LG 55UF680 vs LG 55UF695 vs LG 55UF770

(12)
(8)
LG 55UF680
LG 55UF695
LG 55UF770

Top Prices

RLR Distribution
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (19 available)
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.00
In stock
PC World Business
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Electrical Experience
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Electronic Empire
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF680 is a 120kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 20kWh lower than the LG 55UF695 (123kWh) and 3kWh lower than the LG 55UF770 (123kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

16% lighter Edit
The LG 55UF680 has a weight of 17.8kg. That's 2.7kg lighter than the LG 55UF695 (). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

£22.43 cheaper to run
The LG 55UF680 is £22.43 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF695 and £3.20 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF770 over five years. Read more
Higher energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UF680 is "A+", but the rating of the LG 55UF695 is "A" and the rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+".
4 Reasons For
Two more USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 55UF695 is three, but the LG 55UF680 only has one USB 2.0 port and the LG 55UF770 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Three HDMI ports Edit
The LG 55UF695 is a three HDMI port TV, and so does the LG 55UF770, whereas the LG 55UF680 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

Thinner Edit
The LG 55UF695 has a thickness of 37.8mm. That's 18.9mm thinner than the LG 55UF680 and the LG 55UF770 (56.7mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Much better user reviews
Based on 11 user reviews, the average review score of the LG 55UF695 is 98%, whereas the average rating of the LG 55UF770 is 86% (based on 7 reviews).
5 Reasons For
Three HDMI ports Edit
The LG 55UF770 is a three HDMI port TV, and so does the LG 55UF695, whereas the LG 55UF680 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

Cheaper by £100
The LG 55UF770 is £100 cheaper than the LG 55UF695.
17 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Better selling
The LG 55UF770 ranks No. 64153 by number of sales, whereas the LG 55UF695 ranks No. 82681.
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The LG 55UF770 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the LG 55UF680 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 55UF695 has a rating of "A".

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Only one USB 2.0 port Edit
The LG 55UF680 has one USB 2.0 port, however the LG 55UF695 only has three USB 2.0 ports and the LG 55UF770 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the LG 55UF680 is two, but the LG 55UF770 only has three HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

A lot thicker Edit
The LG 55UF680 is a 56.7mm thick TV (as does the LG 55UF770), whereas the LG 55UF695 is a 37.8mm thick TV (18.9mm thinner). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Not as many stockists
Only 1 seller sell the LG 55UF680, however 9 shops sell the LG 55UF695 and 18 retailers sell the LG 55UF770. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
One month older
The LG 55UF680 is older than the LG 55UF770 by one month. The LG 55UF680 is the same age as the LG 55UF695.
8 Reasons Against
20kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF695 has an annual energy consumption of 140kWh, whereas the LG 55UF680 is a 120kWh annual energy consumption TV (20kWh lower) and the LG 55UF770 is a 123kWh annual energy consumption TV (17kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Heavier Edit
LG 55UF695 is 20.5kg heavy, but the LG 55UF680 is a 17.8kg heavy TV (2.7kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

More expensive by £100
The LG 55UF695 is £100 more expensive than the LG 55UF770.
Fewer sellers
The LG 55UF695 is only stocked by 9 sellers, but the LG 55UF770 is stocked by 18 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by one month
The LG 55UF695 is one month older than the LG 55UF770. The LG 55UF695 is the same age as the LG 55UF680.
£22.43 more expensive to run over five years
The LG 55UF695 costs £155.66 to run which is £22.43 more to run than the LG 55UF680 and £19.23 more to run than the LG 55UF770 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The LG 55UF695 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 82681 by number of sales in our TVs, whereas the LG 55UF770 ranks No. 64153.
Worse energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UF695 is "A", whereas the rating of the LG 55UF680 is "A+" and the rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+".
5 Reasons Against
One less USB 2.0 port Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 55UF770 is two, but the LG 55UF695 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

3kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF770 has an annual energy consumption of 123kWh, whereas the LG 55UF680 is a 120kWh annual energy consumption TV (3kWh lower) and the LG 55UF695 is a 140kWh annual energy consumption TV (17kWh higher). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

34% thicker Edit
The LG 55UF770 has a thickness of 56.7mm, and so does the LG 55UF680. That's 18.9mm thicker than the LG 55UF695 (56.7mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Higher running costs over five years by £3.20
Over five years the LG 55UF770 costs £136.43 to run which is £3.20 more to run than the LG 55UF680. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is considerably Worse
The average user rating of the LG 55UF770 is 86%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 55UF695 is 98% (based on 11 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 21 months Ago 21 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 131.40
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 133.23
Electricity cost - switched on £ 153.83
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 155.66
Purchase price £ 699.00
Total cost of ownership £ 854.66
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 134.60
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 136.43
Purchase price £ 599.00
Total cost of ownership £ 735.43
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.66T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.66 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.77T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.77 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.68T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.68 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
55" 55" 55"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Backlighting
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Technology
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
Picture Mastering Index (PMI)
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,200 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
BEST
 LED
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
Internet Browser
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
Operating System Version
2.0 4.5 2.0
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS

Audio

RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 20W 20W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2
Built-In Speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Dolby Technology
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 DTX
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTX
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTX
 DTS

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Common Interface Plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface connection
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1 1
SCART Port
1 1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
PC Audio in Port
 PC Audio in port
 PC Audio in port
Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video in Port
1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 3
BEST
2
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DVI Port
 DVI port
 DVI port
 DVI port
HDMI Version
 1.4
 1.4
BEST
 1.4
PC in Port
 PC in port
 PC in port
 PC in port
HDMI Port
2 3
BEST
3
BEST
Intel Wireless Display Technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
Internet Browser
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
Bluetooth Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
Network Browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Network browsing

Performance

Video Format
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
Audio Format
 AC3
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 DTS
 AC3
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 DTS
 AC3
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 DTS
Image Format
 JPG
 JPG
 JPG
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
Unknown - Click to provide data
Local Dimming
 Local dimming
 Local dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stored Teletext Page
2,000 pages 2,000 pages Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator
Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Peak Luminance Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data 65% Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Power

Typical Power Consumption
82W
BEST
96W 84W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W 0.3W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
BEST
 A+
 A+
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
120kWh
BEST
140kWh 123kWh
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
Input Voltage
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240

Certificates

DLNA Certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
56.7mm 37.8mm
BEST
56.7mm
Weight
17.8kg
BEST
20.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Weight
22.2kg
BEST
26.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight (with Stand)
18.1kg
BEST
21kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
237mm
BEST
248mm 261mm
Height (with Stand)
778mm 766mm
BEST
778mm
Width (with Stand)
1,240mm 1,233mm
BEST
1,240mm
Height
722mm 727mm 722mm
Width
1,240mm 1,233mm 1,240mm
Packaging Height
810mm 810mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
1,330mm 1,330mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback