Bissell PowerForce vs Hoover Turbopower TP71 vs Kärcher MV 3 vs Shark Rocket PRO NV480

(17)
(81)
(50)
Bissell PowerForce
Hoover Turbopower TP71
Kärcher MV 3
Shark Rocket PRO NV480

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
eBay
Littlewoods
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Currys
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (10 available)
Littlewoods
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Tesco
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
ComWales
Delivery unknown
In stock
Anglia Tool Centre
Delivery unknown
In stock
Hughes
FREE Standard delivery
Amazon UK
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Tesco
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
4.1m longer cord length Edit
Bissell PowerForce is 8.1m power cord, but the Hoover Turbopower TP71 is only a 7m power cord vacuum cleaner (1.1m shorter), the Kärcher MV 3 is only a 4m power cord vacuum cleaner (4.1m shorter) and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is only an 8m power cord vacuum cleaner (0.1m shorter).
£1 cheaper
The Bissell PowerForce costs £54.99, whereas the Hoover Turbopower TP71 is £64.99, the Kärcher MV 3 is £55.04 and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is £64.99.
Available from 11 shops
The more retailers stock this vacuum cleaner, the greater competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
No data 3 Reasons For
Vastly higher maximum input power Edit
The Kärcher MV 3 has a maximum input power of 1,400W, however the Hoover Turbopower TP71 and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 are both only unknownW vacuum cleaners (1,400W lower).
Larger dust capacity Edit
The Kärcher MV 3 is a 17L dust capacity vacuum cleaner. That's 14L larger than the Hoover Turbopower TP71 (1.8L) and 15.2L larger than the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 (1.8L). Read more

The space that the product e.g. vacuum cleaner,vacuum cleaner bag has for dust.

A lot lighter Edit
The Kärcher MV 3 has a weight of 5.5kg, however the Hoover Turbopower TP71 is an 8.1kg heavy vacuum cleaner (2.6kg heavier) and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is a unknowng heavy vacuum cleaner (5.5kg lighter).
3 Reasons For
More popular
The Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 7635 by sales volume in our vacuum cleaners, whereas the Bissell PowerForce ranks No. 256451, the Hoover Turbopower TP71 ranks No. 487776 and the Kärcher MV 3 ranks No. 263722.
Four years longer manufacturer's guarantee
The manufacturer's guarantee provided with the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is five years, whereas it is one year for the Hoover Turbopower TP71.
User reviews are better
Based on 50 reviews, the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 has an average user review score of 90%, whereas the Bissell PowerForce has an average rating of 72% (based on 15 reviews), the Hoover Turbopower TP71 has an average rating of 81% (based on 81 reviews) and the Kärcher MV 3 has an average rating of 60% (based on 2 reviews).

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
Over two years older
The Bissell PowerForce is older than the Hoover Turbopower TP71 by 13 months and older than the Kärcher MV 3 by two years.
Worse selling
The Bissell PowerForce ranks No. 256451 by sales volume, but the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 ranks No. 7635.
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The Bissell PowerForce only has an average user rating of 72%, but the Hoover Turbopower TP71 has an average user rating of 81% (based on 81 reviews) and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 50 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
Five times smaller dust capacity Edit
The Hoover Turbopower TP71 has a dust capacity of 3L, whereas the Kärcher MV 3 is a 17L dust capacity vacuum cleaner (14L larger) and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is a 1.8L dust capacity vacuum cleaner (1.2L smaller). Read more

The space that the product e.g. vacuum cleaner,vacuum cleaner bag has for dust.

Shorter cord length Edit
Hoover Turbopower TP71 is only 7m power cord, but the Bissell PowerForce is an 8.1m power cord vacuum cleaner (1.1m longer), the Kärcher MV 3 is a 4m power cord vacuum cleaner (3m shorter) and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is an 8m power cord vacuum cleaner (1m longer).
Heavier Edit
Hoover Turbopower TP71 is 8.1kg heavy. That's 2.6kg heavier than the Kärcher MV 3 (unknowng) and 8.1kg heavier than the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 (unknowng).
£10 more expensive
The Hoover Turbopower TP71 is more expensive than the Bissell PowerForce by £10 and more expensive than the Kärcher MV 3 by £9.95.
Not as many stockists
Only 5 shops sells the Hoover Turbopower TP71, however 14 shops sell the Bissell PowerForce. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this vacuum cleaner remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over one year older
The Hoover Turbopower TP71 is older than the Kärcher MV 3 by 14 months.
Worse selling
The Hoover Turbopower TP71 ranks No. 487776 by sales volume, but the Bissell PowerForce ranks No. 256451, the Kärcher MV 3 ranks No. 263722 and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 ranks No. 7635.
Four months years shorter manufacturer's guarantee
The Hoover Turbopower TP71's manufacturer's guarantee is four years less than the Shark Rocket PRO NV480.
Lower user review Score
The Hoover Turbopower TP71 has an average user rating of 81%, but the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 50 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
Two times shorter cord length Edit
The Kärcher MV 3 has a cord length of 4m. That's 4.1m shorter than the Bissell PowerForce (8m), 3m shorter than the Hoover Turbopower TP71 (8m) and 4m shorter than the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 (8m).
More expensive by £1
The Kärcher MV 3 is £0.05 more expensive than the Bissell PowerForce.
Less retailers
The Kärcher MV 3 is only stocked by 5 shops, whereas the Bissell PowerForce is stocked by 14 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this vacuum cleaner remaining in stock.
Less popular
The Kärcher MV 3 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 263722 by number of sales in our vacuum cleaners, however the Bissell PowerForce ranks No. 256451 and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480 ranks No. 7635.
User review Rating is vastly Worse
The Kärcher MV 3's average user score is only 60%, however the Bissell PowerForce's is 72% (based on 15 reviews), the Hoover Turbopower TP71's is 81% (based on 81 reviews) and the Shark Rocket PRO NV480's is 90% (based on 50 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
9x smaller dust capacity Edit
The Shark Rocket PRO NV480 has a dust capacity of 1.8L, however the Hoover Turbopower TP71 is a 3L dust capacity vacuum cleaner (1.2L larger) and the Kärcher MV 3 is a 17L dust capacity vacuum cleaner (15.2L larger). Read more

The space that the product e.g. vacuum cleaner,vacuum cleaner bag has for dust.

0.1m shorter cord length Edit
The Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is an 8m power cord vacuum cleaner, whereas the Bissell PowerForce is an 8.1m power cord vacuum cleaner (0.1m longer), the Hoover Turbopower TP71 is a 7m power cord vacuum cleaner (1m shorter) and the Kärcher MV 3 is a 4m power cord vacuum cleaner (4m shorter).
£10 more expensive
The Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is more expensive than the Bissell PowerForce by £10 and more expensive than the Kärcher MV 3 by £9.95.
Fewer sellers
Only 3 retailers sells the Shark Rocket PRO NV480, but 14 shops sell the Bissell PowerForce, 5 retailers sell the Hoover Turbopower TP71 and 5 stores sell the Kärcher MV 3. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this vacuum cleaner, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Over two years older
The Shark Rocket PRO NV480 is older than the Bissell PowerForce by two months, older than the Hoover Turbopower TP71 by 15 months and older than the Kärcher MV 3 by two years.

Awards

1 Award
Howstuffworks.com: Best Buy
No awards found No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

47 months Ago 35 months Ago 20 months Ago 49 months Ago

Manufacturer's Warranty

No data 1 Year No data 5 Years

Energy Efficiency Class

No data
No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data No data

Power

Maximum Input Power
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1,400W Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A
 A
BEST
 A
 A
Current
12A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 27kWh Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Type
 Upright
 Upright
 Upright
 Upright
Dust Container
 Bagless
 Bagless
 Bagless
 Bagless
Dust Capacity
Unknown - Click to provide data 3L 17L
BEST
1.8L
Colour
 Black
 Blue
 Purple
 White
 Yellow
 Grey
 Orange
 Black
 Blue
 Purple
 White
 Yellow
 Grey
 Orange
 Black
 Blue
 Purple
 White
 Yellow
 Grey
 Orange
 Black
 Blue
 Purple
 White
 Yellow
 Grey
 Orange

Performance

Cleaning Type
 Wet
 Wet
 Wet
BEST
 Wet
Noise Level
Unknown - Click to provide data 89dB Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Intended Use
 Home
 Home
 Home
 Home
Hard Floor Cleaning Performance Class
 B
 B
BEST
 B
 B
Carpet Cleaning Performance Class
 C
 C
BEST
 C
 C
Dust Re-Emission Class
 G
 G
BEST
 G
 G
Cleaning Surface
 Hard floor
 Hard floor
 Hard floor
 Hard floor
Floor Surface
 Carpet
 Carpet
 Carpet
 Carpet

Ergonomics

Washable Filter
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Washable filter
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cord Length
8.1m
BEST
7m 4m 8m
Carrying Handle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Carrying handle
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 8.1kg 5.5kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 503mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 388mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 340mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Packaging Content

Brush Tool
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Brush tool
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Crevice Tool
 Crevice tool
 Crevice tool
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Special Feature
Unknown - Click to provide data Multi-cyclonic filtration Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 8.1kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1160 x 290 x 230
Feedback