Close
Share on
Whirlpool AKP539NB
Whirlpool AKP 539

Loading image...

Whirlpool AKP539NB Oven

60L Electric 1 595mm Oct 2013
A
Total Oven(s) Interior Capacity Oven Type Oven Height Release Date Energy Efficiency Rating
Very low energy consumption (conventional)

Available from international sellers only

Tell Me When It Becomes Available See International Prices
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe

Power

Very Low Energy Consumption (conventional)

The AKP 539 has a quite low energy consumption (conventional) (only 0.79 kilowatt hours) compared to most of the other similar spec ovens that have been available for more than two years. Similar spec ovens that were released more than two years ago have energy consumption (conventional) of between 0.54kWh and 1,300kWh.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Other

Released Over Three Years Ago

This Whirlpool oven has been on the market since April 2017.


Oven

One Oven

The Whirlpool AKP 539 is a one oven oven which is average compared to the other 1,037 ovens that came out around the same time as this oven that we have assessed the number of ovens of.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers newappliances akp539nb, whirlpool akp539nb
Barcodes 08003437936579, 08003437936586

Other Ovens to Consider

Zanussi ZOF35712XK vs Whirlpool AKP 539

Zanussi ZOF35712XK vs Whirlpool AKP 539
Zanussi ZOF35712XK Whirlpool AKP 539
£ 325.00 £0.00
Lighter
Better Timer
Two Separate Ovens
A Little Shallower
Older by Ten Months
Inferior Energy Efficiency Rating

Smeg S45VCX2 vs Whirlpool AKP 539

Smeg S45VCX2 vs Whirlpool AKP 539
Smeg S45VCX2 Whirlpool AKP 539
£ 449.99 £0.00
0.47kWh Lower Forced Convection Energy Consumption
Twice As Good Timer
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
A Lot Shorter
Older by Ten Months
A Little Lower Total Power

Neff B58VT68N0B vs Whirlpool AKP 539

Neff B58VT68N0B vs Whirlpool AKP 539
Neff B58VT68N0B Whirlpool AKP 539
£ 939.00 £0.00
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
A Lot Higher Total Oven Power
0.3m Longer Cable Length
23% Lower Energy Consumption (forced Convection)
Bigger Current
Higher Energy Consumption (conventional)
Feedback