LG 55EG910 vs LG 55EG920 vs LG 55UH850

(3)
(7)
(3)
LG 55EG910
LG 55EG920
LG 55UH850

Top Prices

eBay
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £30.00
In stock
Direct TVs
Standard delivery: £19.95
In stock
Argos
Standard delivery: £3.95
In stock
Richer Sounds
Delivery unknown
RGB Direct
Delivery unknown
eBay
PC World
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (20 available)
Currys
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (10 available)

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Three USB 2.0 ports Edit
The LG 55EG910 is a three USB 2.0 port TV, whereas the LG 55UH850 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

2.6mm thinner Edit
LG 55EG910 is 48.9mm thick (as does the LG 55EG920), but the LG 55UH850 is a 51.5mm thick TV (2.6mm thicker). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

£185 cheaper
The LG 55EG910 costs £584 less than the LG 55EG920 and costs £185 less than the LG 55UH850.
Available from 18 shops
A greater number of stores increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Expert reviews are better
The LG 55EG910 has an average expert review score of 90%, however the LG 55UH850 has an average rating of 81% (based on 3 reviews).
User reviews are vastly better
The LG 55EG910 has an average user review score of 100%, however the LG 55EG920 has an average rating of 70% (based on 2 reviews).
3 Reasons For
2.6mm thinner Edit
The LG 55EG920 has a thickness of 48.9mm (as does the LG 55EG910), however the LG 55UH850 is a 51.5mm thick TV (2.6mm thicker). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Lighter Edit
LG 55EG920 is 12.6kg heavy. That's 200g lighter than the LG 55EG910 (19.2kg) and 6.6kg lighter than the LG 55UH850 (19.2kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Expert reviews are better
The LG 55EG920 has an average expert review score of 90% based on 5 reviews, whereas the LG 55UH850 has an average rating of 81% (based on 3 reviews).
4 Reasons For
A lot higher RMS rated power Edit
The LG 55UH850 has an RMS rated power of 40W, however the LG 55EG910 and the LG 55EG920 are both only 20W RMS rated power TVs (20W lower). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UH850 is a 124kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 37kWh lower than the LG 55EG910 (124kWh) and 21kWh lower than the LG 55EG920 (124kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Cheaper to run by £37.02
The LG 55UH850 only costs £139.24 to run over five years however the LG 55EG910 costs £176.26 to run (27% more) and the LG 55EG920 costs £160.47 to run (15% more). Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UH850 is "A+", whereas the rating of the LG 55EG910 is "A" and the rating of the LG 55EG920 is "A".

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Lower RMS rated power Edit
The LG 55EG910 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as does the LG 55EG920), but the LG 55UH850 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (20W higher). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

23% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55EG910 is a 161kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 16kWh higher than the LG 55EG920 (124kWh) and 37kWh higher than the LG 55UH850 (124kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Heavier Edit
The LG 55EG910 is a 12.8kg heavy TV. That's 200g heavier than the LG 55EG920 (19.2kg) and 6.4kg lighter than the LG 55UH850 (19.2kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Six months older
The LG 55EG910 is older than the LG 55UH850 by six months.
More expensive to run over five years by 27%
Over five years the running costs of the LG 55EG910 are £176.26 which is £15.79 more than the LG 55EG920 and £37.02 more than the LG 55UH850. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is lower
The LG 55EG910 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", however the LG 55EG920 has a rating of "A" and the LG 55UH850 has a rating of "A+".
9 Reasons Against
Vastly lower RMS rated power Edit
The LG 55EG920 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as does the LG 55EG910), however the LG 55UH850 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (20W higher). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Only two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 55EG920 is two, and so does the LG 55UH850, but the LG 55EG910 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

21kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55EG920 is a 145kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 16kWh lower than the LG 55EG910 (124kWh) and 21kWh higher than the LG 55UH850 (124kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

£584 more expensive
The LG 55EG920 is more expensive than the LG 55EG910 by £584 and more expensive than the LG 55UH850 by £399.
Fewer sellers
Only 11 stores sells the LG 55EG920, but 21 stores sell the LG 55EG910. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Nine months older
The LG 55EG920 is older than the LG 55EG910 by three months and older than the LG 55UH850 by nine months.
More expensive to run over five years by 15%
Over five years the running costs of the LG 55EG920 are £160.47 which is £21.23 more than the LG 55UH850. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is worse
The LG 55EG920 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", whereas the LG 55EG910 has a rating of "A" and the LG 55UH850 has a rating of "A+".
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the LG 55EG920 is only 70%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 55EG910 is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Only two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 55UH850 is two, and so does the LG 55EG920, but the LG 55EG910 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

2.6mm thicker Edit
The LG 55UH850 has a thickness of 51.5mm, however the LG 55EG910 and the LG 55EG920 are both 48.9mm thick TVs (2.6mm thinner). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Heavier Edit
LG 55UH850 is 19.2kg heavy. That's 6.4kg heavier than the LG 55EG910 (19.2kg) and 6.6kg heavier than the LG 55EG920 (19.2kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

£185 more expensive
The LG 55UH850 is more expensive than the LG 55EG910 by £185.
Fewer sellers
Only 3 stores sells the LG 55UH850, but 21 stores sell the LG 55EG910 and 11 retailers sell the LG 55EG920. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the LG 55UH850 is 81%, whereas the average expert rating of the LG 55EG910 is 90% (based on 1 review) and the LG 55EG920 is 90% (based on 5 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 3 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
hdtvtest.co.uk: Highly Recommended
Trusted Reviews: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

16 months Ago 18 months Ago 9 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 176.26
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 176.26
Purchase price £ 915.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,091.26
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 158.64
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 160.47
Purchase price £ 1,499.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,659.47
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 136.20
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 139.24
Purchase price £ 1,100.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,239.24
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.87T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.87 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
22
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.8T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.8 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.69T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.69 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
55" 55" 55"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
 3D compatible
Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 100Hz Unknown - Click to provide data
3D Type
 Passive
 Passive
 Passive
LED Backlighting
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
 Curved
OLED Technology
Unknown - Click to provide data
 OLED technology
Unknown - Click to provide data
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 200Hz
Comb Filter
 3D
BEST
 3D
 3D
Noise Reduction Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Noise reduction feature
 Noise reduction feature
Motion Interpolation Technology
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Screen Format Adjustment
 14:9
 4:3
 Auto
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Auto
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Auto
 Zoom
 16:9
3D Technology
 FPR 3D
 FPR 3D
 FPR 3D
2D-3D Converter
 2D-3D converter
 2D-3D converter
 2D-3D converter
Picture Mastering Index (PMI)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2,700
Display Diagonal
139cm Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours
Display Technology
 OLED
 LED
BEST
 OLED
 LED
BEST
 OLED
 LED

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog
Analog Signal Format System
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
DVB-T Channel
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVB-S2 Channel
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVB-C Channel
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
Internet Browser
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
 Internet browser
Timeshift Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Timeshift feature
Operating System Version
2.0 2.0 3.0
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS

Audio

Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data ULTRA Surround 2.2
Subwoofer RMS Power
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 20W
Built-In Subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in subwoofer
RMS Rated Power
20W 20W 40W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2 2
Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Sound Mode
 News
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 News
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 News
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Audio Decoder
 DTS
 DTS
 DTS
AptX Audio Decoding
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AptX audio decoding
Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Decoding Technology
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Common Interface Plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
Common Interface Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface connection
 Common interface connection
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1 1
RF Port
2 2 2
SCART Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
RS-232 Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1 1
PC Audio in Port
 PC Audio in port
 PC Audio in port
 PC Audio in port
Composite Video in Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video in Port
1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
3
BEST
2 2
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
BEST
HDMI Port
3 3 3
Intel Wireless Display Technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
Consumer Electronics Control
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
1.3 1.3 1.3

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
Bluetooth Connection
 Bluetooth connection
 Bluetooth connection
 Bluetooth connection
WiFi Standard
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
BEST
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
WiFi Direct Connection
 WiFi direct connection
 WiFi direct connection
 WiFi direct connection
Near Field Communication
 Near field communication
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Network Browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Network browsing

Management Features

Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sleep timer
 Sleep timer
On/off Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
Smart Mode
 Personal
 Cinema
 Standard
 Sports
 Vivid
 Game
 Photo
 Personal
 Cinema
 Standard
 Sports
 Vivid
 Game
 Photo
 Personal
 Cinema
 Standard
 Sports
 Vivid
 Game
 Photo
Electronic Programme Guide
 Electronic programme guide
 Electronic programme guide
 Electronic programme guide
ECO Mode
 ECO mode
 ECO mode
 ECO mode
Programming Period
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 8 day(s)

Performance

Video Format
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
Audio Format
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 DTS
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 DTS
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 DTS
Image Format
 JPG
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG
 MPO
 JPS
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Teletext function
24p Playback
 24p playback
 24p playback
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Video Recorder
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Digital video recorder
 Digital video recorder
Local Dimming
 Local dimming
 Local dimming
 Local dimming
Clock Function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Clock function
Unknown - Click to provide data
Processor Core
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Stored Teletext Page
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2,000 pages
USB Recording
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 USB recording
Subtitles Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Subtitles function
High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 High dynamic range imaging (HDRI)
 High dynamic range imaging (HDRI)
Teletext Standard
 List
 Top-text
 List
 Top-text
 List
 Top-text

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Peak Luminance Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data 65% 65%

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting

Power

Typical Power Consumption
110W 99W 85W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
BEST
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 99W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
161kWh 145kWh 124kWh
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 85W

Certificates

DLNA Certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
RoHS Compliance Certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 RoHS compliance certificate

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
48.9mm
BEST
48.9mm
BEST
51.5mm
Weight
12.8kg 12.6kg
BEST
19.2kg
Package Weight
20.4kg
BEST
21.3kg 26.1kg
Weight (with Stand)
15kg
BEST
15.9kg 21.2kg
Depth (with Stand)
208mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 238.4mm
Height (with Stand)
760mm
BEST
762mm 775mm
Width (with Stand)
1,228mm 1,225mm
BEST
1,240mm
Height
719mm
BEST
719mm
BEST
721mm
Width
1,225mm
BEST
1,225mm
BEST
1,240mm
Packaging Height
225mm
BEST
810mm 860mm
Packaging Depth
810mm 225mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
1,435mm 1,435mm 1,360mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Included 3D Glasses
 Included 3D glasses
 Included 3D glasses
 Included 3D glasses
Desktop Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Desktop stand
Battery Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Battery included
Handheld Remote Control
 Handheld remote control
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Handheld remote control
3D Glasses Included
2 2 2
Remote Control Type
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MR15R
Cable Included
 AC
 AC
 AC
Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
 Manual

Technical Details

RF Input
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2
Feedback