LG 49UF695 vs LG 49UH610 vs LG 55UF770 vs Panasonic TX-49DX600

(4)
(21)
(8)
LG 49UF695
LG 49UH610
LG 55UF770
Panasonic TX-49DX600

Top Prices

RLR Distribution
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (13 available)
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
Atlantic Electrics Ltd
Out of stock
Radiocraft
Delivery unknown
Donaghy Bros
Delivery unknown
In stock
Superfi
Out of stock
RGB Direct
Delivery unknown
Littlewoods
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Very
Delivery unknown
In stock
Tesco
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Electrical Experience
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Electronic Empire
Delivery unknown
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Boots Kitchen Appliances
Standard delivery: £39.98
In stock
ao
FREE Standard delivery
Sonic Direct
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Richer Sounds
Out of stock
RGB Direct
Delivery unknown
TPS
Delivery unknown
Multiregion Magic
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
Two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The LG 49UF695 is a two USB 2.0 port TV, and so does the LG 55UF770, whereas the Panasonic TX-49DX600 only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

2x thinner Edit
LG 49UF695 is 38.2mm thick, but the LG 49UH610 is an 81.5mm thick TV (43.3mm thicker), the LG 55UF770 is a 56.7mm thick TV (18.5mm thicker) and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 is a 66mm thick TV (27.8mm thicker). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

6 Reasons For
37% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 49UH610 is a 92kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 34kWh lower than the LG 49UF695 (117kWh), 31kWh lower than the LG 55UF770 (117kWh) and 25kWh lower than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 (117kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

50% lighter Edit
LG 49UH610 is 11.7kg heavy. That's 5.8kg lighter than the LG 49UF695 (16kg) and 4.3kg lighter than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 (16kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

£49 cheaper
The LG 49UH610 is £50 cheaper than the LG 49UF695, £149.01 cheaper than the LG 55UF770 and £49.01 cheaper than the Panasonic TX-49DX600.
Cheaper to run by £36.86
The LG 49UH610 is £36.86 cheaper to run than the LG 49UF695, £33.65 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF770 and £34.86 cheaper to run than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 over five years. Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 49UH610 is "A+", whereas the rating of the LG 49UF695 is "A", the rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+" and the rating of the Panasonic TX-49DX600 is "A".
User reviews are better
Based on 20 reviews, the LG 49UH610 has an average user review score of 94%, whereas the LG 49UF695 has an average rating of 80% (based on 4 reviews) and the LG 55UF770 has an average rating of 86% (based on 7 reviews).
3 Reasons For
Larger screen size Edit
The LG 55UF770 has a screen size of 55", but the LG 49UF695, the LG 49UH610 and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 are all only 49" TVs (6" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

One more USB 2.0 port Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 55UF770 is two (as does the LG 49UF695), but the Panasonic TX-49DX600 only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Energy efficiency rating is superior
The LG 55UF770 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the LG 49UF695 has a rating of "A", the LG 49UH610 has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 has a rating of "A".
2 Reasons For
31 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
Better selling
The Panasonic TX-49DX600 ranks No. 3947 by number of sales, however the LG 49UF695 ranks No. 138001, the LG 49UH610 ranks No. 6381 and the LG 55UF770 ranks No. 62213.

Reasons Against

10 Reasons Against
6" smaller screen size Edit
The LG 49UF695 is a 49" TV, and so do the LG 49UH610 and the Panasonic TX-49DX600. That's 6" smaller than the LG 55UF770 (49"). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

27% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 49UF695 is a 126kWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 34kWh higher than the LG 49UH610 (117kWh), 3kWh higher than the LG 55UF770 (117kWh) and 9kWh higher than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 (117kWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

34% heavier Edit
The LG 49UF695 is a 17.5kg heavy TV. That's 5.8kg heavier than the LG 49UH610 (16kg) and 1.5kg heavier than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 (16kg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

£50 more expensive
The LG 49UF695 is more expensive than the LG 49UH610 by £50 and more expensive than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 by £0.99.
Less retailers
Only 12 stores sells the LG 49UF695, whereas 18 retailers sell the LG 55UF770 and 35 sellers sell the Panasonic TX-49DX600. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
One year older
The LG 49UF695 is older than the LG 49UH610 by one year, older than the LG 55UF770 by one month and older than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 by one year.
36% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the LG 49UF695 are £139.64 which is £36.86 more than the LG 49UH610, £3.21 more than the LG 55UF770 and £2.00 more than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The LG 49UF695 ranks No. 138001 by sales volume, however the LG 49UH610 ranks No. 6381, the LG 55UF770 ranks No. 62213 and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 ranks No. 3947.
Energy efficiency rating is lower
The LG 49UF695 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", however the LG 49UH610 has a rating of "A+", the LG 55UF770 has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 has a rating of "A".
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The LG 49UF695's average user rating is 80%, however the LG 49UH610's is 94% (based on 20 reviews) and the LG 55UF770's is 86% (based on 7 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The LG 49UH610 is a 49" TV, and so do the LG 49UF695 and the Panasonic TX-49DX600. That's 6" smaller than the LG 55UF770 (49"). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

Only one USB 2.0 port Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 49UH610 is one, and so does the Panasonic TX-49DX600, but the LG 55UF770 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Vastly thicker Edit
The LG 49UH610 has a thickness of 81.5mm, however the LG 49UF695 is a 38.2mm thick TV (43.3mm thinner), the LG 55UF770 is a 56.7mm thick TV (24.8mm thinner) and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 is a 66mm thick TV (15.5mm thinner). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Fewer sellers
Only 4 retailers sells the LG 49UH610, but 12 sellers sell the LG 49UF695, 18 sellers sell the LG 55UF770 and 35 stores sell the Panasonic TX-49DX600. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Worse selling
The LG 49UH610 ranks No. 6381 by sales volume, whereas the Panasonic TX-49DX600 ranks No. 3947.
8 Reasons Against
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF770 has an annual energy consumption of 123kWh, whereas the LG 49UF695 is a 126kWh annual energy consumption TV (3kWh higher), the LG 49UH610 is a 92kWh annual energy consumption TV (31kWh lower) and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV (6kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Thicker Edit
The LG 55UF770 has a thickness of 56.7mm. That's 18.5mm thicker than the LG 49UF695 (66mm), 24.8mm thinner than the LG 49UH610 (66mm) and 9.3mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-49DX600 (66mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

More expensive by £149
The LG 55UF770 is £99.01 more expensive than the LG 49UF695, £149.01 more expensive than the LG 49UH610 and £100 more expensive than the Panasonic TX-49DX600.
Fewer sellers
The LG 55UF770 is only stocked by 18 retailers, but the Panasonic TX-49DX600 is stocked by 35 shops. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by eleven months
The LG 55UF770 is eleven months older than the LG 49UH610 and eleven months older than the Panasonic TX-49DX600.
£33.65 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the LG 55UF770 costs £136.43 to run which is £33.65 more to run than the LG 49UH610. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The LG 55UF770 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 62213 by number of sales in our TVs, whereas the LG 49UH610 ranks No. 6381 and the Panasonic TX-49DX600 ranks No. 3947.
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the LG 55UF770 is 86%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 49UH610 is 94% (based on 20 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
6" smaller screen size Edit
The Panasonic TX-49DX600 has a screen size of 49" (as do the LG 49UF695 and the LG 49UH610), whereas the LG 55UF770 is a 55" TV (6" larger). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

One less USB 2.0 port Edit
The Panasonic TX-49DX600 is a one USB 2.0 port TV (as does the LG 49UH610), whereas the LG 55UF770 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

22% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Panasonic TX-49DX600 has an annual energy consumption of 117kWh, however the LG 49UF695 is a 126kWh annual energy consumption TV (9kWh higher), the LG 49UH610 is a 92kWh annual energy consumption TV (25kWh lower) and the LG 55UF770 is a 123kWh annual energy consumption TV (6kWh higher). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Thicker Edit
Panasonic TX-49DX600 is 66mm thick. That's 27.8mm thicker than the LG 49UF695 (66mm), 15.5mm thinner than the LG 49UH610 (66mm) and 9.3mm thicker than the LG 55UF770 (66mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

A lot heavier Edit
The Panasonic TX-49DX600 is a 16kg heavy TV, whereas the LG 49UF695 is a 17.5kg heavy TV (1.5kg heavier) and the LG 49UH610 is an 11.7kg heavy TV (4.3kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

More expensive by £49
The Panasonic TX-49DX600 is £49.01 more expensive than the LG 49UH610.
£34.86 more expensive to run over five years
The Panasonic TX-49DX600 costs £137.64 to run which is £34.86 more to run than the LG 49UH610 and £1.21 more to run than the LG 55UF770 over five years. Show assumptions.
Lower energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Panasonic TX-49DX600 is "A", however the rating of the LG 49UF695 is "A", the rating of the LG 49UH610 is "A+" and the rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+".

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 9 months Ago 20 months Ago 9 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 137.81
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 139.64
Purchase price £ 499.99
Total cost of ownership £ 639.63
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 100.95
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 102.78
Purchase price £ 449.99
Total cost of ownership £ 552.77
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 134.60
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 136.43
Purchase price £ 599.00
Total cost of ownership £ 735.43
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 134.60
Electricity cost - standby £ 3.04
Total running cost £ 137.64
Purchase price £ 499.00
Total cost of ownership £ 636.64
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.69T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.69 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.51T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.51 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.68T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.68 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.68T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.68 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
49" 49" 55"
BEST
49"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
3D Compatible
 3D compatible
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Backlighting
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 800Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 High Contrast
 High Contrast
 High Contrast
 High Contrast
Video Mode
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 14:9
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 14:9
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 14:9
 16:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 14:9
Picture Mastering Index (PMI)
1,200 1,200 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Dynamic Contrast Ratio (marketing Name)
 High Contrast
 High Contrast
 High Contrast
 High Contrast
Display Diagonal
123cm 123cm Unknown - Click to provide data 123cm
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Display Technology
 LED
BEST
 LED
BEST
 LED
 LED

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog

Smart TV

Smart TV Features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
 Smart TV features
Internet Browser
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
 Internet browser
Timeshift Feature
 Timeshift feature
 Timeshift feature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HbbTV
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HbbTV
Video App
 NetFlix
 NetFlix
 NetFlix
 NetFlix
Operating System Version
4.5 3.0 2.0 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS
Screen Mirroring
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Screen mirroring
My Home Screen
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 My Home Screen

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 20W 20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2 2
Built-In Speaker
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
Dolby Technology
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
Sound Mode
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
Audio Decoding Technology
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 1 1 1
Common Interface Plus
 Common interface plus
 Common interface plus
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface plus
Common Interface Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1 1 1
RF Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
SCART Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
RS-232 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
PC Audio in Port
 PC Audio in port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video in Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
1
USB 3.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
 DVI port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DVI port
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Version
 2.0
 2.0
BEST
 2.0
 2.0
PC in Port
 PC in port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC in port
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
3 3 3 3
Intel Wireless Display Technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
 Intel Wireless Display technology
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Consumer Electronics Control
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
1.3 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3

Networking

WiFi Connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
 WiFi connection
Internet Browser
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet browser
Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth Connection
 Bluetooth connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
WiFi Standard
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
BEST
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
Ethernet LAN Connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
 Ethernet LAN connection
Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
Unknown - Click to provide data
WiFi Direct Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 WiFi direct connection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Network Browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Network browsing
 Network browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data

Management Features

Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sleep timer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Smart Mode
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Dynamic
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Dynamic
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Dynamic
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Dynamic
On Screen Display
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On screen display
Electronic Programme Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Electronic programme guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Electronic programme guide
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display Language
 DAN
 DUT
 GRE
 EST
 SLV
 BUL
 SER
 CZE
 NOR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 LIT
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 CRO
 LAT
 MAC
 DAN
 DUT
 GRE
 EST
 SLV
 BUL
 SER
 CZE
 NOR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 LIT
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 CRO
 LAT
 MAC
 DAN
 DUT
 GRE
 EST
 SLV
 BUL
 SER
 CZE
 NOR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 LIT
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 CRO
 LAT
 MAC
 DAN
 DUT
 GRE
 EST
 SLV
 BUL
 SER
 CZE
 NOR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 LIT
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 TUR
 HUN
 CRO
 LAT
 MAC
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 34
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 27
Firmware Upgrade Method
 USB
 USB
 USB
 USB
Hotel Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Hotel mode
Programming Period
Unknown - Click to provide data 8 day(s) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Performance

Video Format
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 MP4
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 MP4
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 MP4
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 H.265
 MP4
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
Audio Format
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 RA-Lossless
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 DTS
 FLAC
 WAV
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 RA-Lossless
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 DTS
 FLAC
 WAV
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 RA-Lossless
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 DTS
 FLAC
 WAV
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 RA-Lossless
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 DTS
 FLAC
 WAV
Image Format
 JPG
 JPG
 JPG
 JPG
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Teletext function
Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Local Dimming
 Local dimming
 Local dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Local dimming
Processor Core
Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Stored Teletext Page
2,000 pages
BEST
2,000 pages
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,000 pages
USB Recording
Unknown - Click to provide data
 USB recording
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Subtitles Function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Subtitles function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Peak Luminance Ratio
65% 65% Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Power

Typical Power Consumption
86W 63W
BEST
84W 84W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
BEST
 A+
BEST
 A+
Annual Energy Consumption
126kWh 92kWh
BEST
123kWh 117kWh
Power Consumption When Switched Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data