Close

Loading image...
Sharp LC-32LD166

Sharp LC-32LD166

32" Flat 64mm May 2014
Screen Size Screen Shape Thickness Release Date
The LD166 series is an HD-ready LED TV with exceptional picture quality. Active motion 100Hz ensures that fast-moving pictures are smotthly reproduced. The 2 HDMI inputs can take satellite boxes,... More
A
£65.68 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
PC World Business
Sharp LC-32LD166 from PC World Business
£265.18
Out of stock
Go to Store
ARMCO
£272.62
Out of stock
Go to Store
Report an incorrect price Found it cheaper elsewhere?
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

4 Reasons For

Low Running Costs

This Sharp television has an energy efficiency rating of A. The LC-32LD166 is one of the more economic to run TVs of this type and age that we have analysed for 5 year running costs. Based on typical energy prices and usage levels, we estimate the 5 year running cost of the LC-32LD166 is only £66.

Sharp TVs Have Good Reviews

On average Sharp mid-size TVs have good ratings compared to other brands as do all TVs built by Sharp.

Supports Three Analog Signal Format Systems

The number of analog signal format systems supported by the LC-32LD166 is more than most televisions of a similar age and type to it. This television supports an NTSC analog signal format system, which is the most commonly supported analog signal format system supported by TVs of a similar spec and age to the LC-32LD166. The analog signal format systems "PAL" and "SECAM" are also supported by this TV.

Chart Edit

Quite Low Annual Energy Consumption

The LC-32LD166 has a quite low annual energy consumption (only 58 kilowatt hours) compared to most of the other similar spec TVs that are a comparable age to the LC-32LD166. The annual energy consumptions of TVs of a comparable type and age to the LC-32LD166 range from 0.22kWh to 620kWh, and the average annual energy consumption is 76kWh.

Chart Edit

11 Reasons Against

Does Not Have a WiFi Connection

The LC-32LD166 does not have a WiFi connection, although it is worth noting that most of the other similar spec TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as the LC-32LD166 also do not have a WiFi connection.

We compared this TV to all the other televisions with a WiFi connection and we think the Panasonic TX-L32E30[plb_30112_price], the Samsung UE48H6470[plb_2240459_price], or the LG 47LB670[plb_2232214_price] which also has a higher rating is also worth considering.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Support Smart TV Features

Like most of the other TVs of a comparable age and type to the LC-32LD166, the LC-32LD166 does not support smart TV features.

It is worth also looking at alternative TVs which also support smart TV features including the Samsung UE40H6700[plb_2232461_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Not 3D Compatible

Most similar spec TVs that have been available for around the same time as the LC-32LD166 are not 3D compatible. The LC-32LD166 is no exception to this as it too is not 3D compatible.

Televisions which are 3D compatible that might also be worth considering include the LG 42LW579[plb_326450_price], or the Samsung UE40H6470[plb_2233881_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

Like most of the other mid-size TVs that have been around for a comparable time to the LC-32LD166, the LC-32LD166 does not have a built-in camera.

We compared this TV to all the other televisions with a built-in camera and we think the UE46ES8000[pl_1355897_price], the UN46ES8000[pl_1484430_price], or the UE40F7000[pl_1494094_price] all from Samsung which is also higher rated is also worth considering.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Very Low RMS Rated Power

The average RMS rated power of TVs of a comparable age and spec to the LC-32LD166 is 18W. With an RMS rated power of only 10 Watts, the Sharp LC-32LD166 has a fairly low RMS rated power compared to most of the other similar spec TVs that have been around for around the same time as the LC-32LD166.

Chart Edit

Only Analog Tuner

This television has an Analog & Digital tuner, which is typical of many televisions of this type and age.

Chart Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

The LC-32LD166 does not feature OLED technology, although keep in mind that most of the other similar spec TVs that are a comparable age to the LC-32LD166 also do not feature OLED technology.

There are a number of other TVs which also feature OLED technology that you might want to consider including the Samsung UE46H7000[plb_2232247_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Very Slow Motion Interpolation Frequency

The motion interpolation frequencies of televisions that are a comparable age to the LC-32LD166 range from 50Hz to 1,800Hz. The LC-32LD166 has one of the slower motion interpolation frequencies (only 100 hertz) amongst mid-size TVs of this age.

Chart Edit

Only Two HDMI Ports

The LC-32LD166 is a two HDMI port television. Most of the other TVs of this age and type have between one and four HDMI ports.

Chart Edit

Only One USB 2.0 Port

The LC-32LD166 is a one USB 2.0 port television.

Chart Edit

Only 1366 X 768 Pixels Display Resolution

The highest display resolution supported by the Sharp LC-32LD166 is 1366 x 768 pixels. That's 49% less display resolution than a 1920 x 1080 pixels television, which is the most common display resolution supported by mid-size TVs that have been available for around the same time as the LC-32LD166.

A 1366 x 768 pixels display resolution is actually the worst supported display resolution across all comparable spec TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as the LC-32LD166.

Across comparable types of TV the best supported display resolution is 1920 x 1080 pixels.

Read more Less Chart Edit

1 Other reason to consider the Sharp LC-32LD166

Average Thickness

With a thickness of 64 millimeters, the LC-32LD166 has a fairly standard thickness compared to most of the other mid-size TVs that came out more than two years ago.

Other 64mm thick TVs currently available which you might want to consider include the Philips 32PHT4509[plb_2227289_price] which has better reviews.

Other TVs with a thicker thickness that you might want to look at include the Philips 32PHK4309[plb_2237064_price] (64mm).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Specification

Display
Screen Size
HD Type
3D Compatible
Screen Shape
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Motion Interpolation Technology
Display Brightness
Display Resolution
Aspect Ratio
Display Diagonal
Graphics Resolution
TV Tuner
Digital Signal Format System
Tuner
Analog Signal Format System
Smart TV
Smart TV Features
Internet Browser
Audio
Built-In Subwoofer
RMS Rated Power
Loudspeaker
Built-In Speaker
Ports & Interfaces
Common Interface Plus
Common Interface Connection
Ethernet LAN Port
SCART Port
Component Video in Port
USB 2.0 Port
HDMI Version
HDMI Port
Audio Return Channel (ARC)
Networking
WiFi Connection
Bluetooth Connection
Ethernet LAN Connection
Management Features
Electronic Programme Guide
Performance
Teletext Function
Stored Teletext Page
Design
Colour
Ergonomics
VESA Mounting Interface
VESA Mounting
Power
Typical Power Consumption
Standby Power Consumption
Energy Efficiency Class
Annual Energy Consumption
Certificates
Weight & Dimensions
Thickness
Weight (with Stand)
Height (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Height
Width
Packaging Content
Handheld Remote Control
Operational Conditions
Technical Details
Other Features
Special Features

Brochures and Manuals

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £64.10
Electricity cost when on standby £1.58
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £65.68
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Sharp LC-32LD166uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Energy Rating
0.33T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 9 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

+- Manufacturer's Description

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers lc32ld166, lc32ld166k, LC-32LD166K, sharp p192465, sharp 32ld166, sharp 32ld166k, sharp p192465p, sharp lc32ld166, sharp lc32ld166k
Barcodes 04974019811239

Save Money with These Great TV Vouchers & Offers

Save £200
Voucher
Save £200 on the Samsung HW-J6500R when you buy selected Samsung TVs
Valid 27 Oct 16 - 24 Dec 16
Save £200
Voucher
Save £200 on the Samsung HW-J7500R when you buy selected Samsung TVs
Valid 4 Oct 16 - 24 Dec 16
£75 Off
Voucher
£75 Off All TVs over £1000
Valid 24 Nov 16 - 15 Dec 16
£60 Off
Voucher
Save an extra £60 Off for an order over £700
Valid 30 Nov 16 - 13 Dec 16

See How Other TVs Compare to the Sharp LC-32LD166

Sharp LC-42LE761 vs Sharp LC-32LD166

Sharp LC-42LE761 vs Sharp LC-32LD166
Sharp LC-42LE761 Sharp LC-32LD166
£ 299.00
Full HD
Higher Display Resolution
200Hz Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Two SCART Ports
£15.88 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
13kWh Higher Annual Energy Consumption

Samsung UE48H8000 vs Sharp LC-32LD166

Samsung UE48H8000 vs Sharp LC-32LD166
Samsung UE48H8000 Sharp LC-32LD166
£ 699.00
90% Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Three USB 2.0 Ports
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
Two More HDMI Ports
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 78%
Higher Annual Energy Consumption

TX-40CX802 vs LC-32LD166

Panasonic TX-40CX802 vs Sharp LC-32LD166
Panasonic TX-40CX802 Sharp LC-32LD166
£ 690.00
1,500Hz Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Two More USB 2.0 Ports
Newer by Eleven Months
50% Higher RMS Rated Power
£55.94 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
Worse Energy Efficiency Rating
Feedback