 55UF770, £1,030.95 more expensive than the LG 55UF850 and £334.66 more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX700.
Fewer sellers
The LG 55UG870 is only stocked by 2 stores, but the LG 55UF770 is stocked by 21 retailers and the LG 55UF850 is stocked by 3 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by one month
The LG 55UG870 is one month older than the LG 55UF770. The LG 55UG870 is the same age as the LG 55UF850 and the Panasonic TX-55CX700.
£6.41 more expensive to run over five years
The LG 55UG870 costs £136.43 to run which is £6.41 more to run than the LG 55UF850 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The LG 55UG870 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 77611 by number of sales in our TVs, whereas the LG 55UF770 ranks No. 62285.
8 Reasons Against
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has an annual energy consumption of 179kWh, but the LG 55UF770 and the LG 55UG870 are both 123kWh annual energy consumption TVs (56kWh lower) and the LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV (62kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Thicker Edit
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is a 54mm thick TV. That's 2.7mm thinner than the LG 55UF770 (54mm), 3.2mm thicker than the LG 55UF850 (54mm) and 44mm thinner than the LG 55UG870 (54mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

More expensive by £696
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is £575.79 more expensive than the LG 55UF770 and £696.29 more expensive than the LG 55UF850.
Not as many stockists
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is only stocked by 1 retailer, however the LG 55UF770 is stocked by 21 retailers, the LG 55UF850 is stocked by 3 stores and the LG 55UG870 is stocked by 2 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
Older by one month
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is one month older than the LG 55UF770. The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is the same age as the LG 55UF850 and the LG 55UG870.
£79.73 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the Panasonic TX-55CX700 costs £209.75 to run which is £73.32 more to run than the LG 55UF770, £79.73 more to run than the LG 55UF850 and £73.32 more to run than the LG 55UG870. Show assumptions.
Inferior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is "B", but the rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+", the rating of the LG 55UF850 is "A+" and the rating of the LG 55UG870 is "A+".
Expert review Rating is hugely Worse
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has an average expert score of 80%, but the LG 55UF770 has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 1 review).

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
avforums.com: Recommended
Expert Reviews: Recommended
No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 21 months Ago 21 months Ago 21 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 134.60
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 136.43
Purchase price £ 619.00
Total cost of ownership £ 755.43
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 128.19
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 130.02
Purchase price £ 498.50
Total cost of ownership £ 628.52
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 134.60
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 136.43
Purchase price £ 1,529.45
Total cost of ownership £ 1,665.88
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 206.71
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 209.75
Purchase price £ 1,194.79
Total cost of ownership £ 1,404.54
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.68T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.68 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.65T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.68T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.68 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.0T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 1.0 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
27
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
55" 55" 55" 55"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
3D Compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 200Hz 200Hz 800Hz
BEST
3D Type
 Passive
 Passive
 Passive
 Passive
LED Backlighting
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
OLED Technology
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 OLED technology
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 800Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast
BEST
Video Mode
 2160p
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
BEST
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
3D Technology
 LG Cinema 3D
 LG Cinema 3D
 LG Cinema 3D
 LG Cinema 3D
2D-3D Converter
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 2D-3D converter
Unknown - Click to provide data
Picture Mastering Index (PMI)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2,000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Dynamic Contrast Ratio (marketing Name)
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm 139cm
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 176°
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 176°
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
 LED
BEST
 LED

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
Internet Browser
 Internet browser
 Internet browser
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
Timeshift Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Timeshift feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
Video App
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
Operating System Version
2.0 Unknown - Click to provide data 2.0 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 20W 20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2 2
Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Dolby Technology
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital Plus
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital Plus
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital Plus
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital Plus
Sound Mode
 News
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 News
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 News
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 News
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
AptX Audio Decoding
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AptX audio decoding
Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Decoding Technology
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Plus

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 1 1 1
Common Interface Plus
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
Common Interface Connection
 Common interface connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface connection
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1 1 1
RF Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
SCART Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
PC Audio in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio in port
Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Component Video in Port
1 1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
2 2 2 2
USB 3.0 Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
 DVI port
 DVI port
 DVI port
 DVI port
HDCP Security Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP security feature
HDMI Version
 2.0
 2.0
BEST
 2.0
 2.0
PC in Port
 PC in port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC in port
HDMI Port
3 3 3 3
Intel Wireless Display Technology
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Intel Wireless Display technology
Unknown - Click to provide data
Consumer Electronics Control
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile high-definition link
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Return Channel (ARC)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio Return Channel (ARC)
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
1 1 1 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
Internet Browser
 Internet browser
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
WLAN-Ready Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 WLAN-ready connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth connection
 Bluetooth connection
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
Unknown - Click to provide data
WiFi Direct Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 WiFi direct connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
Network Browsing
 Network browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Network browsing

Management Features

Smart Mode
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Dynamic
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Dynamic
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Dynamic
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Dynamic
On Screen Display
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen display
Electronic Programme Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Electronic programme guide
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display Language
 ENG
 ENG
 ENG
 ENG
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 26
Picture and Text Management
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture and text management
Hotel Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Hotel mode

Performance

Memory Card
 SD
 SD
 SD
 SD
Integrated Card Reader
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated card reader
Video Format
 DIVX
 H.265
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
 DIVX
 H.265
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
 DIVX
 H.265
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
 DIVX
 H.265
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
Audio Format
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 DTS
 WAV
 RTX
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 DTS
 WAV
 RTX
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 DTS
 WAV
 RTX
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 DTS
 WAV
 RTX
Image Format
 JPG
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG
 MPO
 JPS
Teletext Function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
24p Playback
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 24p playback
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Video Recorder
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Digital video recorder
 Digital video recorder
Unknown - Click to provide data
Local Dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Local dimming
Ambient Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ambient light sensor
Voice Control
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Voice control
Stored Teletext Page
Unknown - Click to provide data 2,000 pages
BEST
2,000 pages
BEST
1,500 pages
Subtitles Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Subtitles function
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

LED Indicator
 LED indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Peak Luminance Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 65% Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Power

Typical Power Consumption
84W 80W
BEST
84W 129W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
BEST
 A+
BEST
 A+
BEST
 A+
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 129W
Annual Energy Consumption
123kWh 117kWh
BEST
123kWh 179kWh
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
 50
Input Voltage
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 200 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 200 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 200 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 200 - 240

Certificates

DLNA Certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
56.7mm 50.8mm
BEST
98mm 54mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 20.4kg 21.7kg 18kg
BEST
Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 25.9kg 29.7kg 24kg
BEST
Weight (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 24.2kg 19kg
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
261mm 260.6mm 236mm
BEST
242mm
Height (with Stand)
778mm 782mm 773mm 762mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,240mm 1,234mm
BEST
1,241mm 1,237mm
Height
722mm 727mm 723mm 717mm
BEST
Width
1,240mm 1,234mm
BEST
1,241mm 1,237mm
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 813mm
BEST
837mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1,360mm
BEST
1,615mm

Packaging Content

Included 3D Glasses
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Included 3D glasses
Unknown - Click to provide data
Handheld Remote Control
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Handheld remote control
Feedback