Hisense H65M5500 vs Philips 55BDL4050

Hisense H65M5500
Philips 55BDL4050

Top Prices

John Lewis
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (36 available)
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £60.26
In stock
Richer Sounds
Out of stock
IT-Supplier.co.uk
Delivery unknown
In stock (23 available)

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
16% larger screen size Edit
The Hisense H65M5500 has a screen size of 65", however the Philips 55BDL4050 is only a 54.64" TV (10.36" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

Cheaper by £370
The Hisense H65M5500 costs £889.99, whereas the Philips 55BDL4050 is £1,259.96.
3 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
4 Reasons For
Three point five audio in ports Edit
The number of audio in ports on the Philips 55BDL4050 is three point five, but the Hisense H65M5500 only has one audio in port.
Thinner Edit
The Philips 55BDL4050 has a thickness of 45.72mm. That's 16.28mm thinner than the Hisense H65M5500 (45.72mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Hugely lighter Edit
Philips 55BDL4050 is 18kg heavy, but the Hisense H65M5500 is a 31kg heavy TV (13kg heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Cheaper to run by £183.27
Over five years the Philips 55BDL4050 only costs £124.22 to run however the Hisense H65M5500 costs £307.49 to run (148% more). Read more

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Only one audio in port Edit
The Hisense H65M5500 has one audio in port, however the Philips 55BDL4050 only has three point five audio in ports.
27% thicker Edit
The Hisense H65M5500 is a 62mm thick TV. That's 16.28mm thicker than the Philips 55BDL4050 (45.72mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

13kg heavier Edit
The Hisense H65M5500 has a weight of 31kg, however the Philips 55BDL4050 is an 18kg heavy TV (13kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Older by two months
The Hisense H65M5500 is two months older than the Philips 55BDL4050.
Higher running costs over five years by £183.27
The running costs of the Hisense H65M5500 are £307.49 which is £183.27 more than the Philips 55BDL4050 over five years. Show assumptions.
3 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The Philips 55BDL4050 has a screen size of 54.64", but the Hisense H65M5500 is a 65" TV (10.36" larger). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

More expensive by £370
The Philips 55BDL4050 is £369.97 more expensive than the Hisense H65M5500.
Fewer sellers
The Philips 55BDL4050 is only stocked by 1 shop, but the Hisense H65M5500 is stocked by 4 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

9 months Ago 6 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 304.45
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 307.49
Purchase price £ 889.99
Total cost of ownership £ 1,197.48
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 121.78
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.44
Total running cost £ 124.22
Purchase price £ 1,259.96
Total cost of ownership £ 1,384.18
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

1.5T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 1.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
39
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.62T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.62 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
16
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
65"
BEST
54.64"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
1,000Hz Unknown - Click to provide data
Comb Filter
 3D
BEST
 3D
Motion Interpolation Technology
 Smart Motion Rate (SMR)
 Smart Motion Rate (SMR)
Response Time
Unknown - Click to provide data 12ms
Display Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data 450 cd/m²
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 138.8cm
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Colour Depth
10 Unknown - Click to provide data
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
Unknown - Click to provide data
Internet Browser
 Internet browser
Unknown - Click to provide data
Timeshift Feature
 Timeshift feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
HbbTV
 HbbTV
Unknown - Click to provide data
Video App
 NetFlix
 NetFlix
Operating System Version
VIDAA 2.0 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating System
 Android
 Android

Audio

Equaliser
 Equaliser
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
30W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Decoding Technology
 Dolby MS10
 Dolby MS10

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus
 Common interface plus
Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
RF Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
SCART Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video in Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio in Port
1 4
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
WiFi Standard
 802.11ac
 802.11a
BEST
 802.11ac
 802.11a
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Unknown - Click to provide data

Management Features

On Screen Display
 On screen display
Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data
Hotel Mode
 Hotel mode
Unknown - Click to provide data

Performance

Video Format
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 RM
 FLV
 3GP
 MOV
 MPG
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 MKV
 VOB
 VC-1
 TS
 WEBM
 H.265
 MVC
 VRO
 VP9
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 RM
 FLV
 3GP
 MOV
 MPG
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 MKV
 VOB
 VC-1
 TS
 WEBM
 H.265
 MVC
 VRO
 VP9
Audio Format
 FLAC
 MP2
 MP3
 MP4
 OGG
 WMA
 WMV
 FLAC
 MP2
 MP3
 MP4
 OGG
 WMA
 WMV
Image Format
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 MPO
 JPS
 WEBP
 PNS
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 MPO
 JPS
 WEBP
 PNS
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
Unknown - Click to provide data
Extended PVR
 Extended PVR
Unknown - Click to provide data
Processor Core
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Stored Teletext Page
899 pages Unknown - Click to provide data
Logical Channel Number (LCN)
 Logical Channel Number (LCN)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Luminance
65% Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Typical Power Consumption
190W 76W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.4W
BEST
Energy Efficiency Class
 A
BEST
 A
Annual Energy Consumption
130kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 20-24
 20-24
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50

Certificates

RoHS Compliance Certificate
 RoHS compliance certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
62mm 45.72mm
BEST
Weight
31kg 18kg
BEST
Package Weight
38kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
315mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
898mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width (with Stand)
1,458mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
854mm 711.2mm
BEST
Width
1,458mm 1,231.9mm
BEST
Packaging Height
965mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
1,624mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Packaging Content

Desktop Stand
 Desktop stand
Unknown - Click to provide data
Handheld Remote Control
 Handheld remote control
Unknown - Click to provide data
Battery Type
AAA Unknown - Click to provide data
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Battery
 Supported battery
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data 50h
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.63 x 0.63
Set Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.8"
Set Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 48.5"
Set Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 28"
Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 48.5 x 1.8 x 28
Feedback