LG 55UF680 vs Panasonic TX-55DX600 vs Philips 55PUH4900 vs Philips 55PUT6400

(50)
LG 55UF680
Panasonic TX-55DX600
Philips 55PUH4900
Philips 55PUT6400

Top Prices

RLR Distribution
Out of stock
Crampton and Moore
Standard delivery: £9.99
In stock
Sonic Direct
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Co-op Electrical
Standard delivery: £4.99
In stock
TPS
Delivery unknown
Hi-Way Hi-Fi
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £4.00
In stock
Electrical Experience
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £1.99
In stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (12 available)
AWD-IT
Out of stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
40% thinner Edit
The LG 55UF680 is a 56.7mm thick TV. That's 22.3mm thinner than the Philips 55PUH4900 and the Philips 55PUT6400 (79mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy efficiency rating is higher
The LG 55UF680 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", but the Panasonic TX-55DX600 has a rating of "A", the Philips 55PUH4900 has a rating of "A" and the Philips 55PUT6400 has a rating of "A+".
5 Reasons For
A lot faster motion interpolation frequency Edit
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 has a motion interpolation frequency of 800Hz, whereas the Philips 55PUH4900 is only a 400Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (400Hz slower) and the Philips 55PUT6400 is only a 700Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (100Hz slower). Read more

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source. Motion interpolation technology can sometimes create some unwanted side effects such glitches when the technology suddenly activates during an action scene. Most modern TVs will have an option to switch off the motion interpolation if it is not desired.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

4W higher RMS rated power Edit
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 is a 20W RMS rated power TV, and so does the Philips 55PUT6400. That's 4W higher than the Philips 55PUH4900 (20W). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Two more processor cores Edit
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 is a four processor core TV, whereas the Philips 55PUT6400 only has two processor cores. Read more

We do not know the number of processor cores on the LG 55UF680. It is possible that it does not have any processor cores.

32 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Better selling
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 ranks No. 28361 by number of sales, but the Philips 55PUH4900 ranks No. 128000 and the Philips 55PUT6400 ranks No. 202975.
3 Reasons For
67% lower power consumption when switched off Edit
The Philips 55PUH4900 is a 0.3W power consumption when switched off TV, and so does the Philips 55PUT6400. That's 0.2W lower than the Panasonic TX-55DX600 (0.3W).
2.7kg lighter Edit
The Philips 55PUH4900 is a 15.3kg heavy TV (as does the Philips 55PUT6400), whereas the LG 55UF680 is a 17.8kg heavy TV (2.5kg heavier) and the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is an 18kg heavy TV (2.7kg heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Cheaper by £213
The Philips 55PUH4900 costs £333 less than the Panasonic TX-55DX600 and costs £213 less than the Philips 55PUT6400.
8 Reasons For
20% higher RMS rated power Edit
The Philips 55PUT6400 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as does the Panasonic TX-55DX600), however the Philips 55PUH4900 is only a 16W RMS rated power TV (4W lower). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Three USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the Philips 55PUT6400 is three, but the Panasonic TX-55DX600 only has one USB 2.0 port and the Philips 55PUH4900 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Two more HDMI ports Edit
The Philips 55PUT6400 is a four HDMI port TV, whereas the LG 55UF680 only has two HDMI ports and the Philips 55PUH4900 only has three HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Philips 55PUT6400 is a 98kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 22kWh lower than the LG 55UF680 (98kWh), 62kWh lower than the Panasonic TX-55DX600 (98kWh) and 50kWh lower than the Philips 55PUH4900 (98kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

0.2W lower power consumption when switched off Edit
The Philips 55PUT6400 has a power consumption when switched off of 0.3W (as does the Philips 55PUH4900), whereas the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is a 0.5W power consumption when switched off TV (0.2W higher).
Lighter Edit
Philips 55PUT6400 is 15.3kg heavy, and so does the Philips 55PUH4900. That's 2.5kg lighter than the LG 55UF680 (15.3kg) and 2.7kg lighter than the Panasonic TX-55DX600 (15.3kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Cheaper to run by £76.91
The Philips 55PUT6400 only costs £110.40 to run over five years however the LG 55UF680 costs £133.23 to run (21% more), the Panasonic TX-55DX600 costs £187.31 to run (70% more) and the Philips 55PUH4900 costs £164.88 to run (49% more). Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Philips 55PUT6400 is "A+", whereas the rating of the LG 55UF680 is "A+", the rating of the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is "A" and the rating of the Philips 55PUH4900 is "A".

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Two less USB 2.0 ports Edit
The LG 55UF680 has one USB 2.0 port (as does the Panasonic TX-55DX600), however the Philips 55PUH4900 only has two USB 2.0 ports and the Philips 55PUT6400 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Only two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the LG 55UF680 is two, but the Philips 55PUH4900 only has three HDMI ports and the Philips 55PUT6400 only has four HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF680 has an annual energy consumption of 120kWh, but the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is a 160kWh annual energy consumption TV (40kWh higher), the Philips 55PUH4900 is a 148kWh annual energy consumption TV (28kWh higher) and the Philips 55PUT6400 is a 98kWh annual energy consumption TV (22kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

15% heavier Edit
The LG 55UF680 has a weight of 17.8kg, however the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is an 18kg heavy TV (200g heavier) and the Philips 55PUH4900 and the Philips 55PUT6400 are both 15.3kg heavy TVs (2.5kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Not as many stockists
The LG 55UF680 is only stocked by 1 retailer, however the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is stocked by 33 sellers and the Philips 55PUT6400 is stocked by 6 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
Older by one year
The LG 55UF680 is one year older than the Panasonic TX-55DX600, seven months older than the Philips 55PUH4900 and four months older than the Philips 55PUT6400.
Higher running costs over five years by £22.83
Over five years the LG 55UF680 costs £133.23 to run which is £22.83 more to run than the Philips 55PUT6400. Show assumptions.
8 Reasons Against
Two less USB 2.0 ports Edit
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 has one USB 2.0 port (as does the LG 55UF680), however the Philips 55PUH4900 only has two USB 2.0 ports and the Philips 55PUT6400 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Only three HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is three, and so does the Philips 55PUH4900, but the Philips 55PUT6400 only has four HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

62kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 has an annual energy consumption of 160kWh, but the LG 55UF680 is a 120kWh annual energy consumption TV (40kWh lower), the Philips 55PUH4900 is a 148kWh annual energy consumption TV (12kWh lower) and the Philips 55PUT6400 is a 98kWh annual energy consumption TV (62kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

40% higher power consumption when switched off Edit
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 is a 0.5W power consumption when switched off TV. That's 0.2W higher than the Philips 55PUH4900 and the Philips 55PUT6400 (0.3W).
15% heavier Edit
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 has a weight of 18kg, however the LG 55UF680 is a 17.8kg heavy TV (200g lighter) and the Philips 55PUH4900 and the Philips 55PUT6400 are both 15.3kg heavy TVs (2.7kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

More expensive by £333
The Panasonic TX-55DX600 is £333 more expensive than the Philips 55PUH4900 and £120 more expensive than the Philips 55PUT6400.
Higher running costs over five years by £76.91
Over five years the running costs of the Panasonic TX-55DX600 are £187.31 which is £54.08 more than the LG 55UF680, £22.43 more than the Philips 55PUH4900 and £76.91 more than the Philips 55PUT6400. Show assumptions.
Inferior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is "A", but the rating of the LG 55UF680 is "A+", the rating of the Philips 55PUH4900 is "A" and the rating of the Philips 55PUT6400 is "A+".
12 Reasons Against
Slower motion interpolation frequency Edit
The Philips 55PUH4900 has a motion interpolation frequency of 400Hz, but the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is an 800Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (400Hz faster) and the Philips 55PUT6400 is a 700Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (300Hz faster). Read more

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source. Motion interpolation technology can sometimes create some unwanted side effects such glitches when the technology suddenly activates during an action scene. Most modern TVs will have an option to switch off the motion interpolation if it is not desired.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Lower RMS rated power Edit
The Philips 55PUH4900 is a 16W RMS rated power TV. That's 4W lower than the Panasonic TX-55DX600 and the Philips 55PUT6400 (20W). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

One less USB 2.0 port Edit
The Philips 55PUH4900 is a two USB 2.0 port TV, whereas the Philips 55PUT6400 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Only three HDMI ports Edit
The Philips 55PUH4900 has three HDMI ports, and so does the Panasonic TX-55DX600, however the Philips 55PUT6400 only has four HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

Two less processor cores Edit
The number of processor cores on the Philips 55PUH4900 is two (as does the Philips 55PUT6400), but the Panasonic TX-55DX600 only has four processor cores. Read more

We do not know the number of processor cores on the LG 55UF680. It is possible that it does not have any processor cores.

50kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Philips 55PUH4900 has an annual energy consumption of 148kWh, however the LG 55UF680 is a 120kWh annual energy consumption TV (28kWh lower), the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is a 160kWh annual energy consumption TV (12kWh higher) and the Philips 55PUT6400 is a 98kWh annual energy consumption TV (50kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

29% thicker Edit
Philips 55PUH4900 is 79mm thick, and so does the Philips 55PUT6400. That's 22.3mm thicker than the LG 55UF680 (79mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Less retailers
The Philips 55PUH4900 is only stocked by 1 retailer, whereas the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is stocked by 33 stores and the Philips 55PUT6400 is stocked by 6 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Older by five months
The Philips 55PUH4900 is five months older than the Panasonic TX-55DX600.
Higher running costs over five years by £54.48
The running costs of the Philips 55PUH4900 are £164.88 which is £31.65 more than the LG 55UF680 and £54.48 more than the Philips 55PUT6400 over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Philips 55PUH4900 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 128000 by number of sales in our TVs, however the Panasonic TX-55DX600 ranks No. 28361.
Lower energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Philips 55PUH4900 is "A", however the rating of the LG 55UF680 is "A+", the rating of the Panasonic TX-55DX600 is "A" and the rating of the Philips 55PUT6400 is "A+".
7 Reasons Against
15% slower motion interpolation frequency Edit
The Philips 55PUT6400 is a 700Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 100Hz slower than the Panasonic TX-55DX600 (700Hz) and 300Hz faster than the Philips 55PUH4900 (700Hz). Read more

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source. Motion interpolation technology can sometimes create some unwanted side effects such glitches when the technology suddenly activates during an action scene. Most modern TVs will have an option to switch off the motion interpolation if it is not desired.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Only two processor cores Edit
The Philips 55PUT6400 has two processor cores, and so does the Philips 55PUH4900, however the Panasonic TX-55DX600 only has four processor cores. Read more

We do not know the number of processor cores on the LG 55UF680. It is possible that it does not have any processor cores.

22.3mm thicker Edit
The Philips 55PUT6400 has a thickness of 79mm (as does the Philips 55PUH4900), however the LG 55UF680 is a 56.7mm thick TV (22.3mm thinner). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

£213 more expensive
The Philips 55PUT6400 is more expensive than the Philips 55PUH4900 by £213.
Fewer sellers
Only 6 retailers sells the Philips 55PUT6400, but 33 shops sell the Panasonic TX-55DX600. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Eight months older
The Philips 55PUT6400 is older than the Panasonic TX-55DX600 by eight months and older than the Philips 55PUH4900 by three months.
Worse selling
The Philips 55PUT6400 ranks No. 202975 by sales volume, whereas the Panasonic TX-55DX600 ranks No. 28361 and the Philips 55PUH4900 ranks No. 128000.

Awards

No awards found No awards found No awards found 1 Award
homecinemachoice.com: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 9 months Ago 15 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 131.40
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 133.23
Electricity cost - switched on £ 184.27
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 187.31
Purchase price £ 649.00
Total cost of ownership £ 836.31
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 161.84
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 164.88
Purchase price £ 316.00
Total cost of ownership £ 480.88
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 107.36
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 110.40
Purchase price £ 529.00
Total cost of ownership £ 639.40
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.66T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.66 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.93T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.93 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
24
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.82T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.82 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
21
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.55T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.55 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
14
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
55" 55" 55" 55"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D compatible
LED Backlighting
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
 Edge-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 800Hz
BEST
400Hz 700Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 IFC (Intelligent Frame Creation)
 IFC (Intelligent Frame Creation)
 IFC (Intelligent Frame Creation)
 IFC (Intelligent Frame Creation)
Display Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
BEST
 LED
 LED
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm 139cm 139cm
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog
Analog Signal Format System
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
Internet Browser
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
 Internet browser
HbbTV
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HbbTV
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Video App
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
Music App
 Spotify
 Spotify
 Spotify
 Spotify
Interactive TV
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Interactive TV
Video On Demand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Video on demand
Operating System Version
2.0 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Android 5.0 Lollipop
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS
User Memory Capacity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 8GB
My Home Screen
Unknown - Click to provide data
 My Home Screen
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Audio

RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 20W
BEST
16W 20W
BEST
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Sound Mode
 Standard
 Music
 Environment
 Standard
 Music
 Environment
 Standard
 Music
 Environment
 Standard
 Music
 Environment

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
Common Interface Plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
Common Interface Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface connection
 Common interface connection
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RF Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
SCART Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1 1 1
PC Audio in Port
 PC Audio in port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video in Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 1 2 3
BEST
Audio Input Port for DVI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input port for DVI
 Audio input port for DVI
DVI Port
 DVI port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDCP Security Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP security feature
 HDCP security feature
 HDCP security feature
PC in Port
 PC in port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2 3 3 4
BEST
Intel Wireless Display Technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Consumer Electronics Control
 VIERA Link
 VIERA Link
 VIERA Link
 VIERA Link
Audio in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Return Channel (ARC)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio Return Channel (ARC)
 Audio Return Channel (ARC)
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RF Connector Type
 F
 C
 IEC
 F, IEC
 F
 C
 IEC
 F, IEC
 F
 C
 IEC
 F, IEC
 F
 C
 IEC
 F, IEC

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 WiFi connection
WiFi Standard
 802.11n
 802.11n
 802.11n
 802.11n
BEST
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN connection
Miracast
 Miracast
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Miracast
WiFi Direct Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 WiFi direct connection
Network Browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Network browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Management Features

On/off Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off timer
 On/off timer
Automatic Shut Off Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Automatic shut off function
Upgradeable Firmware
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Upgradeable firmware
 Upgradeable firmware
On Screen Display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen display
Electronic Programme Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Electronic programme guide
 Electronic programme guide
 Electronic programme guide
Picture Mute (for Radio)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture mute (for radio)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Auto Power Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Auto power off
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 27 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Firmware Upgrade Method
 USB
 Auto upgrade wizard
 USB
 Auto upgrade wizard
 USB
 Auto upgrade wizard
 USB
 Auto upgrade wizard
Hotel Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Hotel mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Performance

Video Format
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 H.265
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 VC-1
 WMV9
 AVC
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 H.265
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 VC-1
 WMV9
 AVC
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 H.265
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 VC-1
 WMV9
 AVC
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 H.265
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 VC-1
 WMV9
 AVC
Audio Format
 AC3
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
 AC3
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
 AC3
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
 AC3
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
Image Format
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 MPO
 JPS
 PNS
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 MPO
 JPS
 PNS
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 MPO
 JPS
 PNS
 JPG
 PNG
 GIF
 BMP
 MPO
 JPS
 PNS
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Local Dimming
 Local dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Local dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data
Processor Core
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
BEST
2 2
Subtitle Format
 SUB
 SRT
 SSA
 ASS
 SMI
 TXT
 SUB
 SRT
 SSA
 ASS
 SMI
 TXT
 SUB
 SRT
 SSA
 ASS
 SMI
 TXT
 SUB
 SRT
 SSA
 ASS
 SMI
 TXT
Stored Teletext Page
2,000 pages
BEST
1,000 pages 1,000 pages 1,000 pages
Subtitles Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Subtitles function
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Signal Strength Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Signal strength indicator
 Signal strength indicator

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Power

Typical Power Consumption
82W 115W 101W 67W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
BEST
 A+
 A+
 A+
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
120kWh 160kWh 148kWh 98kWh
BEST
Power Consumption When Switched Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
 50
Input Voltage
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240

Certificates

DLNA Certificate
 DLNA certificate
 DLNA certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DLNA Specification
 DMS
 DMR
 RUI 2.0
 DTCP-IP
 DMS
 DMR
 RUI 2.0
 DTCP-IP
 DMS
 DMR
 RUI 2.0
 DTCP-IP
 DMS
 DMR
 RUI 2.0
 DTCP-IP

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
56.7mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 79mm 79mm
Weight
17.8kg 18kg 15.3kg
BEST
15.3kg
BEST
Package Weight
22.2kg 25kg 20kg
BEST
24.3kg
Weight (with Stand)
18.1kg 21kg 15.6kg
BEST
17.8kg
Depth (with Stand)
237mm 776mm 211mm
BEST
266mm
Height (with Stand)
778mm 364mm
BEST
764mm 773mm
Width (with Stand)
1,240mm 1,244mm 1,239mm
BEST
1,239mm
BEST
Height
722mm Unknown - Click to provide data 725mm 712mm
Width
1,240mm 1,244mm 1,239mm 1,239mm
Packaging Height
810mm
BEST
812mm 830mm 825mm
Packaging Width
1,330mm
BEST
1,675mm 1,330mm
BEST
1,413mm

Packaging Content

Desktop Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Desktop stand
 Desktop stand
Battery Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Battery included
 Battery included
Handheld Remote Control
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Handheld remote control
 Handheld remote control
Cable Included
 AC
 AC
 AC
 AC
Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide

Operational Conditions

Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35 5 - 35

Technical Details

LED Backlight
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED backlight
Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Box Dimension
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1413 x 131 x 825
USB Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2 3
BEST
Feedback