Fifteen people mentioned in their reviews that this digital camera was able to produce good images. Pcmag-Mideast.com said “Superb image capturing” in their Canon 1D Mark IV review. Dp Review wrote on DP Review “Highly detailed 16MP images in a wide range of conditions” in their review of this digital camera however despite that they scored this digital camera 14 out of 100. Pcmag-Mideast.com also mentioned “The better the image quality” in their review.
Ten owners said in their reviews that the product had a good picture resolution. Digitalcamerareview.com said “Fast continuous shooting rate” in their review of this digital camera although they rated this digital camera 1 stars. Pdnonline.com said in their review of this digital camera “Increased resolution helps for better cropping” . Pdnonline.com also wrote “10 frames per second shooting speed is still best in class” in their review.
Six customers said in their reviews that the product had a good ISO range. Pcmag-Mideast.com said “High ISO speeds” but in spite of that they only gave the product a rating of 1 stars. Seven years ago Digitalcamerareview.com mentioned “Wide range of ISO sensitivities” in their review of this digital camera however despite that they gave it a score of 1 stars. Layersmagazine.com mentioned “Insanely high ISOs” but despite that they only gave it a score of 1 stars.
Four people who reviewed this digital camera considered that it had a good image sensor. Techradar.com/au/ said in their review of this digital camera “Fullframe sensor”. Imaging Resource.com said “Dust removal technology reduces sensor cleaning chores”.
One owner who bought it concluded that it was good in low light. Amateurphotographer.co.uk gave it a score of 7 stars and mentioned “The AF system performs well, even in low light, although it is worth paying for fast lenses that get the best from it”.