* Monthly payments are estimates only and you should verify the finance payment amounts on the retailer's website.
Finance may not be available on this product and you should verify on the retailer's website whether finance options are available for the Panasonic TX-65CX410.
Credit is subject to eligibility. You will need to apply through the retailer's application process.
Our website is completely free for you to use but we may receive a commission from some of the companies we feature. How our site works.
19 Reasons For
Good Sound Quality
Several Panasonic TX-65CX410 owners who reviewed it considered that it had good sound quality. Difficult_guy wrote in their review on Amazon “This tv does not have a terrible sound”. Difficult_guy also said “Compare to size of TV (No Sub-woofer built in), I am already looking for a decent AV/Sound system score.6/10 Conclusion”. Dinesh Kunwar said “Sound is ok not even full smart tv”.
Several customers who purchased the product concluded that it was a bargain for the price. Amazon Customer said on Amazon “The design is of cheap poor quality”. D. J. Quinn wrote in their review of this TV on Amazon “No matter what you do to the picture settings broadcast television looks like a cheap Mexican soap opera” nonetheless they gave the product a rating of 3 stars. Difficult_guy said in their review on Amazon “All made of cheap plastic”.
Some Panasonic TX-65CX410 owners who bought the Panasonic TX-65CX410 reckoned that it was good value for money. Amazon Customer said in their Panasonic TX-65CX410 review in October “Future proof is a joke, I'd advise anyone to stay clear of this, invest a little bit extra and get something better for your money”. Ant Burke said on Amazon “TV is good value for money and the picture is very good”. Arista mentioned on Amazon last year “Its Great 4K LED 40" Great price” in their Panasonic TX-65CX410 review.
A number of customers mentioned in their reviews that this TV was cheap. D. J. Quinn mentioned “The speakers are pretty good for a budget flatscreen TV” but despite that they rated it 60 out of 100. D. J. Quinn also said “Beyond the panel the TV is noticeably budget”. Mr. Pw Bate wrote on Amazon in October last year “Admittedly this is still inexpensive compared to most 4K TVs so I was still a bit worried I'd encounter similar problems”.
Good Picture Quality
A few Panasonic TX-65CX410 reviewers who reviewed the Panasonic TX-65CX410 concluded that it had good picture quality. Difficult_guy wrote on Amazon “It has improved 3D picture quality” in their Panasonic TX-65CX410 review. Dinesh Kunwar wrote in their Panasonic TX-65CX410 review on Amazon “Cheap 4K TV and great picture quality that's all with this TV”. M. Whorley mentioned on Amazon “Brilliant Picture Quality at a Realistic Price”.
Good High Def TV
Eleven customers said that the Panasonic TX-65CX410 was good at displaying high definition TV. D. J. Quinn mentioned “I'm back on my old TV now and it looks great in comparison) External HD & online content looks better” in their Panasonic TX-65CX410 review. D. J. Quinn also said “Say you're better off spending the same money on a better quality HD TV instead”. Difficult_guy said in their review “Picture Quality, This tv offers excellent picture quality through HD sources and Netflix HD” although they only gave the product a score of 20 out of 100.
Good Product Quality
Nineteen customers who bought the product considered that it was good quality. Amazon Customer wrote on Amazon “The picture quality is exceptional” in their review of this TV. Amazon Customer also wrote “The picture quality is excellent, sound is a bit tinny, you will need a sound bar or surround system, if you only using external sources for content then fine.”. Carol Chapman mentioned in his review on Amazon “For the price I think it deserves consideration if your primary interest is in a good quality picture”.
Good Smart TV
Some people who bought the product agreed that it was good for watching on demand TV. In October last year Amazon Customer mentioned in their review of this TV “The picture quality on HD tv channel excellent and films on NETFLIX are stunning - sound bar required as the sound is poor”. D. J. Quinn said in the same month “I can't say for sure whether this is a problem with Netflix or the TV.”. Dinesh Kunwar gave the Panasonic TX-65CX410 a rating of 4 stars and said “It can be better if you add Apple TV, Jadoo tv box or android tv”.
One customer who reviewed it reckoned that it was good for watching TV catchup services.
One Panasonic TX-65CX410 owner considered that the product had great smart functions. This year B. King wrote “App's interface is also terrible so had to buy an Amazon Fire TV for better smart features” but they scored the product 40 out of 100.
One Panasonic TX-65CX410 reviewer who bought the Panasonic TX-65CX410 reckoned that it was good for watching YouTube on.
+14 More reasons for
Several Panasonic TX-65CX410 reviewers mentioned in their reviews that it was good looking. Kotko mentioned in their review in October last year “Colour accuracy and contrast are pretty ok though not perfect” however they scored it 3 stars. Mr P Thompson wrote in his review on Amazon last year “A nice looking TV” but even so he rated it 40 out of 100.
Several people who reviewed this TV agreed that it was a good design.
One customer who bought it concluded that it was smooth. Kotko wrote in their review of the Panasonic TX-65CX410 “Motion is far from smooth and I've tried a number of sources, from playing movies on Apple TV, Chromecast, Bluray etc”.
Good 3D Picture Quality
A number of Panasonic TX-65CX410 reviewers who bought this TV concluded that it had a good 3D picture quality. Difficult_guy said on Amazon “LG is much better software to handle 3d contents” in their review of this TV. John55 wrote a few weeks ago “The simulated 3d is fantastic, i have never watched BTTF in 3d before”.
Acceptable Noise Level
A few people who bought the Panasonic TX-65CX410 thought it was noisy. Arista wrote on Amazon “Then its good deal louder” in their review of the Panasonic TX-65CX410.
Two people who reviewed the Panasonic TX-65CX410 thought it was thin. D. J. Quinn wrote on Amazon “The bezel is commendably thin and it's the cheapest 4K TV right now” but even so they only gave this TV a score of 60 out of 100. Difficult_guy said “Design Its one of the latest slim line 4k LED/LCD tv with small bezel”.
One person said in their reviews that the product was thick.
Two Panasonic TX-65CX410 owners who reviewed this TV wrote that it was wifi compatible. M. Dosa wrote on Amazon “Straight out of the box i noticed loads of connectability which is great easy to set up, great wi fi connection, clear sound” in their review of the Panasonic TX-65CX410 and rated the product as very good. In October Tyke-Eng mentioned on Amazon “I connected to WiFi and was incredibly simple”.
Easy to Use
A number of customers who reviewed the product considered that it was easy to setup. Jhancke gave the Panasonic TX-65CX410 a rating of 5 stars and wrote in their review of this TV in October last year “The only problem I'm having is setting up the av controls for my Xbox one to switch it on”.
One customer mentioned in their reviews that it was easy to use. Tyke-Eng wrote a few weeks ago “An amazing feature that I didnt expects is that you can fully control the Fire TV product via the TV remote! The BBC iPlayer is really good” nonetheless they gave the product a rating of 40 out of 100.
A few Panasonic TX-65CX410 owners who reviewed it reckoned that it was well made. D. J. Quinn wrote in their Panasonic TX-65CX410 review on Amazon “Even with a solid 20Mb connection 4K content on Netflix breaks up when anything moves quickly” however despite that they scored this TV 3 stars. Difficult_guy mentioned on Amazon “This TV has quad core processor built in” in their review of the Panasonic TX-65CX410. Jhancke scored it 5 stars and mentioned in their review on Amazon in October last year “The built in speakers are good enough to match a good sound bars Obviously”.
One person mentioned in their reviews that the Panasonic TX-65CX410 had a good stand.
Panasonic Has Good Reviews for Its TVs
Based on 445 expert and user reviews, Panasonic has good reviews for its TVs. Panasonic also has good reviews specifically within its 4K and 8K TVs range.
Like most of the other TVs of a similar age and spec to the TX-65CX410, the Panasonic TX-65CX410 is 3D compatible.
We compared all the other 3D compatible TVs to this TV and we think the Panasonic TX-50AX802[plb_2285104_price], and the Samsung HU7500[plb_3366698_price] which has better reviews; or the Philips 55PUS7809[plb_2219819_price] which is cheaper are also worth considering.
Has a WiFi Connection
The TX-65CX410 has a WiFi connection. Most of the other TVs that came out around the same time as the TX-65CX410 also have a WiFi connection.
Other TVs with a WiFi connection currently available that you might also want to consider include the UE55HU7200[pl_2432088_price], or the HU7500[pl_3366698_price] both from Samsung or the Panasonic TX-50AX802[plb_2285104_price] which has better reviews.
Supports Smart TV Features
The Panasonic TX-65CX410 supports smart TV features. Most of the other TVs that were launched around the same time as the TX-65CX410 also support smart TV features.
We think you might also be interested in some of the alternative TVs which support smart TV features currently available including a cheaper TV such as the Philips 55PUS7809[plb_2219819_price] or you might consider a better rated TV such as the UE55HU7200[pl_2432088_price], or the HU7500[pl_3366698_price] both from Samsung.
2160p Video Mode
The TX-65CX410 supports a 2160p video mode which is better than most TVs of a similar age and spec to it. Most 4K and 8K TVs that were released more than two years ago support a 1080p video mode. This Panasonic TV also support 576i, 576p, 720i, 720p, 1080i and 1280p and 1520p video modes.
A 2160p video mode is actually the best supported video mode across all TVs of a comparable age and spec to the TX-65CX410.
The worst supported video mode amongst similar types of TV is 480p.
8 Reasons Against
Poor User Reviews
Based on 113 user reviews the average user rating of this Panasonic TV is 58 out of 100. It seems that users really don't rate this TV very highly.
Inferior Remote Control
A few customers wrote in their reviews that the product did not have a good remote control. Mr D J Thomas wrote on Amazon a few weeks ago “Poorly designed remote handset compared with true Panasonic”.
Inferior Technical Features
Some customers who bought the product considered that it did not have good features. B. King gave the product a score of 40 out of 100 and mentioned “Terrible picture quality and bad Smart features”. Lee Foster mentioned “The smart features are basic ( no usb recording function” although he still gave this TV a score of 4 stars.
Does Not Have a Built-In Camera
Like most of the other comparable spec televisions that have been available for more than two years, the TX-65CX410 does not have a built-in camera.
It is worth also looking at other televisions which also have a built-in camera including the Panasonic TX-58AX802[plb_2285175_price] which is also higher rated.
+5 More reasons against
Does Not Feature OLED Technology
The TX-65CX410 does not feature OLED technology. Most of the other televisions that were released more than two years ago also do not feature OLED technology.
There are a number of alternative TVs which also feature OLED technology which you might want to look at including the Samsung UE55HU7200[plb_2432088_price] which is also higher rated.
Only One HDMI Port
The Panasonic TX-65CX410 is a one HDMI port television. Most of the other televisions of this type and age have between one and four HDMI ports.
The thinnest thickness of TVs of a similar age and spec to the TX-65CX410 is 10mm, the thickest is 94mm, and the average thickness is 52mm. With a thickness of 65 millimeters, the Panasonic TX-65CX410 has a quite thick thickness compared to most of the other TVs of this spec and age.
If you would consider a TV with a thicker thickness then you might want to look at the LG 55UC970[plb_2479406_price] (72.1mm and higher rated), or the Panasonic TX-55AX630[plb_2507781_price] (62mm and higher rated); or the Samsung UE50HU6900[plb_2268258_price] (50.9mm and cheaper).
Very Slow Motion Interpolation Frequency
With a motion interpolation frequency of only 400 hertz, the TX-65CX410 has a fairly slow motion interpolation frequency compared to most of the other 4K and 8K TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as the TX-65CX410. The slowest motion interpolation frequency of comparable spec televisions that were released more than two years ago is 120Hz, the fastest is 3,000Hz, and the average motion interpolation frequency is 920Hz.
3 Other reasons to consider the Panasonic TX-65CX410
4K Ultra HD HD Type
The display resolution of this TV is 4K Ultra HD, which is typical of many televisions of a similar type and age to it. 4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.
4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.
OK Running Costs
This Panasonic television is rated A+ for energy efficiency. The TX-65CX410 has an average 5 year running cost of £190 based on average usage levels and energy prices, which is typical compared to the other 116 4K and 8K TVs that have been on the market for more than two years.
Released Over Three Years Ago
Panasonic released the TX-65CX410 over three years ago.
This Panasonic 3d tv was bought due to the great functionality it has to offer. The simulated 3d is fantastic,i have never watched BTTF in 3d before and it is superb to view in 3d, Audio is... Read more…
Bought this TV on a whim and it was a terrible mistake.
The design is of cheap poor quality, there is a thick chrome spary painted rim running around the edge of the screen that upon discovery... Read more…
Reviewed 12 March 2016 by Tonyteehee48 | 22 Comments
Don't buy it. Cheap crap as far as smart Tv's go. At first sky remote would not work with it. Only through Sky forum has a work around been found. Cannot get amazon prime loaded as not one of the... Read more…
Reviewed 12 February 2016 by Tyke-Eng | 11 Comments
I bought this TV at another reseller as they had some ex demo versions, but still a 5 year warranty
However I can see why they were selling them cheap, this TV is DREADFUL when using either Virgin... Read more…
Reviewed 3 February 2016 by Mr D J Thomas | 11 Comments
Product made by Vestel and not a true Panasonic. Performance clearly not up to true Panasonic standards. Set-up menus poor compared to all Panasonics up to date. Interaction / control with CEC... Read more…
Reviewed 21 January 2016 by Lee foster | 11 Comments
Don't be put off by most of the bad reviews for this TV! they must be talking about a different model. I brought this just before xmas and can confirm that for the price, this is the best 65" TV... Read more…
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Hide electricity usage and price
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Hide water usage and price
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Panasonic TX-65CX410uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.94 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 25 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.
Previous and future annual running costs of the Panasonic TX-65CX410 assuming future electricity price inflation of 0.0600% per year. Edit inflation assumptions