Several customers mentioned in their reviews that the product was good value for money. Six years ago Whatdigitalcamera.com said in their Nikon Coolpix S2500 review on expert review site What Digital Camera “Where once you'd struggle to purchase anything respectable around that price, there are now a host of models vying for pole position”. Ephotozine.com mentioned on expert website Ephotozine in the same month “The Coolpix S2500 represents good value for money although for just £111 you can get the Coolpix S3100 which has more megapixels, longer optical zoom”. Digicambuyer.co.uk scored this digital camera 80 out of 100 and said in their Nikon Coolpix S2500 review on expert website Digicam Buyer.co.uk also six years ago “A good-looking camera that’s refreshingly slim, light and good value for money”.
Some customers who purchased this digital camera considered that it was cheap. Photographyblog.com mentioned in their review six years ago “The Nikon Coolpix S2500 is a budget digicam with a sense of style thanks to its all-metal body”. Also six years ago Cnet.co.uk said on CNET.co.uk “Nowadays, many big-name manufacturers are coming up with low-cost cameras that don't skimp on performance or features”. Also six years ago expert website Pocket-Lint.com said in their Nikon Coolpix S2500 review “The Nikon Coolpix S2500 is a 12.1-megapixel budget compact with a slender 20mm body”.
A few Nikon Coolpix S2500 owners concluded that the Nikon Coolpix S2500 was a bargain for the price. Ephotozine wrote “Cheap, in-camera Colour Options”. Cnet.com.au gave the Nikon Coolpix S2500 a rating of 4 stars and said on expert review site CNET.com.au “Amidst the influx of cheap compact cameras here at CNET of late - see the”. Cnet.com.au also said “The S2500 is a respectable cheap compact that loses marks for its basic feature set”.