AEG L99699 vs Hoover WDXA496A2 vs Indesit XWDA 751280 vs Samsung WD90J6410AW

AEG L99699
Hoover WDXA496A2
Indesit XWDA 751280
Samsung WD90J6410AW

Top Prices

No prices found
Currys
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (10 available)
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £36.58
In stock
Hughes
FREE Standard delivery
Amazon UK
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
Electrical Discount
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Peter Tyson Appliances
Delivery unknown
Simply Electricals
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
2kg larger washing capacity Edit
The AEG L99699 is a 9kg capacity washer dryer, and so do the Hoover WDXA496A2 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW. That's 2kg larger than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (9kg).
17% larger drying capacity Edit
The AEG L99699 is a 6kg drying capacity washer dryer, and so do the Hoover WDXA496A2 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW. That's 1kg larger than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (6kg). Read more

The total amount of clothes that can be put in the tumble dryer or washer/dryer in a single dry.

400 RPM higher maximum spin speed Edit
The AEG L99699 is a 1,600 RPM spin speed washer dryer. That's 200 RPM higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW (1,400 RPM) and 400 RPM higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (1,400 RPM).
Vastly lower washing & drying annual water consumption Edit
The AEG L99699 has a washing & drying annual water consumption of 13,800L, however the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 26,000L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer (12,200L higher) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is an 18,400L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer (4,600L higher).
Lower washing & drying annual energy consumption Edit
The AEG L99699 is a 734kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer. That's 236kWh lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 () and 218kWh lower than the Indesit XWDA 751280 ().
Larger drum volume Edit
The AEG L99699 is a 63L drum volume washer dryer. That's 11L larger than the Indesit XWDA 751280 ().
49% cheaper to run
Over five years the AEG L99699 is £1,278.64 cheaper to run than the Hoover WDXA496A2, £998.60 cheaper to run than the Indesit XWDA 751280 and £1,251.57 cheaper to run than the Samsung WD90J6410AW. Read more
Energy efficiency rating is better
The AEG L99699 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", however the Hoover WDXA496A2 has a rating of "A", the Indesit XWDA 751280 has a rating of "A" and the Samsung WD90J6410AW has a rating of "A".
5 Reasons For
23% larger washing capacity Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a washing capacity of 9kg (as do the AEG L99699 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW), however the Indesit XWDA 751280 is only a 7kg capacity washer dryer (2kg smaller).
Larger drying capacity Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a drying capacity of 6kg (as do the AEG L99699 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW), but the Indesit XWDA 751280 is only a 5kg drying capacity washer dryer (1kg smaller). Read more

The total amount of clothes that can be put in the tumble dryer or washer/dryer in a single dry.

Lower drying noise level Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a drying noise level of 51dB, but the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 59dB drying noise level washer dryer (8dB higher) and the Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 62dB drying noise level washer dryer (11dB higher).
Lower annual water consumption when washing Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has an annual water consumption when washing of 9,800L, but the Indesit XWDA 751280 is an 11,800L annual water consumption when washing washer dryer (2,000L higher).
Higher energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Hoover WDXA496A2 is "A", but the rating of the AEG L99699 is "A", the rating of the Indesit XWDA 751280 is "A" and the rating of the Samsung WD90J6410AW is "A".
7 Reasons For
7dB lower wash noise level Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a wash noise level of 54dB (as does the Samsung WD90J6410AW), whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 61dB wash noise level washer dryer (7dB higher).
Thirteen more washing programs Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 16.00 washing program washer dryer, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 only has three washing programs. Read more

We do not know the number of washing programs on the AEG L99699 or the Samsung WD90J6410AW. It is possible that they do not have any washing programs.

19% lower connected load Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a connected load of 1,850W, however the AEG L99699 is a 2,200W connected load washer dryer (350W higher).
18kWh lower annual energy consumption when washing Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has an annual energy consumption when washing of 210kWh, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 228kWh annual energy consumption when washing washer dryer (18kWh higher).
61% lower per cycle energy consumption when washing Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 1.05kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer. That's 0.64kWh lower than the AEG L99699 () and 0.09kWh lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 ().
£86 cheaper
The Indesit XWDA 751280 costs £125.99 less than the AEG L99699, costs £85.99 less than the Hoover WDXA496A2 and costs £275 less than the Samsung WD90J6410AW.
Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Indesit XWDA 751280 is "A", however the rating of the AEG L99699 is "A", the rating of the Hoover WDXA496A2 is "A" and the rating of the Samsung WD90J6410AW is "A".
8 Reasons For
Larger washing capacity Edit
Samsung WD90J6410AW is 9kg capacity, and so do the AEG L99699 and the Hoover WDXA496A2. That's 2kg larger than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (9kg).
1kg larger drying capacity Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 6kg drying capacity washer dryer, and so do the AEG L99699 and the Hoover WDXA496A2. That's 1kg larger than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (6kg). Read more

The total amount of clothes that can be put in the tumble dryer or washer/dryer in a single dry.

7dB lower spin noise level Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AW has an spin noise level of 73dB, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 78dB spin noise level washer dryer (5dB higher) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is an 80dB spin noise level washer dryer (7dB higher).
Lower wash noise level Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 54dB wash noise level washer dryer, and so does the Indesit XWDA 751280. That's 7dB lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (54dB).
Two times shorter washing cycle time Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 59 min washing cycle time washer dryer. That's 71 min shorter than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (59 min) and 111 min shorter than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (59 min).
15 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this washer dryer remaining in stock.
Better selling
The Samsung WD90J6410AW ranks No. 6318 by number of sales, whereas the Indesit XWDA 751280 ranks No. 43714.
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Samsung WD90J6410AW has an energy efficiency rating of "A", whereas the AEG L99699 has a rating of "A", the Hoover WDXA496A2 has a rating of "A" and the Indesit XWDA 751280 has a rating of "A".

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
16% higher connected load Edit
The AEG L99699 is a 2,200W connected load washer dryer. That's 350W higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 ().
A lot higher per cycle energy consumption when washing Edit
The AEG L99699 has a per cycle energy consumption when washing of 1.69kWh, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 1.14kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer (0.55kWh lower) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 1.05kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer (0.64kWh lower).
More expensive by £126
The AEG L99699 is £40 more expensive than the Hoover WDXA496A2 and £125.99 more expensive than the Indesit XWDA 751280.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by eleven months
The AEG L99699 is eleven months older than the Samsung WD90J6410AW.
13 Reasons Against
Higher spin noise level Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 78dB spin noise level washer dryer. That's 2dB lower than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (73dB) and 5dB higher than the Samsung WD90J6410AW (73dB).
12% higher wash noise level Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a wash noise level of 61dB, however the Indesit XWDA 751280 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW are both 54dB wash noise level washer dryers (7dB lower).
Thirteen less washing programs Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has three washing programs, however the Indesit XWDA 751280 only has 16.00 washing programs. Read more

We do not know the number of washing programs on the AEG L99699 or the Samsung WD90J6410AW. It is possible that they do not have any washing programs.

15% lower maximum spin speed Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a maximum spin speed of 1,400 RPM (as does the Samsung WD90J6410AW), however the AEG L99699 is a 1,600 RPM spin speed washer dryer (200 RPM higher) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 1,200 RPM spin speed washer dryer (200 RPM lower).
71 min longer washing cycle time Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a washing cycle time of 130 min, whereas the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 170 min washing cycle time washer dryer (40 min longer) and the Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 59 min washing cycle time washer dryer (71 min shorter).
47% higher washing & drying annual water consumption Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 26,000L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer. That's 12,200L higher than the AEG L99699 () and 7,600L higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 ().
236kWh higher washing & drying annual energy consumption Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a washing & drying annual energy consumption of 970kWh, whereas the AEG L99699 is a 734kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer (236kWh lower) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 952kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer (18kWh lower).
18kWh higher annual energy consumption when washing Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has an annual energy consumption when washing of 228kWh, however the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 210kWh annual energy consumption when washing washer dryer (18kWh lower).
8% higher per cycle energy consumption when washing Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 1.14kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer. That's 0.55kWh lower than the AEG L99699 () and 0.09kWh higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 ().
£86 more expensive
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is more expensive than the Indesit XWDA 751280 by £85.99.
Not as many stockists
Only 1 seller sell the Hoover WDXA496A2, however 16 retailers sell the Samsung WD90J6410AW. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this washer dryer remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over one year older
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is older than the AEG L99699 by five months and older than the Samsung WD90J6410AW by 16 months. The Hoover WDXA496A2 is the same age as the Indesit XWDA 751280.
More expensive to run over five years by 95%
The running costs of the Hoover WDXA496A2 are £2,627.75 which is £1,278.64 more than the AEG L99699, £280.04 more than the Indesit XWDA 751280 and £27.07 more than the Samsung WD90J6410AW over five years. Show assumptions.
14 Reasons Against
A lot smaller washing capacity Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 7kg capacity washer dryer, whereas the AEG L99699, the Hoover WDXA496A2 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW are all 9kg capacity washer dryers (2kg larger).
20% smaller drying capacity Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a drying capacity of 5kg, however the AEG L99699, the Hoover WDXA496A2 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW are all 6kg drying capacity washer dryers (1kg larger). Read more

The total amount of clothes that can be put in the tumble dryer or washer/dryer in a single dry.

14% higher drying noise level Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a drying noise level of 59dB, however the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 51dB drying noise level washer dryer (8dB lower) and the Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 62dB drying noise level washer dryer (3dB higher).
Higher spin noise level Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is an 80dB spin noise level washer dryer. That's 2dB higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (73dB) and 7dB higher than the Samsung WD90J6410AW (73dB).
400 RPM lower maximum spin speed Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 1,200 RPM spin speed washer dryer, whereas the AEG L99699 is a 1,600 RPM spin speed washer dryer (400 RPM higher) and the Hoover WDXA496A2 and the Samsung WD90J6410AW are both 1,400 RPM spin speed washer dryers (200 RPM higher).
111 min longer washing cycle time Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a washing cycle time of 170 min, but the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 130 min washing cycle time washer dryer (40 min shorter) and the Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 59 min washing cycle time washer dryer (111 min shorter).
25% higher washing & drying annual water consumption Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is an 18,400L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer. That's 4,600L higher than the AEG L99699 () and 7,600L lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 ().
Higher washing & drying annual energy consumption Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a washing & drying annual energy consumption of 952kWh, but the AEG L99699 is a 734kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer (218kWh lower) and the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 970kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer (18kWh higher).
17% higher annual water consumption when washing Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has an annual water consumption when washing of 11,800L, however the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 9,800L annual water consumption when washing washer dryer (2,000L lower).
Smaller drum volume Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a drum volume of 52L, but the AEG L99699 is a 63L drum volume washer dryer (11L larger).
Less retailers
Only 1 store sell the Indesit XWDA 751280, whereas 16 stores sell the Samsung WD90J6410AW. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this washer dryer and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over one year older
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is older than the AEG L99699 by five months and older than the Samsung WD90J6410AW by 16 months. The Indesit XWDA 751280 is the same age as the Hoover WDXA496A2.
More expensive to run over five years by 74%
The running costs of the Indesit XWDA 751280 are £2,347.71 which is £998.60 more than the AEG L99699 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Indesit XWDA 751280 ranks No. 43714 by sales volume, however the Samsung WD90J6410AW ranks No. 6318.
4 Reasons Against
11dB higher drying noise level Edit
The Samsung WD90J6410AW is a 62dB drying noise level washer dryer. That's 11dB higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (62dB) and 3dB higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (62dB).
Lower maximum spin speed Edit
Samsung WD90J6410AW is only 1,400 RPM spin speed, and so does the Hoover WDXA496A2. That's 200 RPM lower than the AEG L99699 (1,400 RPM) and 200 RPM higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (1,400 RPM).
More expensive by £275
The Samsung WD90J6410AW is £149.01 more expensive than the AEG L99699, £189.01 more expensive than the Hoover WDXA496A2 and £275 more expensive than the Indesit XWDA 751280.
Higher running costs over five years by £1,251.57
The Samsung WD90J6410AW costs £2,600.68 to run which is £1,251.57 more to run than the AEG L99699 and £252.97 more to run than the Indesit XWDA 751280 over five years. Show assumptions.

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

29 months Ago 35 months Ago 34 months Ago 19 months Ago

Manufacturer's Warranty

No data 1 Year No data No data

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 1,349.11
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ -
Total running cost £ 1,349.11
Purchase price £ 429.99
Total cost of ownership £ 1,779.10
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 1,782.88
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ 844.87
Total running cost £ 2,627.75
Purchase price £ 389.99
Total cost of ownership £ 3,017.74
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 1,749.80
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ 597.91
Total running cost £ 2,347.71
Purchase price £ 304.00
Total cost of ownership £ 2,651.71
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 2,249.74
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ 350.94
Total running cost £ 2,600.68
Purchase price £ 579.00
Total cost of ownership £ 3,179.68
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

6.7T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 6.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
172
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
8.9T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 8.9 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
227
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
901 baths
Running this washer dryer over over 10 years will use 243,000 litres of water. That's the same as having 901 baths.
8.7T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 8.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
223
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
637 baths
Running this washer dryer over over 10 years will use 172,000 litres of water. That's the same as having 637 baths.
11T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 11 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
286
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
374 baths
Running this washer dryer over over 10 years will use 101,000 litres of water. That's the same as having 374 baths.

Performance

Washing Capacity
9kg
BEST
9kg
BEST
7kg 9kg
BEST
Drying Capacity
6kg
BEST
6kg
BEST
5kg 6kg
BEST
Load Balancing System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Load balancing system
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Drying Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 12 Unknown - Click to provide data
Drying Noise Level
Unknown - Click to provide data 51dB
BEST
59dB 62dB
Spin Noise Level
Unknown - Click to provide data 78dB 80dB 73dB
BEST
Wash Noise Level
Unknown - Click to provide data 61dB 54dB
BEST
54dB
BEST
Adjustable Spin Speed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Adjustable spin speed
 Adjustable spin speed
Unknown - Click to provide data
Delayed Start Timer
 Delayed start timer
 Delayed start timer
 Delayed start timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
Residual Moisture Level
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 53% Unknown - Click to provide data
Washing Program
 Cold
 baby
 Hand/wool
 Pre-wash
 Intensive/outdoor
 Sport
 Cotton
 Synthetics
 Baby care
 Cold
 baby
 Hand/wool
 Pre-wash
 Intensive/outdoor
 Sport
 Cotton
 Synthetics
 Baby care
 Cold
 baby
 Hand/wool
 Pre-wash
 Intensive/outdoor
 Sport
 Cotton
 Synthetics
 Baby care
 Cold
 baby
 Hand/wool
 Pre-wash
 Intensive/outdoor
 Sport
 Cotton
 Synthetics
 Baby care
BEST
Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data 3 16 Unknown - Click to provide data
Drying Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
 B
BEST
 B
Washing Energy Efficiency Class
 A
BEST
 A
 A
BEST
 A
BEST
Minimum Spin Speed
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 600 RPM Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Spin Speed
1,600 RPM
BEST
1,400 RPM 1,200 RPM 1,400 RPM
Washing & Drying Cycle Time
Unknown - Click to provide data 59 min Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Washing Cycle Time
Unknown - Click to provide data 130 min 170 min 59 min
BEST

Other Features

Spin-Drying Class
 A
 A
 A
 A

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A
 A
 A
 A
Washing & Drying Energy Consumption
3.67kWh
BEST
4.85kWh 4.76kWh 6.12kWh
Washing & Drying Water Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 130L 92L
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Water Consumption When Washing
Unknown - Click to provide data 49L
BEST
59L 54L
Connected Load
2,200W Unknown - Click to provide data 1,850W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Washing & Drying Annual Water Consumption
13,800L
BEST
26,000L 18,400L Unknown - Click to provide data
Washing & Drying Annual Energy Consumption
734kWh
BEST
970kWh 952kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Water Consumption When Washing
Unknown - Click to provide data 9,800L
BEST
11,800L Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption When Washing
Unknown - Click to provide data 228kWh 210kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Per Cycle Energy Consumption When Washing
1.69kWh 1.14kWh 1.05kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 230
 230
 230
 230
Current
10A Unknown - Click to provide data 10A Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
 50

Ergonomics

Child Lock
 Child lock
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Child lock
Remaining Time Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Remaining time indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.7m Unknown - Click to provide data
Sensor Program Selection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sensor program selection
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Loading Type
 Front-load
 Front-load
 Front-load
 Front-load
Door Hinge
 Left
 Left
 Left
 Left
Colour
 White
 White
 White
 White
Drum Volume
63L
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 52L Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Window
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Viewing window
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Built-In Display
 Built-in display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in display
 Built-in display
Control Type
 Rotary
 Buttons
 Rotary
 Buttons
 Rotary
 Buttons
 Rotary
 Buttons
Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Reversible Door
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Reversible door
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Height
870mm 850mm 850mm 850mm
Width
600mm 600mm 595mm 600mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 73kg 66.5kg
BEST
70kg
Depth
639mm 540mm 540mm 650mm
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 890mm 890mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 600mm 590mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 650mm 645mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data

Drying Programs

Synthetics Drying Program
 Synthetics drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Synthetics drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cotton Drying Program
 Cotton drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cotton drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data
Wool Drying Program
 Wool drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wool drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data

Washing Programs

Synthetics Washing Program
 Synthetics washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Synthetics washing program
 Synthetics washing program
Sport Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sport washing program
 Sport washing program
Quick Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pre-Wash Program
 Pre-wash program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pre-wash program
Intensive/outdoor Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Intensive/outdoor washing program
Hand/wool Washing Program
 Hand/wool washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Hand/wool washing program
 Hand/wool washing program
Eco Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Eco washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
Delicate/silk Washing Program
 Delicate/silk washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Delicate/silk washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cotton Washing Program
 Cotton washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cotton washing program
 Cotton washing program
Black Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Black washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
Baby Care Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Baby care washing program
Feedback