Close

Loading image...
Salora 32LED9100
+ 1 Video

Salora 32LED9100

32" 100Hz Flat Feb 2015
Screen Size Refresh Rate Screen Shape Release Date
A
£68.74 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

2 Reasons For

Supports One Audio Format

The 32LED9100 has a greater number of audio formats than most televisions of this age and spec. This TV supports an MP3 audio format, which is the most commonly supported audio format supported by mid-size TVs that were launched around the same time as the 32LED9100.

Chart Edit

Quite Fast Response Time

With a response time of only 6.5 milliseconds, the Salora 32LED9100 has a fairly fast response time compared to most of the other TVs of a comparable spec and age to the 32LED9100. Across all the TVs of a comparable age and spec to the 32LED9100 the response times range from 4ms to 20ms, and the average response time is 8.5ms.

Chart Edit

9 Reasons Against

Does Not Support Smart TV Features

The Salora 32LED9100 does not support smart TV features, unlike most of the other TVs of this spec and age.

Other TVs which also support smart TV features that you might want to look at include the Philips 48PFH5500[plb_2861476_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a WiFi Connection

Most mid-size TVs that have been around for more than a year do not have a WiFi connection. The 32LED9100 is no exception to this as it too does not have a WiFi connection.

Chart Edit

Not 3D Compatible

Like most of the other mid-size TVs that have been around for a similar time to the 32LED9100, the 32LED9100 is not 3D compatible.

Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

Like most of the other mid-size TVs that have been on the market for a comparable time to the 32LED9100, the 32LED9100 does not have a built-in camera.

Chart Edit

Only Supports Four Analog Signal Format Systems

The number of analog signal format systems supported by the 32LED9100 is more than most televisions that are a comparable age to it. This TV supports a PAL analog signal format system, which is the most commonly supported analog signal format system supported by mid-size TVs that came out around the same time as the 32LED9100. The analog signal format systems "NTSC", "PAL BG" and "PAL DK" are also supported by this television.

Chart Edit

Only Supports Two Image Formats

The number of image formats supported by the 32LED9100 is more than most mid-size TVs that have been on the market for more than a year. This television supports a JPG image format, which is the most commonly supported image format supported by mid-size TVs that were launched around the same time as the 32LED9100. The image format "BMP" is also supported by this Salora TV.

Chart Edit

Only One HDMI Port

The Salora 32LED9100 is a one HDMI port television. Most of the other mid-size TVs that have been available for around the same time as the 32LED9100 have between one and three HDMI ports.

Chart Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

The 32LED9100 does not feature OLED technology, although keep in mind that most of the other mid-size TVs that were launched more than a year ago also do not feature OLED technology.

It is worth considering alternative televisions which also feature OLED technology including the Samsung UN50J6200[plb_2958294_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Very Low RMS Rated Power

With an RMS rated power of only 12 Watts, the Salora 32LED9100 has a fairly low RMS rated power compared to most of the other similar spec televisions that have been available for a comparable time to the 32LED9100. TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as the 32LED9100 have RMS rated power of between 5W and 1,000W.

Chart Edit

2 Other reasons to consider the Salora 32LED9100

Running Costs Are OK

The efficiency rating of this TV is A, and based on typical usage levels and energy prices we estimate that the 32LED9100 will cost £69 over 5 years to run, which is typical compared to the other 344 TVs of a similar age and spec.

Average Refresh Rate

At 100 hertz, the 32LED9100 has a relatively average refresh rate compared to most of the other comparable spec televisions that were released around the same time as the 32LED9100.

If you are looking for a faster refresh rate then you might want to consider the LG 49LX540[plb_2932682_price] (120Hz).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Specification

Display
Screen Size
HD Type
3D Compatible
Refresh Rate
Screen Shape
Response Time
Display Brightness
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
Display Resolution
Video Mode
Aspect Ratio
Display Diagonal
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Vertical Viewing Angle
TV Tuner
Channel
Digital Signal Format System
Tuner
TV Band
Analog Signal Format System
Smart TV
Smart TV Features
Internet Browser
Audio
RMS Rated Power
Loudspeaker
Built-In Speaker
Ports & Interfaces
Headphone Output Port
Digital Audio Coaxial Out Port
Common Interface Plus
Common Interface Connection
RF Port
SCART Port
USB 2.0 Port
DVI Port
PC in Port
HDMI Port
AV Input Port
VGA Port
Networking
WiFi Connection
Ethernet LAN Connection
Management Features
Sleep Timer
On Screen Display
Electronic Programme Guide
Performance
Video Format
Audio Format
Image Format
Teletext Function
Child Lock
Local Dimming
Design
Colour
Ergonomics
VESA Mounting
Power
Typical Power Consumption
Standby Power Consumption
Energy Efficiency Class
Annual Energy Consumption
Certificates
Ziggo Certified
UPC Certified
Weight & Dimensions
Packaging Content
Battery Included
Handheld Remote Control
Manual
Operational Conditions
Operating Temperature Range
Operating Relative Humidity Range
Technical Details
Other Features
Special Features

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £65.70
Electricity cost when on standby £3.04
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £68.74
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Salora 32LED9100uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Energy Rating
0.34T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.34 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 9 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers salora 32led9100, salora 32led9100c
Barcodes 08718868053473

Save Money with These Great TV Vouchers & Offers

Save £200
Voucher
Save £200 on the Samsung HW-J7500R when you buy selected Samsung TVs
Valid 4 Oct 16 - 24 Dec 16
Save £200
Voucher
Save £200 on the Samsung HW-J6500R when you buy selected Samsung TVs
Valid 27 Oct 16 - 24 Dec 16
£75 Off
Voucher
£75 Off All TVs over £1000
Valid 24 Nov 16 - 15 Dec 16
£60 Off
Voucher
Save an extra £60 Off for an order over £700
Valid 30 Nov 16 - 13 Dec 16

See How Other TVs Compare to the Salora 32LED9100

Philips 40PFT6510 vs Salora 32LED9100

Philips 40PFT6510 vs Salora 32LED9100
Philips 40PFT6510 Salora 32LED9100
£ 558.50
Four HDMI Ports
Two More USB 2.0 Ports
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
Higher RMS Rated Power
Does Not Have a PC in Port
Does Not Have a Common Interface Connection

Philips 40PFT6550 vs Salora 32LED9100

Philips 40PFT6550 vs Salora 32LED9100
Philips 40PFT6550 Salora 32LED9100
£ 399.00
Three More HDMI Ports
Three USB 2.0 Ports
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
8W Higher RMS Rated Power
Does Not Have a PC in Port
Does Not Have a Common Interface Connection

Samsung UE40JU7000 vs Salora 32LED9100

Samsung UE40JU7000 vs Salora 32LED9100
Samsung UE40JU7000 Salora 32LED9100
£ 699.00
Three More HDMI Ports
Three USB 2.0 Ports
Superior Energy Efficiency Rating
One More RF Port
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 45%
Higher Annual Energy Consumption
Feedback