LG 55UF850 vs Panasonic TX-55CX700

(25)
LG 55UF850
Panasonic TX-55CX700

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £16.39
In stock
Dealbuyer.com
Out of stock
RLR Distribution
Out of stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £3.99
In stock
Electronics & Gadgets Direct
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 62kWh lower than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (179kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

3.2mm thinner Edit
The LG 55UF850 has a thickness of 50.8mm, however the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is a 54mm thick TV (3.2mm thicker). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
More popular
The LG 55UF850 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 147782 by sales volume in our TVs, whereas the Panasonic TX-55CX700 ranks No. 360948.
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UF850 is "A+", whereas the rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is "B".
4 Reasons For
Significantly faster refresh rate Edit
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a refresh rate of 800Hz, whereas the LG 55UF850 is only a 200Hz refresh rate TV (600Hz slower). Read more

The refresh rate is also known as the high frequency rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. The high frequency rate is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

The high frequency rate is also known as the refresh rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate.

400g lighter Edit
Panasonic TX-55CX700 is 20kg heavy, but the LG 55UF850 is a 20.4kg heavy TV (400g heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Cheaper by £455
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is £455 cheaper than the LG 55UF850.
Slightly better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is 80%, whereas the average rating of the LG 55UF850 is 76% (based on 17 reviews).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Slower refresh rate Edit
The LG 55UF850 is a 200Hz refresh rate TV. That's 600Hz slower than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (800Hz). Read more

The refresh rate is also known as the high frequency rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. The high frequency rate is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. A TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

The high frequency rate is also known as the refresh rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate.

Heavier Edit
LG 55UF850 is 20.4kg heavy. That's 400g heavier than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (20kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

£455 more expensive
The LG 55UF850 is more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 by £455.
A bit Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the LG 55UF850 is only 76%, whereas the average expert rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is 80% (based on 1 review).
5 Reasons Against
62kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has an annual energy consumption of 179kWh, whereas the LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV (62kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

6% thicker Edit
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a thickness of 54mm. That's 3.2mm thicker than the LG 55UF850 (54mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Fewer sellers
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is only stocked by 2 sellers, but the LG 55UF850 is stocked by 3 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Less popular
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 360948 by number of sales in our TVs, whereas the LG 55UF850 ranks No. 147782.
Worse energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is "B", whereas the rating of the LG 55UF850 is "A+".

Awards

2 Awards
avforums.com: Recommended
Expert Reviews: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 21 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 128.19
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 130.02
Purchase price £ 945.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,075.02
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.65T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
55" 55"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Refresh Rate
200Hz 800Hz
BEST
3D Type
 Passive
 Passive
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 800Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 IFC (Intelligent Frame Creation)
 IFC (Intelligent Frame Creation)
Video Mode
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
3D Technology
 LG Cinema 3D
 LG Cinema 3D
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 176°
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 176°

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
Unknown - Click to provide data
Internet Browser
 Internet browser
 Internet browser
Video App
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2
Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Sound Mode
 Standard
 Music
 Standard
 Music
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 Dolby Digital
Audio Decoding Technology
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Plus

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 1
Common Interface Plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1
SCART Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1
Composite Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Component Video in Port
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
2 2
USB 3.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
 DVI port
 DVI port
HDCP Security Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP security feature
HDMI Version
 2.0
BEST
 2.0
PC in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC in port
HDMI Port
3 3
Consumer Electronics Control
 VIERA Link
 VIERA Link
Mobile High-Definition Link
 Mobile high-definition link
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
1 1

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
Bluetooth Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth connection
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Miracast
 Miracast
Unknown - Click to provide data
Network Browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Network browsing

Management Features

On Screen Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen display
Electronic Programme Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Electronic programme guide
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 26
Picture and Text Management
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture and text management

Performance

Memory Card
 SD
 SD
Integrated Card Reader
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Integrated card reader
Video Format
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
Audio Format
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
Image Format
 JPG
 MPO
 JPG
 MPO
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Digital Video Recorder
 Digital video recorder
Unknown - Click to provide data
Local Dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Local dimming
Ambient Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ambient light sensor
Voice Control
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Voice control
Stored Teletext Page
2,000 pages
BEST
1,500 pages

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Typical Power Consumption
80W Unknown - Click to provide data
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
BEST
 A+
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 129W
Annual Energy Consumption
117kWh
BEST
179kWh
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
Input Voltage
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240

Certificates

DLNA Certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
50.8mm
BEST
54mm
Weight
20.4kg 20kg
BEST
Package Weight
25.9kg
BEST
27kg
Weight (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 21kg
Depth (with Stand)
260.6mm 242mm
BEST
Height (with Stand)
782mm 762mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,234mm
BEST
1,237mm
Height
727mm 717mm
BEST
Width
1,234mm
BEST
1,237mm
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 837mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,615mm

Packaging Content

Handheld Remote Control
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Handheld remote control
Feedback