Close

Loading image...
Salora 24LED9102

Salora 24LED9102

24" Flat 61mm Dec 2014
Screen Size Screen Shape Thickness Release Date
A
£43.10 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

1 Reason For

Two USB 2.0 Ports

two USB 2.0 ports

The 24LED9102 is a two USB 2.0 port television.

Chart Edit

6 Reasons Against

Not 3D Compatible

The 24LED9102 is not 3D compatible. Most of the other TVs of a similar type and age to the 24LED9102 are also not 3D compatible.

Televisions which are 3D compatible that might be worth looking at include the Philips 22HFL2819 (£159.97).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Support Smart TV Features

Like most of the other TVs of a similar spec and age to the 24LED9102, the 24LED9102 does not support smart TV features.

Chart Edit

Does Not Have a WiFi Connection

The 24LED9102 does not have a WiFi connection, although it is worth keeping in mind that most of the other TVs of this spec and age also do not have a WiFi connection.

It is worth also looking at alternative televisions which also have a WiFi connection including the Panasonic TX-24CS500 (£149.99) which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

Most TVs that were released more than a year ago do not have a built-in camera. The Salora 24LED9102 is no exception to this as it too does not have a built-in camera.

Chart Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

The 24LED9102 does not feature OLED technology. Most of the other TVs of a comparable type and age to the 24LED9102 also do not feature OLED technology.

Chart Edit

Fairly Slow Response Time

The fastest response time of TVs of a similar age and type to the 24LED9102 is 4.5ms, the slowest is 14ms, and the average response time is 6.9ms. At 8.5 milliseconds, the 24LED9102 has a quite slow response time compared to most of the other TVs that were released one year ago.

Chart Edit

3 Other reasons to consider the Salora 24LED9102

Average Running Costs

This Salora TV is rated A for energy efficiency. Based on typical energy prices and usage levels we estimate that the 5 year running cost of the 24LED9102 is £44, which is typical compared to the other 88 TVs of this spec and age.

Released Over Two Years Ago

This television was released over two years ago.

Average Thickness

At 61 millimeters, the 24LED9102 has a pretty typical thickness compared to most of the other TVs of this type and age.

TVs with a thicker thickness that might also be worth looking at include the Finlux 28FLZ274 (65mm).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Specification

Display
Screen Size
HD Type
3D Compatible
Screen Shape
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Response Time
Display Brightness
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
Display Resolution
Aspect Ratio
Display Diagonal
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Graphics Resolution
Vertical Viewing Angle
TV Tuner
Digital Signal Format System
Smart TV
Audio
Built-In Subwoofer
RMS Rated Power
Loudspeaker
Built-In Speaker
Ports & Interfaces
Headphone Output Port
Digital Audio Coaxial Out Port
Common Interface Plus
Common Interface Connection
Ethernet LAN Port
RF Port
SCART Port
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
USB 2.0 Port
PC in Port
HDMI Port
VGA Port
Networking
Ethernet LAN Connection
Management Features
Performance
Teletext Function
Design
Colour
Ergonomics
VESA Mounting
Power
Typical Power Consumption
Standby Power Consumption
Energy Efficiency Class
Annual Energy Consumption
Certificates
DLNA Certificate
Ziggo Certified
Weight & Dimensions
Thickness
Weight (with Stand)
Height (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Height
Width
Packaging Height
Packaging Width
Packaging Content
Manual
Operational Conditions
Technical Details
Other Features
Special Features

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £40.06
Electricity cost when on standby £3.04
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £43.10
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Salora 24LED9102uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Energy Rating
0.21T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 6 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers salora 24led9102, salora 24led9102c, salora 24led9102cs
Barcodes 08718868053534

Save Money with These Great TV Vouchers & Offers

Save £200
Voucher
Save £200 on the Samsung HW-J6500R when you buy selected Samsung TVs
Valid 27 Oct 16 - 24 Dec 16
Save £200
Voucher
Save £200 on the Samsung HW-J7500R when you buy selected Samsung TVs
Valid 4 Oct 16 - 24 Dec 16
£75 Off
Voucher
£75 Off All TVs over £1000
Valid 24 Nov 16 - 15 Dec 16
£60 Off
Voucher
Save an extra £60 Off for an order over £700
Valid 30 Nov 16 - 13 Dec 16

See How Other TVs Compare to the Salora 24LED9102

Philips 22HFL2819 vs Salora 24LED9102

Philips 22HFL2819 vs Salora 24LED9102
Philips 22HFL2819 Salora 24LED9102
£ 159.97
Hugely Faster Response Time
7W Higher RMS Rated Power
Nine Months Newer
50% Lower Annual Energy Consumption
One Less HDMI Port
Only One USB 2.0 Port

Philips 28HFL5010 vs Salora 24LED9102

Philips 28HFL5010 vs Salora 24LED9102
Philips 28HFL5010 Salora 24LED9102
£ 348.89
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
50% Higher RMS Rated Power
100Hz Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Newer by Seven Months
One Less USB 2.0 Port

LG 24MT57 vs Salora 24LED9102

LG 24MT57 vs Salora 24LED9102
LG 24MT57 Salora 24LED9102
£ 159.99
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
50% Higher RMS Rated Power
Newer by Three Months
13% Cheaper to Run
One Less USB 2.0 Port
Slower Response Time
Feedback