Samsung RR35H6110WW vs Samsung RR35H66107F vs Samsung RR35H6610SA vs Samsung RR3773ATC

Samsung RR35H6110WW
Samsung RR35H66107F
Samsung RR35H6610SA
Samsung RR3773ATC

Top Prices

Hughes
Checked 3 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
StarServiceUK
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
DR Electrical
Checked 11 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon UK
Checked 1 hour ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Boots Kitchen Appliances
Checked 4 hours ago
Standard delivery: £19.99
In stock
Next Domestic Appliances
Checked 23 hours ago
Standard delivery: £19.99
In stock
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Standard delivery: £60.00
Appliance Electronics
Checked 12 hours ago
Out of stock
JC Campbell
Checked 11 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
One more fridge number of shelves/baskets Edit
The Samsung RR35H6110WW has six fridge number of shelves/basketss (as does the Samsung RR3773ATC), however the Samsung RR35H6610SA only has five fridge number of shelves/basketss.
1% bigger fridge net capacity Edit
Samsung RR35H6110WW is 350L net capacity, and so do the Samsung RR35H6610SA and the Samsung RR3773ATC. That's 2L bigger than the Samsung RR35H66107F (350L).
2L bigger fridge gross capacity Edit
Samsung RR35H6110WW is 355L gross capacity (as does the Samsung RR35H6610SA), but the Samsung RR35H66107F is only a 353L gross capacity fridge (2L smaller).
2L larger total gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RR35H6110WW has a total gross capacity of 355L (as does the Samsung RR35H6610SA), whereas the Samsung RR35H66107F is only a 353L total gross capacity fridge (2L smaller).
2 Reasons For
Reversible doors Edit
The Samsung RR35H66107F has a reversible doors, and so does the Samsung RR35H6610SA, whereas the Samsung RR3773ATC does not have a reversible doors.
5 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
5 Reasons For
Reversible doors Edit
The Samsung RR35H6610SA has a reversible doors (as does the Samsung RR35H66107F), however the Samsung RR3773ATC does not have a reversible doors.
1% bigger fridge net capacity Edit
The Samsung RR35H6610SA is a 350L net capacity fridge, and so do the Samsung RR35H6110WW and the Samsung RR3773ATC. That's 2L bigger than the Samsung RR35H66107F (350L).
2L bigger fridge gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RR35H6610SA is a 355L gross capacity fridge (as does the Samsung RR35H6110WW), whereas the Samsung RR35H66107F is only a 353L gross capacity fridge (2L smaller).
2L larger total gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RR35H6610SA has a total gross capacity of 355L (as does the Samsung RR35H6110WW), however the Samsung RR35H66107F is only a 353L total gross capacity fridge (2L smaller).
£71 cheaper
The Samsung RR35H6610SA is £70.99 cheaper than the Samsung RR35H6110WW, £347 cheaper than the Samsung RR35H66107F and £470.99 cheaper than the Samsung RR3773ATC.
3 Reasons For
One more fridge number of shelves/baskets Edit
The Samsung RR3773ATC is a six fridge number of shelves/baskets fridge (as does the Samsung RR35H6110WW), whereas the Samsung RR35H6610SA only has five fridge number of shelves/basketss.
Bigger fridge net capacity Edit
The Samsung RR3773ATC has a fridge net capacity of 350L, and so do the Samsung RR35H6110WW and the Samsung RR35H6610SA. That's 2L bigger than the Samsung RR35H66107F (350L).
Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Samsung RR3773ATC is "A++", however the rating of the Samsung RR35H6110WW is "A+", the rating of the Samsung RR35H66107F is "A+" and the rating of the Samsung RR35H6610SA is "A+".

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
£71 more expensive
The Samsung RR35H6110WW is more expensive than the Samsung RR35H6610SA by £70.99.
Not as many stockists
Only 3 stores sells the Samsung RR35H6110WW, however 6 retailers sell the Samsung RR35H66107F. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this fridge remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Energy efficiency rating is inferior
The Samsung RR35H6110WW has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", but the Samsung RR35H66107F has a rating of "A+", the Samsung RR35H6610SA has a rating of "A+" and the Samsung RR3773ATC has a rating of "A++".
6 Reasons Against
Only five fridge number of shelves/basketss Edit
The Samsung RR35H66107F has five fridge number of shelves/basketss, and so does the Samsung RR35H6610SA, however the Samsung RR3773ATC only has six fridge number of shelves/basketss.
2L smaller fridge net capacity Edit
Samsung RR35H66107F is only 348L net capacity, but the Samsung RR35H6110WW, the Samsung RR35H6610SA and the Samsung RR3773ATC are all 350L net capacity fridges (2L bigger).
Smaller fridge gross capacity Edit
Samsung RR35H66107F is only 353L gross capacity. That's 2L smaller than the Samsung RR35H6110WW and the Samsung RR35H6610SA ().
Smaller total gross capacity Edit
The Samsung RR35H66107F is a 353L total gross capacity fridge. That's 2L smaller than the Samsung RR35H6110WW and the Samsung RR35H6610SA ().
More expensive by £347
The Samsung RR35H66107F is £276.01 more expensive than the Samsung RR35H6110WW and £347 more expensive than the Samsung RR35H6610SA.
Inferior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Samsung RR35H66107F is "A+", but the rating of the Samsung RR35H6110WW is "A+", the rating of the Samsung RR35H6610SA is "A+" and the rating of the Samsung RR3773ATC is "A++".
3 Reasons Against
One less fridge number of shelves/baskets Edit
The number of fridge number of shelves/basketss on the Samsung RR35H6610SA is five (as does the Samsung RR35H66107F), but the Samsung RR3773ATC only has six fridge number of shelves/basketss.
Fewer sellers
Only 2 sellers sells the Samsung RR35H6610SA, but 3 shops sell the Samsung RR35H6110WW and 6 stores sell the Samsung RR35H66107F. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this fridge, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Energy efficiency rating is worse
The Samsung RR35H6610SA has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the Samsung RR35H6110WW has a rating of "A+", the Samsung RR35H66107F has a rating of "A+" and the Samsung RR3773ATC has a rating of "A++".
4 Reasons Against
Does not have a reversible doors Edit
The Samsung RR3773ATC does not have a reversible doors, whereas the Samsung RR35H66107F and the Samsung RR35H6610SA have a reversible doors.
£471 more expensive
The Samsung RR3773ATC is more expensive than the Samsung RR35H6110WW by £400, more expensive than the Samsung RR35H66107F by £123.99 and more expensive than the Samsung RR35H6610SA by £470.99.
Less retailers
Only 1 store sell the Samsung RR3773ATC, whereas 3 retailers sell the Samsung RR35H6110WW, 6 sellers sell the Samsung RR35H66107F and 2 retailers sell the Samsung RR35H6610SA. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this fridge and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Eleven months older
The Samsung RR3773ATC is older than the Samsung RR35H6110WW by eleven months, older than the Samsung RR35H66107F by eleven months and older than the Samsung RR35H6610SA by eleven months.

Date Released

43 months Ago 43 months Ago 43 months Ago 54 months Ago

Manufacturer's Warranty

2 Years 2 Years 2 Years No data

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 336.05
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 336.05
Purchase price £ 399.99
Total cost of ownership £ 736.04
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 336.05
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 336.05
Purchase price £ 676.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,012.05
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 336.05
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 336.05
Purchase price £ 329.00
Total cost of ownership £ 665.05
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

1.7T
Running this fridge over 10 years will generate 1.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
43
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.7T
Running this fridge over 10 years will generate 1.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
43
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.7T
Running this fridge over 10 years will generate 1.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
43
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Design

Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Type
 Upright
 Upright
 Upright
 Upright
Water Dispenser
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Water dispenser
 Water dispenser
Unknown - Click to provide data
Shelves Material
 Glass
 Glass
 Glass
 Glass
Bottle Rack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bottle rack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Egg Balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
 Egg balcony
Unknown - Click to provide data
Fridge Number of Shelves/baskets
6
BEST
5 5 6
BEST
Control Type
 button
 button
 button
 button
Reversible Doors
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Reversible doors
BEST
 Reversible doors
BEST
 Reversible doors
Door Hinge
 Right
 Right
 Right
 Right
Colour of Product
 White
 White
 White
 White

Performance

Fridge Net Capacity
350L
BEST
348L 350L
BEST
350L
BEST
Noise Level
42dB 42dB 42dB Unknown - Click to provide data
Thermostat
 Thermostat
 Thermostat
 Thermostat
Unknown - Click to provide data
Multi-Airflow System
 Multi-airflow system
 Multi-airflow system
 Multi-airflow system
Unknown - Click to provide data
Defrost Function
 Defrost function
 Defrost function
 Defrost function
Unknown - Click to provide data
Climate Class
 T
 SN
BEST
 T
 SN
BEST
 T
 SN
BEST
 T
 SN
Fridge Gross Capacity
355L
BEST
353L 355L
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Door Open Alarm
 Door open alarm
 Door open alarm
 Door open alarm
 Door open alarm
Interior Light
 Interior light
 Interior light
 Interior light
Unknown - Click to provide data
Temperature Alarm
 Temperature alarm
 Temperature alarm
 Temperature alarm
Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A++
 A+
 A++
 A+
 A++
 A+
 A++
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
143kWh 143kWh 143kWh Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Height
1,800mm 1,800mm 1,800mm 1,800mm
Width
595mm 595mm 595mm 595mm
Depth
684mm 684mm 684mm 689mm
Weight
69kg 69kg 69kg 69kg
Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 76kg
Package Height
1,876mm 1,876mm 1,876mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
747mm 747mm 747mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
653mm 653mm 653mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Installation Compartment Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,850mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Installation Compartment Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 734mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Installation Compartment Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 695mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth Without Handle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 642.5mm

Other Features

Total Gross Capacity
355L
BEST
353L 355L
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Door Type
 Single
 Single
 Single
 Single
Dimensions (WxDxH)
595 x 684 x 1800 595 x 684 x 1800 595 x 684 x 1800 Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
Installation Compartment Dimensions (WxDxH)
Unknown - Click to provide data 695 x 734 x 1850 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Dimensions (WxDxH)
653 x 747 x 1876 653 x 747 x 1876 653 x 747 x 1876 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback