LG 49UH610 vs LG 49UH661 vs LG 49UH770

(21)
(27)
(4)
LG 49UH610
LG 49UH661
LG 49UH770

Top Prices

Very
Out of stock
RICKY GAMES
Delivery unknown
PRC Direct
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
RLR Distribution
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Appliances Direct
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
Amazon UK
Out of stock
RGB Direct
Delivery unknown
Crampton and Moore
Out of stock
Beyond Television
Out of stock
Reliant Direct
Out of stock
John Lewis
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (49 available)
Electrical Experience
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Electricshop
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Selfridges
Out of stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
15% lighter Edit
The LG 49UH610 has a weight of 11.7kg, however the LG 49UH661 is a 12kg heavy TV (300g heavier) and the LG 49UH770 is a 13.4kg heavy TV (1.7kg heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Energy efficiency rating is higher
The LG 49UH610 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", but the LG 49UH661 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 49UH770 has a rating of "A".
5 Reasons For
Two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 49UH661 is two, and so does the LG 49UH770, but the LG 49UH610 only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 49UH661 is an 83kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 9kWh lower than the LG 49UH610 (114kWh) and 31kWh lower than the LG 49UH770 (114kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

£140 cheaper
The LG 49UH661 is £140.71 cheaper than the LG 49UH610 and £139.99 cheaper than the LG 49UH770.
Cheaper to run by £34.86
The LG 49UH661 only costs £93.17 to run over five years however the LG 49UH610 costs £102.78 to run (10% more) and the LG 49UH770 costs £128.03 to run (37% more). Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 49UH661 is "A+", whereas the rating of the LG 49UH610 is "A+" and the rating of the LG 49UH770 is "A".
6 Reasons For
1,300 bigger picture mastering index (PMI) Edit
The LG 49UH770 has a picture mastering index (PMI) of 2,500, but the LG 49UH610 and the LG 49UH661 are both only 1,200 TVs (1,300 smaller).
Two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 49UH770 is two, and so does the LG 49UH661, but the LG 49UH610 only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

27.7mm thinner Edit
The LG 49UH770 has a thickness of 53.8mm, however the LG 49UH610 is an 81.5mm thick TV (27.7mm thicker) and the LG 49UH661 is a 77.2mm thick TV (23.4mm thicker). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Available from 30 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
More popular
The LG 49UH770 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 6244 by sales volume in our TVs, whereas the LG 49UH610 ranks No. 16720 and the LG 49UH661 ranks No. 28346.
User reviews are marginally better
The LG 49UH770 has an average user review score of 95% based on 4 reviews, whereas the LG 49UH610 has an average rating of 94% (based on 20 reviews) and the LG 49UH661 has an average rating of 82% (based on 27 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Vastly smaller picture mastering index (PMI) Edit
The LG 49UH610 is a 1,200 TV, and so does the LG 49UH661. That's 1,300 smaller than the LG 49UH770 (2,500).
One less USB 2.0 port Edit
The LG 49UH610 has one USB 2.0 port, however the LG 49UH770 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

9kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 49UH610 has an annual energy consumption of 92kWh, but the LG 49UH661 is an 83kWh annual energy consumption TV (9kWh lower) and the LG 49UH770 is a 114kWh annual energy consumption TV (22kWh higher). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

34% thicker Edit
The LG 49UH610 is an 81.5mm thick TV. That's 4.3mm thicker than the LG 49UH661 (53.8mm) and 27.7mm thicker than the LG 49UH770 (53.8mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

More expensive by £141
The LG 49UH610 is £140.71 more expensive than the LG 49UH661 and £0.72 more expensive than the LG 49UH770.
Not as many stockists
The LG 49UH610 is only stocked by 2 shops, however the LG 49UH661 is stocked by 30 shops and the LG 49UH770 is stocked by 32 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
Higher running costs over five years by £9.61
The LG 49UH610 costs £102.78 to run which is £9.61 more to run than the LG 49UH661 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The LG 49UH610 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 16720 by number of sales in our TVs, but the LG 49UH770 ranks No. 6244.
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The LG 49UH610 has an average user score of 94%, but the LG 49UH770 has an average user rating of 95% (based on 4 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
1,300 smaller picture mastering index (PMI) Edit
The LG 49UH661 has a picture mastering index (PMI) of 1,200 (as does the LG 49UH610), but the LG 49UH770 is a 2,500 TV (1,300 bigger).
23.4mm thicker Edit
The LG 49UH661 has a thickness of 77.2mm, however the LG 49UH610 is an 81.5mm thick TV (4.3mm thicker) and the LG 49UH770 is a 53.8mm thick TV (23.4mm thinner). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Heavier Edit
LG 49UH661 is 12kg heavy. That's 300g heavier than the LG 49UH610 (13.4kg) and 1.4kg lighter than the LG 49UH770 (13.4kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Fewer sellers
Only 30 retailers sells the LG 49UH661, but 32 sellers sell the LG 49UH770. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Worse selling
The LG 49UH661 ranks No. 28346 by sales volume, whereas the LG 49UH610 ranks No. 16720 and the LG 49UH770 ranks No. 6244.
A lot Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the LG 49UH661 is 82%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 49UH610 is 94% (based on 20 reviews) and the LG 49UH770 is 95% (based on 4 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 49UH770 is a 114kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 22kWh higher than the LG 49UH610 (114kWh) and 31kWh higher than the LG 49UH661 (114kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Heavier Edit
LG 49UH770 is 13.4kg heavy. That's 1.7kg heavier than the LG 49UH610 (13.4kg) and 1.4kg heavier than the LG 49UH661 (13.4kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

£140 more expensive
The LG 49UH770 is more expensive than the LG 49UH661 by £139.99.
More expensive to run over five years by 37%
The running costs of the LG 49UH770 are £128.03 which is £25.25 more than the LG 49UH610 and £34.86 more than the LG 49UH661 over five years. Show assumptions.
Energy efficiency rating is worse
The LG 49UH770 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", whereas the LG 49UH610 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 49UH661 has a rating of "A+".

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

9 months Ago 9 months Ago 9 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 100.95
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 102.78
Purchase price £ 639.71
Total cost of ownership £ 742.49
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 91.34
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 93.17
Purchase price £ 499.00
Total cost of ownership £ 592.17
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 124.99
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 128.03
Purchase price £ 638.99
Total cost of ownership £ 767.02
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.51T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.51 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.46T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.46 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.64T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.64 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
16
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
49" 49" 49"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 200Hz
LED Backlighting
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Noise Reduction Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Noise reduction feature
 Noise reduction feature
Motion Interpolation Technology
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
Video Mode
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
Picture Mastering Index (PMI)
1,200 1,200 2,500
BEST
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
 LED
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
Display Diagonal
123cm 123cm 123cm
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
Internet Browser
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
Unknown - Click to provide data
Timeshift Feature
 Timeshift feature
 Timeshift feature
 Timeshift feature
HbbTV
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HbbTV
Operating System Version
3.0 3.0 3.0
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2
Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Sound Mode
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Audio Decoder
 DTS
 DTS
 DTS
Audio Decoding Technology
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 1 1
Digital Audio Coaxial Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Digital audio coaxial out port
Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1 1
RF Port
2 2 2
SCART Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RS-232 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1 1
PC Audio in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio in port
Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 2
BEST
2
BEST
HDMI Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
HDMI Port
3 3 3
Intel Wireless Display Technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
Consumer Electronics Control
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
Mobile High-Definition Link
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile high-definition link
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
Bluetooth Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth connection
 Bluetooth connection
WiFi Standard
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
BEST
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
WiFi Direct Connection
 WiFi direct connection
 WiFi direct connection
 WiFi direct connection
Network Browsing
 Network browsing
 Network browsing
 Network browsing

Management Features

Sleep Timer
 Sleep timer
 Sleep timer
 Sleep timer
Smart Mode
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
Electronic Programme Guide
 Electronic programme guide
 Electronic programme guide
 Electronic programme guide
ECO Mode
 ECO mode
 ECO mode
 ECO mode
OSD Language
34 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Firmware Upgrade Method
 USB
 USB
 USB
Programming Period
8 day(s) 8 day(s) 8 day(s)

Performance

Video Format
 H.265
 H.265
 H.265
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
Local Dimming
 Local dimming
 Local dimming
 Local dimming
Processor Core
4 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Stored Teletext Page
2,000 pages 2,000 pages 2,000 pages
USB Recording
 USB recording
Unknown - Click to provide data
 USB recording
Subtitles Function
 Subtitles function
 Subtitles function
 Subtitles function

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Peak Luminance Ratio
65% 65% 65%

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Typical Power Consumption
63W 57W
BEST
78W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
BEST
 A+
BEST
 A+
Annual Energy Consumption
92kWh 83kWh
BEST
114kWh
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50

Certificates

DLNA Certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
ECO Compliant
 ECO compliant
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
81.5mm 77.2mm 53.8mm
BEST
Weight
11.7kg
BEST
12kg 13.4kg
Package Weight
15.6kg
BEST
17.7kg 19.1kg
Weight (with Stand)
12kg
BEST
13.7kg 15.4kg
Depth (with Stand)
218mm
BEST
282mm 263mm
Height (with Stand)
707mm 702mm 695mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,108mm 1,106mm 1,102mm
BEST
Height
657mm 646mm 640mm
Width
1,108mm 1,106mm 1,102mm
Packaging Height
775mm
BEST
810mm 775mm
BEST
Packaging Width
1,197mm 1,197mm 1,197mm

Packaging Content

Desktop Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Desktop stand
Unknown - Click to provide data
Battery Included
 Battery included
 Battery included
 Battery included
Handheld Remote Control
 Handheld remote control
 Handheld remote control
 Handheld remote control
Remote Control Type
L-con Unknown - Click to provide data MR15R
Cable Included
 AC
 AC
 AC
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
 Manual
Warranty Card
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Warranty card
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback