Samsung UE43KU6510 + Samsung HWJ6502 Package Deal - SAM-UE43KU6510 + SAM-HWJ6502 Normally: £1148.00 Package saving: £100.00 £1048.00 Finance Options Home delivery available Store collection available In-store demonstration Delivery cost: FreeClick here to check stock in your areaClick here to find a demonstration in your areaSamsung UE43KU6510 Samsung UE43KU6510 reviews Samsung HWJ6502 Samsung HWJ6502 reviews RELATED PACKAGES Samsung UBDK8500 4K Blu-Ray Player + Samsung UE43KU6510 43" HDR Pro 4K
* Monthly payments are estimates only and you should verify the finance payment amounts on the retailer's website.
Finance may not be available on this product and you should verify on the retailer's website whether finance options are available for the Samsung UE43KU6510.
Credit is subject to eligibility. You will need to apply through the retailer's application process.
Our website is completely free for you to use but we may receive a commission from some of the companies we feature. How our site works.
7 Reasons For
Samsung has excellent average reviews for its mid-size TVs as well as across its entire TV range.
4K Ultra HD HD Type
The UE43KU6510 has a maximum display resolution of 4K Ultra HD. That's over four times the display resolution of a Full HD TV, which is the most frequently found display resolution. 4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.
This TV's display resolution (4K Ultra HD) is actually the best display resolution across all televisions that were launched in the last year.
Across similar types of TV the worst display resolution is HD Ready.
4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.
It may also be worth also looking at one of the alternative 4K Ultra HD TVs currently available including cheaper TVs such as the UE43KU6500[pl_3493438_price], or the UE49KU6100[pl_3539678_price] both from Samsung.
Only Released Six Months Ago
This television is one of the latest TVs to be released.
The UE43KU6510 is Smart TV, as are most of the other mid-size TVs that have been around for around the same time as the UE43KU6510.
We think you might also be interested in some of the alternative Smart TV televisions currently available including because of it's better review score, the LG 49UH668[plb_3349688_price].
If you want a TV that is Smart TV then you might want to look at the Samsung UE43KU6670[plb_3702841_price], or the LG 43UF6807[plb_3048766_price].
Has a WiFi Connection
Like most of the other latest comparable spec TVs, the UE43KU6510 has a WiFi connection.
There are a number of other TVs with a WiFi connection currently available which you might also want to look at including because of it's better review score, the LG 49UH668[plb_3349688_price].
Alternative televisions which also have a WiFi connection that you might also want to look at include the Samsung UE43KU6670[plb_3702841_price], or the LG 43UF6807[plb_3048766_price].
2160p Video Mode
The UE43KU6510 supports a 2160p video mode which is better than the 1080p video mode supported by most mid-size TVs that were released around the same time as it.
A 2160p video mode is actually the best supported video mode amongst all recently released mid-size TVs.
A 480i video mode is the worst supported video mode across comparable types of TV.
+2 More reasons for
Two RF Ports
The Samsung UE43KU6510 has more RF ports than most of the mid-size TVs that were released around the same time as the UE43KU6510. Most of the newly released mid-size TVs only have one RF port, however this television has two RF ports.
5 Reasons Against
Not 3D Compatible
The Samsung UE43KU6510 is not 3D compatible, although keep in mind that most of the other televisions that came out in the last year are also not 3D compatible.
Does Not Have a Built-In Camera
The UE43KU6510 does not have a built-in camera, although it is worth noting that most of the other mid-size TVs that came out around the same time as the UE43KU6510 also do not have a built-in camera.
Expensive for a New Mid-Size TV
We thought that this mid-size TV looks expensive compared to other comparable spec TVs that have been around for the last year. The cheapeast comparable spec TVs that have been around for the last year that we found costs £77 and the most expensive costs £1,599.
Only Supports Twelve Audio Formats
The Samsung UE43KU6510 has a greater number of audio formats than most comparable spec TVs that were launched around the same time as it. The most commonly supported audio format is AAC++, but this audio format is not supported by this Samsung television. The audio formats AAC, AIFF, APE, FLAC, M4A, MID, MIDI, MP3, MPA, OGG, WAV and WMA are also supported by this television.
+2 More reasons against
Does Not Feature OLED Technology
The UE43KU6510 does not feature OLED technology, although keep in mind that most of the other new mid-size TVs also do not feature OLED technology.
1 Other reason to consider the Samsung UE43KU6510
OK Running Costs
This mid-size TV is rated A for energy efficiency. The average 5 year running cost of the UE43KU6510 is £113 based on typical energy prices, which is typical compared to the other 332 mid-size TVs that were launched in the last year.
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Hide electricity usage and price
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Hide water usage and price
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Samsung UE43KU6510uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.56 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 15 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.
Previous and future annual running costs of the Samsung UE43KU6510 assuming future electricity price inflation of 0.0600% per year. Edit inflation assumptions